How does a person with an IQ of 120 differ, in psychology, with someoone with an IQ of 140?

How does a person with an IQ of 120 differ, in psychology, with someoone with an IQ of 140?

What about a person with an IQ of 160?

Why is it that the most intelligent people in American universities are always extremely left wing?

If it is because of the liberal bias in university then does that mean that genetics does not determine one's political views?


Sorry for this newfag-ish question, but I was watching Stefan M. video on genetics and IQ

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3Wx6ubY_ctw
youtube.com/watch?v=DmOzHNgSw6Q
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I have any IQ of 172 and three quarters.

I am neither here nor there.
You are all roaches in my eyes. I care not for your politics and social memery.

I wish you all a short existence.

>172 3/4

Smarter people are typically easy to hypnotize and thus control.
That's the main difference.

>Why is it that the most intelligent people in American universities are always extremely left wing?

Most intelligent people I've met are libertarians, all in the 160+/SD 15 range. Having a university degree these days doesn't mean you're intelligent.

Smart people are often attracted to new things. That's why they are often pro-commie. It's also why cuckshit is 'the thinking man's fetish'. After all, letting someone else fuck your wife is from a biological point of view a very novel thing to do.

IQ was not invented to measure intelligence that way, it was just a way to weed out the legit retarded people, like mentally deficient ones. Most people on Sup Forums have IQs of 140 yet are fucking losers autists with shit jobs, at the most we have STEM students.
Sadly the only thing some people have that makes them feel worthy is their IQ, most of the time calculated with an internet test. Pitiful people t b h

They know it's bad to reveal one's power level

>jews made some of the best cartoons and brought us stuff like Power Rangers and Dragon Ball

They used to be pretty based
youtube.com/watch?v=3Wx6ubY_ctw

??? citation needed

> easier to hypnotize
Fucking retard. You can't be hypnotized against your will.

>used to be pretty based

both those shows are derived from Japanese media...

Most people unknowingly choose the political opinions that gives them the most social credit.

Jews started the modern Japanese pop culture boom

youtube.com/watch?v=DmOzHNgSw6Q

No shit, and without Saban we wouldn't have had tokusatsu shows on TV in the 90s

Is it really different between a 100 IQ and a 140 IQ? I never felt different from the other plebs, even if I was a mensa member. Maybe the only thing I've noticed is that I'm quicker to catch and understand things, nothing more

I have an IQ of 140 or so. I'm a self aware narcissist and sociopath. I've got a 3.7 GPA and constantly rail on leftists on campus. I'm also a deviant who enjoys manipulation and social engineering (think prank net lite). Planning on becoming a lawyer in the future just to coerce and sue people for fun.

Most really intelligent people I've met are into deviant activities, are mentally ill or both. The burden of loneliness (not being able to communicate with 99% of people) can be overwhelming at a young age.

Idk if my intellect is higher than indicated but I've always found it nearly impossible to get along with normies for more than a few months at a time. I tend to get quite bored of their nauseatingly simple prospects and conversations quickly.

>Leaf

>Rape capital of europe

>prank net
That's funny because they were actually Canadians too

I know. Dex actually isn't too far from where I live (about 3 hours)

most smart people had smart parents and have lived their whole life in a cocoon of fantasy surrounded by genuinely good people. The fact that these people vote liberal has nothing to do with their intelligence. They typically change stances later in life due to actual minority exposure before white flighting to make sure their kids don't have to experience nasty poor people and the cycle repeats itself.

Intelligent people spend a lot of their time in leftist indoctrination places like college

Overconfidence and sociopathy.
Intelligence up to a point helps you to be more moral by making you better aware of details and consequences. An intelligent person can play out scenarios in his head and see what bad might result from something.
But intelligence also helps you rationalize and find loopholes.

>leftist

Because, being smarter, it is easier for us to take control of socialist institutions and gain advantage over the weaker minded.

Until it is not longer advantageous, and we just move somewhere else.

...

>Why is it that the most intelligent people in American universities are always extremely left wing?
because I know if I reveal my powerlevel I would be excluded from any social event, nobody wants to hear reason or arguments that goes against the 'norm'

its pretty much this plus naivete. leftism has really pretty lies that will always be socially acceptable even though they hide ugly truths.

I have an iq of 283.6 and I'm a self aware time-traveling god. I've got a 4.9 gpa and constantly rail mere mortals on campus. I'm also a deviant who uses electromagnetic projection to take control of mere mortal minds to do my bidding.

"Intelligent" people tend to be more left-winged because that's what the media pushes forward, and what the media says it's considered official and right by their logic. If every channel would do a full 180 degree on the propaganda, they would go along with it, because that's how fragile their ego is, they can't stand being wrong.

And when we're done here, can can start redefining what are "intelligent" people, since most of them are pretenders, and if IQ matters at all if it's above 100.

I'm Haruhi Suzumiya and I have an IQ of infinity.

I also have a rockin' body, bow before me you mere faggot.

>And when we're done here, can can start redefining what are "intelligent" people, since most of them are pretenders, and if IQ matters at all if it's above 100.

+1

When everyone thinks they're smart, no one is smart.

The difference between a normal person and anyone with a super high IQ is not as great as the difference between normal to legally retarded IQ.

120=slightly smarter than average normie
140=autismo

neural connection speed

>that train wreck of sentence

kill me.

Think carefully about what IQ is a measure of specifically.

I have an IQ of 600.0000 and is a Holocaust survivor!!!

There are a lot of correlations associated with high intelligence. Poor vision, physically weak/unfit, very skinny or very fat, left-leaning political views, high trust/naivety, even homosexuality.

The problem is that none of these things are inherently good just because they often correlate with high intelligence, despite what libs fallaciously try to assert.

Imagine a house with five rooms, each one filled with 100 random people all over the world.

In one room you got people with an IQ of 80, in other, 100, the third one got fellas at 120, the fourth, 140, and the last one, 160.

Assuming that you don't know the IQ of any group, and everyone stayed in their designated room, and you spent a day walking through the rooms, meeting people and watching their interactions, do you honestly believe that all groups would look similar to you?

>There are a lot of correlations associated with high intelligence. Poor vision, physically weak/unfit, very skinny or very fat, left-leaning political views, high trust/naivety, even homosexuality.
>The problem is that none of these things are inherently good just because they often correlate with high intelligence, despite what libs fallaciously try to assert.

Sauce this, please. Pretty big claims.

I like ass.

>Sketch briefly Sir Walter Rawleigh
u wot

One of the bigger traits is macro-goal awareness, and the capacity to modify without loss. (120,140)

IQ means you perform better on an IQ test. That's it. Everything else is just people with no accomplishments of their own trying to feel better about themselves.

MENSA is loaded with people like that, for example. If you look at a list of MENSA members, that tend to not have any significant intellectual accomplishments. At best you might see actors or celebrities or something. You won't see anyone who has actually contributed significantly to any academic fields or research.

t. butthurt 80iq nigger

They aren't. If you look at the fields with the highest average IQ (maths, physics) you will notice that they tend to be less "progressive" than your average sociology major.

Nobody took the bait :(

>intelligent people in American universities are always extremely left wing
Because they're dependent on government for a living. There are plenty intelligent people outside of University (engineers, good businessmen, etc.) and they tend Republican.

Anything below 100 is close to retardation, that's why I've set 100 as a starting point, that's why I didn't mention anything below that. IQ test do have their uses, to test problem solving capabilities.

And yes, there are going to be differences, but they're not even close to being error-free. Someone with 160 can behave like the one with 100, and vice versa. But despite this, there are going to be differences yeah.

However, this doesn't mean that IQ can work the same way in the real world like on the paper. Creativity and personality play an extreme factor in one's success, and if someone with 100 is more motivated, optimistic and down to earth than someone with 160 with an extreme ego, demanding respect for nothing and constant depression, the 100 is going to be more successful.

IQ+100 determines some things that play a small to medium part in one's life, depending in what field you're working in, because naturally some people just aren't fit for the job, no matter how hard they try.

138 IQ here.

Same thing. I don't feel any smarter than the average pleb. I just understand concepts easily, so I didn't have to study very hard in university for my STEM degree. Others would study for weeks and get a B and be astonished when I told them I just studied the day before the exam (and paid attentiom in class) and got an A.

On the other hand, I have met geniuses whose knowledge and love of learning were completely astonishing, and felt like a subhuman in comparison.

Just because somone's a genius in one field doesn't mean they can't be completely retarded in another. After all, despite fleeing from the National Socialists in Germany, and living in the capitalist US instead of the USSR, Einstein still considered himself a socialist.

>tfw I probably have a pretty average IQ

I think it's fedora as fuck to claim you're super smart and above everyone else

People who can do. People who can't brag about their IQ.

>I'm a self aware narcissist and sociopath

all sociopaths are self aware and narcissism is a bullshit tumblr tier 'quirk'. Most people are narcissists, it is aberrant to be altruistic.

When you go to a university you are inevitably exposed to working with people of different races, regions and backgrounds and you begin to understand that they are just regular people with no ill intent.

My IQ is 130 and I feel like a fucking idiot.

General IQ probably doesn't habe a whole lot to do with psychology or personality. However, more intelligent people often seem to have more eccentric world views.

Having high IQ and EQ, is pretty much a recipe for disaster though.
Not only do you get to feel all the egotism, ignorance and stupidity that human society is consist of, but you also have a nagging voice of reason in your head telling you that life is fucked on a fundamental level, it's never going to get any better and there is no determinable meaning to it.

Why do people care so much about IQ? Just read a book or play video games, talking about IQ won't make you smarter, quite the opposite actually.

Leftism has been inserted into universities and since most high IQ people tend not to specialize in social shit and instead go for science, their beliefs are just a result of not 1) the leftist climate 2) them not having to question the beliefs forced down their throat from birth.

Also, lefties forget we're mere humans and we don't necessarily conform to whatever abstraction they come up with, no matter how logical it appears.

Leftism has been inserted into universities and since most high IQ people tend not to specialize in social shit and instead go for science, their beliefs are just a result of 1) the leftist climate 2) them not having to question the beliefs forced down their throat from birth.

Also, lefties forget we're mere humans and we don't necessarily conform to whatever abstraction they come up with, no matter how logical it appears.