What did you guys think to this?

...

went to go see it sober, didn't had as much fun as the guys beside me who were clearly drunk/high

Surprisingly well made

>who were clearly drunk/high
I.e, the target audience.

DUDE

PHALLUS

Wonder how many times Seth Rogen's been fucked in the ass

Dreamworks?

And waiting for BRrip or comparable

Complete degeneracy

>be tempting looks like kid movies
>overt religion is lie theme, act out all your sexual deviantness including engaging in homosexuality, orgies and polygamy
>somehow has hotdogs smoking weed
>DUDE BATH SALTS TAKES YOU TO A MAGICAL WORLD
>check credits and its made by all jews

Sup Forums was right again

LMAO

There's one out now thats watchable. I really didn't think much to it, and despite how cringe it is to say, it really is reddit humour the movie.

It's painfully bad. If you're looking for a laugh Mike and Dave need a wedding dates a much better film.

>And waiting for BRrip

Why do you think there's threads again all of a sudden.

...

yeah I checked ff after posting and the rips are out apparently, already downloading

thank you for your opinion, mate, i'll watch it anyway because material like that often works well as social lubricant so it might end up on the next game/movie night

>>be tempting looks like kid movies
I guess, but you would have to be stupid to take your kids there. I mean that, you would have to be of subaverage intelligence to have so little concern about the content that your children consume to let them see a movie without having some idea what it's about.

I don't

Don't have to take your kids anywhere to see it. It's online, I saw team america when i was young, my parents didn't even know about it. Kids and teens definitely know how to watch stuff if they want to watch it.

>animators worked overtime with no pay
>whoever quit due to workplace conditions had his name removed from credits
>made by jews
I wish Sup Forums was wrong atleast once.

>It's online, I saw team america when i was young, my parents didn't even know about it.
Ditto.

This is a problem, but I don't think fillmmakers should be restricted by such contingencies. The bigger problem is this movie is fucking horrible in every way, except having better than expected animation, especially for $20, but well below the standard set by the top studios.

It's not going to be a problem for my kids because I'm going to restrict all the content they can experience before they leave my home, even going so far as to chose their friends. My views are extreme, I know, but at least I'm right, and society has force my hand.

So what's the alternative?
Films that you deem wrong simply not existing just in case kids might see it?
Seems a bit much.

>overt religion is lie theme, act out all your sexual deviantness including engaging in homosexuality, orgies and polygamy
I really don't get this, do Jews really believe the only reason people aren't bumming each other constantly is because the Bible says it bad?

You're just going to force them to rebel hard.

>Haha DUDE what if like, sausages could talk?
>Holy shit LMAO!
>This WEED is awesome bro.

Yes, yes, I've heard that quite a bit, but unquestionably, you have some parents don't restrict their children in any way, and there's no question that this would be worse than my method, so I just view the common form of parenting as bad as this extreme.

>asking a question with the premise and context being Nazi propaganda

Hello zero IQ

Nah censorship is bad, I know it doesn't work, did it work with us when we were young? Does it work with most stuff no, it just makes the thing more profitable in the end.

I'd just speak honestly about just how shit the film is and the message it intends to deliver, even if people call me crazy or say you're looking into it to much.

A bit of wildness and stuff is good, its fun, but what sausage party offered was "God is dead we killed god, lets all have orgies and live a vapid existence of lust". If you like that stuff more power to you. It was just blantant and relied purely upon stereotypes and liberal politics. Somehow it gets a crazy good rotten tomato rating despite been just as guilty as ridiculous 6 which was rated terribly.

>Didn't restrict at all
>restrict every aspect of their lives
There's a fucking universe you're ignoring between these two extremes dude.

>wrong atleast once

Do you mean like in all the movies "made by Jews" where this didn't happen? Because the US isn't full of white Christian sociopaths such as the owners of Walmart who abuse their workers, right? I wish a Sup Forums shill made a somewhat logical, if not intelligent comment at least once.

Whilst I agree its a shit film, I very much doubt anyone's moral compass will be shifted by it.

Any r34 out yet?

Word of warning. My partner is a teacher. If she heard of a child describing home life like this, it's classed as the sort of thing they need to report as child abuse.

user, I....

Well, I should say they wouldn't have the conception of rebelling, especially if all their content is restricted. It's also a simple matter of telling them at they if they become a degenerate or stop attending whatever HYPSM school they got into, they will be completely cut off, and I hope I would raise them well enough for them to be smart enough to know what's in their interest.

Don't think I've ever watched a film that was so reliant on bad language as its form of "comedy". I know the dude weed lmao is a meme but the phrased summed up a lot of the "comedy" that wasn't swearing.

Like what? I didn't specify shit. I don't know what fucking state or country you live in where they have a right to playdates or internet, but I didn't describe anything that borders on child abuse.

>they wouldn't have the conception of rebelling,
Rebellion is a psychology certainty, its a period of finding your own identity during adolescence. You can no more keep a child from expressing a desire to be an individual than you can stop them from growing.
He's right. And "choosing theor friends" will leads to a child not properly able to socialise.
I can see you're a bit of a control freak. Maybe kids aren't a good idea for you.

Like another user has said, a child not allowed to choose their friends will be introverted and will display the kind of behaviours you would expect to see from abused kids.

>its a period of finding your own identity during adolescence.
And they can do that it a less destructive manner.

>You can no more keep a child from expressing a desire to be an individual
I wonder how families living as barbarians managed to keep their "children" working in the fields despite this desire. Perhaps idleness is the source of all rebellion. I'll be sure to keep them busy.

>He's right.
I didn't describe anything that would be considered child abuse. I didn't even specify any methods I would use. Both of you are full of shit.

>will leads to a child not properly able to socialise.
So like me and pretty much everyone on this site? Please, there are worse things in life that being a little awkward. It also would not be difficult for me to have the child socialize as a means of practice in a controlled environment.

>I can see you're a bit of a control freak.
With the little power I have, perhaps.

>Maybe kids aren't a good idea for you.
I will need experience to confirm that. I can't do any worse than my parents raised me.

Bullshit if you go all Stalin on them sure they'll rebel. But if you provide measured responses to bad things in your child life they'll understand in the long run. Saying son I don't think you should hang out with johnny because he is literally a thief, here's 20 pounds so you can go do something with Charles who's alright isn't gonna cripple him socially. He's gonna be like fuck yeah money lets go out, and if he goes out with johnny to the cinema or shoplifting then cut him off for a bit, it's discipline not destruction.

>a child not allowed to choose their friends will be introverted and will display the kind of behaviours you would expect to see from abused kids.
They will always have their work and of course, me, unless I find a need to cut them off. "Choosing friends," isn't a necessary condition for being well adjusted.

>it's another post where anything he doesn't like is "degenerate"

fuck off w/ your tumblr-tier buzzwords

Neither one of you seem to understand rebellion.

Its not inherently destructive, its not conditioned by the media, but it will manifest more in children who are restricted.

All rebellion is, in a nutshell is a child being bored of the way the are used to and wanting to try something different.

That's all.

In the case of your "barbarian tribes" rebellion might have been as simple as, I don't want to til the land I want to hunt or be a fighter.

> I didn't even specify any methods I would use.
Choosing their friends.

> there are worse things in life that being a little awkward
But if you're trained to look for introversion in children as a sign of abuse, then perhaps you need to at least be aware.

>I can't do any worse than my parents raised me.
I'm sure you can. You may not want to, but you can.
This all strict or no rules mindset you have needs to change for a start.

>I'm going to blackmail my toddler and force them to never have friends I disapprove of until such point as they have only me or nothing at all
>But he'll turn out ok
I honestly and sincerely hope you are just memeing for (You)s or that you are sterile. Otherwise I pity these kids you may have.

Teacher Partner user here, kinda wish I hadn't mentioned anything now.

There's is a difference between rebellion and anarchy, rebellion between parent and child good, complete anarchy just isn't. I'm not a parent but from seeing tonnes of kids around it's clear the line between rebellion and anarchy has been blurred.

I think you're massively over reacting personally. Kids aren't anarchists, they're just playing up to troll people IRL.

Isn't buzzword a buzzword though?

Of course they aren't anarchists it was a figure of speech, to show there's a difference between letting a kid do what ever they want, and positively facilitating there development whilst not being a dictator to them.

>I don't want to til the land I want to hunt or be a fighter.
In that case, he can focus less on Latin and focus more on his concert career or chess, or something or the other.

Whatever the fuck Chinese parents do to get their children into line, I'll do it.

>Choosing their friends.
That's quite ambiguous, but I would like to see what legal standard of child abuse would make this illegal.

>But if you're trained to look for introversion in children as a sign of abuse, then perhaps you need to at least be aware.
Okay, see, this is actually good advice, and I'll consider it.

>This all strict or no rules mindset you have needs to change for a start.
I would consider this better than the way my parents raised me. The "Authoritative parenting is the best," is a meme, pure and simple.

>I'm going to blackmail my toddler
You misunderstood me. They're only going to be blackmailed once they've left the house. They won't have a choice as long as they're living under my roof.

People on drugs writing a script.

What difference does it make?

>Actually enjoy it
>Not-so-subtle sexual innuendo n imagery but isn't taken too far. I used for humour.
>End of film is some huge degenerate "orgy" that felt awkward as fuck to watch n totally out of place

Ruined the film senpai

Literally my face that scene

>to show there's a difference between letting a kid do what ever they want, and positively facilitating there development whilst not being a dictator to them.
My point was that I consider, for the ultimate benefit of the kids, the most common method to be far too permissive, so I was lumping moderate with the extremely permissive because they suffer from the same problem.

Sure, thats fair. I just wish this guy understood that.

I'm going to tell you two last things then walk away.

1, You are a fantascist if you think you can control your child's life. There are more than two positions than Super Strict and No Rules. Simple as that.

2, I recently read a case study on a certain individual, a psychology paper. Very dry, very dull for the most part so I'll spare you the technicalities. Suffice to say from our admittedly limited interaction, I'm seeing a lot of commonality. A feeling of helplessness, a desire to exert control for good rather than Ill, a pathological fixation on your own and your parent's perceived failures and a desire to rectify them. The study in question was one Joseph Fritzl. Remember him?

I'm not saying you're precisely the same and I'm not even suggesting you will build a rape dungeon. What I am however suggesting is that perhaps you need to think a lot more rationally about this issue, and if other experienced parents are telling you what you suggest is a bad idea, maybe not be such a rebellious little kid thinking you know best and actually do your future children a favour and listen.

Now, that said, good day. I reiterate, I sincerely hope you are a ruseman, but in the possible event you aren't, you aren't remotely ready for children.

>There are more than two positions than Super Strict and No Rules.
I was trying to make the point that I see permissive as the ultimate evil on parent-child relationships, of the greatest one that exist today in modern parenting, so what's essential in the extreme is found in the moderation, and that anything far from it would be an improvement.

>You are a fantascist if you think you can control your child's life.
1. Homeschooled
2. Only leave house when I can control their environment

That's like 85% of the work done right there. The problem is getting them to work on certain activities is the challenging part, but I already got the essential points out of the way.

>The study in question was one Joseph Fritzl.
I would have to see the specifics, but I doubt he was raised in the way I'm envisioning.

>I'm not even suggesting you will build a rape dungeon.
kek, you were saying I was like Fritzl? K, well I don't agree with that.

>you need to think a lot more rationally about this issue
I'm sure I could just play it by ear.

> maybe not be such a rebellious little kid thinking you know best and actually do your future children a favour and listen.
I am listening, I just don't agree.

>you are a ruseman,
Nope

>you aren't remotely ready for children.
I never said I was, just giving my conception of how I would raise them, but it has more to do with lacking the resources.

>What did you guys think to this?