What the fuck are we turning into as a society?

What the fuck are we turning into as a society?

because a female traffic light sign is necessary

Posthumans. We are decontructing our biology, reducing it to absurdity.

what is bitching to a board filled with neets going to do? If it's really bothering you that fucking much go smash the cunt up.

Government is literally just fucking pissing money away for no good reason at this point

libfags ruining it

Why is the woman supposed to wear a skirt? could it not be that the old symbol was a woman in pants? Such misogyny...

ITT: manlets who feel threatened by strong, assertive women. Or any women really.

>at this point

¿How's middle school going?

maybe it's a transwoman

Up next, transgender traffic lights

Not threatened. Confused.
How does a traffic light = equality? If you're a woman living in the US, any feeling of inequality is in your head.

This traffic light is transitioning into a stop sign.

This, I want the old picture but it's a woman in pants.

Why does the dress have to equal a woman? Could the old traffic signal not have also been a woman?

If only this were true.

Nice observation, the new signs are men in dresses.

I could see this sparking a whole femenist movement about
Why does the crosswalk person have to wear a dress. Than that whole assuming gender group wanting attack helicopters on the street lights.
So a step to equality huh?

This. Most women don't regularly wear dresses now, they are assuming the gender based on old prejudices.

pretty sure that's a kilt

lmao does a traffic light really bother you that much?

M8 finished college 3 years ago so middle schools a bit off

It bothered someone enough they had to spend tax dollars to give the crosswalk figure a dress.

>implying women don't wear pants
>a step forward for equality
i call shenanigans.

Also ITT libtard cuck bitches like a libtard cuck

aye lad

hehe, this is simply too easy to attack on their own terms.
>Female traffic lights are gender normative, and enforce the gender binary
>Female traffic lights with women in dresses reinforces gender stereotypes
>Female traffic lights enforce female body beauty stereotypes
>Female traffic lights still don't represent people of color
>Female traffic lights are litteral object and could enforce objectification of women in society

Take your pick. No SJW can really defend this, because it goes against their own logic.

Some say we need planet wide war to revert our society to blank slate. But is there any nation the really pose a significant threat to us?

Man there are some sensitive little beta bitches on this website. It's a fucking street sign little man.

>strong, Assertive women.
But they need female traffic signal to feel equal to men. Fuck off

"What the fuck are we turning into as a society?"

into a better one constantly

i love retards who cry about nothing of importance

>planet wide
Mainly the english speaking world is having problems (Well, Sweden too). Keep the rest of us out of it if you don't mind. But if you feel the need to fuck someone up, please let it be Russia.

>No SJW can really defend this, because it goes against their own logic
SJW's won't be bothered by that, because they don't really follow their own "logic".

...

Because feminists fighting to be represented by late 1800 housewives on a street sign is somehow empowerment to them.

True, but catching them in their inconsistencies can still lead to funny situations. Have you seen the video of the SJW having a melt-down when she found it Lauren Southern, whom she was speaking to, was legally a trans-person?
Pure comedy gold.

It can be concieved as innocent.
If you don't like it, ignore it.

>Giving a fuck is so 2017.

I like this. It's like meme magic. Enforces the female symbolism and puts it into our minds.
Might result in worship of females.

...

More like someone needed a job so they made one up.

Nigger, who fucking cares?

This just reinforces the idea that women can't wear pants

So gender is social construct? Literal body-parts and chromosomes don't determine gender, but somehow a stick-figure that appears to wear a dress is definitely a women?

im not baiting but you can believe what you want you autist

OP is literally crying about a stopsign, becoming just as worse as the girls hes crying about, its fucking painfully ironic and retarded

gender and sex is not the same thing you autist

An idea that no one has actually held for generations.

1/10 trap

heh

¡Thank you!

That's a FTM user.

Soy boy pls go

OP is crying about the fact that someone thinks this is a step forward for equality. It's sad someone thinks that, and sad that people see stick-figure male stop signs as being oppressive.

People thinking dumb thinks is sad.

Exactly. Feminism is living in an antiquated era.

You mean the retard that first cried "we need a female on traffic lights!"

the human race has never had it better since the dawn of time you idiots, and some autistic kids are gonna cry about stoplights being changed, and act like its gonna change anything

both opposite poles are equally retarded, they dont even realize they're the same person, they're just countering each other point of view, making them equally retarded

A traffic light is not a "step forward for equality"

It's a city literally wasting money

Of all the fucking things that can be done for equality, they pick a traffic signal. Amazing progress!

The only thing this proves is that women don't know when to cross the street.

Shut up loser I make a living off of this.

Liberal titty babies.

>Being a women means your wear a dress
How progressive is this shit ?

But add tits to it. For equality.

No, generally speaking one side is for equality of opportunity and another is for equality of outcome. And one side believes there is systematic oppression of women, and the other doesn't.

They are opposing views in an ongoing debate, and there really is very little middle ground between these views, so trying to play the moderate card is not easy in this, hyperbolically named, culture war.

i never said it was a step forward for equality, im saying its equally retarded crying about the stopsign

and the money arguement is moot when there is corruption with billions of money everywhere, stopsigns wont mount to that level you fucking autist

Are you pretending to be retarded?

More like regressive.

Just one, for breast cancer survivors.

>into a better one constantly
Yeah Trump is doing great!

If you seriously don't understand the difference between sex and gender the next ten years are going to be hard for you.

the thing these people have in common is that they're crying about things that dont fucking matter, its a fucking stopsign, no normal human being cares what the fuck happens about stopsigns, only fucking high functioning autists do

you're a literal autist if you cant acknowledge sex and gender is not the same

It could be, depending on definition. And it's completely valid to use sex and gender synonymously. You know why?

Because language is a SOCIAL CONSTRUCT.

Go back to your trap thread

Sorry, xir. I wasn't born in the 90's/2000's. You think you have it all figured out now... give it time.

>equating mental illness with gender
You've been jewed.

The symbol is so skinny it's setting an unrealistic standard for women's bodies. #MeToo

>Sup Forums getting triggered by seeing a woman on a traffic light

KEK

Social constructs are a social construct.

You're the only one crying. Calm down.

Exactly. It's like niggers trying to redefine racism so they can't be racist. A line needs to be drawn.

I am Jewish you skinhead loser.

>>Sup Forums getting triggered by seeing a woman

ftfy

lol no, im pointing out the retards

op with
"What the fuck are we turning into as a society?" ;_;
is genuine crying, and most of the replies in this thread, too

It's ableist, too. What about people in wheelchairs and scooters?

thread is an embarrassment

...

>If you seriously don't understand the difference between sex and gender the next ten years are going to be hard for you.
>you're a literal autist if you cant acknowledge sex and gender is not the same
Let's just assume that is a fact, now what difference does it make to the subject of discussion? What is the significance of bringing that up?

sad part is the original was already unisex because believe it or not women wear pants too.

Why are you so mad, though?

ironic, the same people pushing this shit are the same ones who insist gender isn't real and men can wear dresses too. sure gets your noggin joggin doesn't it?

Yes it is you moron, it is legally defined as such. The notion that they aren't is a pseudo scientific position adopted by modern gender theorists who are desperately pretending that their opinions are reality

Unisexual is still patriarchal. It should be feminine.

It's almost like it's a blatant political move with no real substance...

Sex and gender are literally the same and legally and medically defined as such. Pretending they aren't makes you the autist

Not sure how a man wearing a dress in the traffic light equates to equality.

Fuck you, you genetically male faggot.

Your Chromes determine you bones.
Your Chromes determine your gender.
Your pseudoscience is shit.
Fap to traps you stupid nigger.

A poem for you.

>legally

¿Where? ¿What's the law say exactly?

Why couldn't the other one be a female? Its a generic person shape, 2 legs, 2 arms and a head. No primary or secondary sexual characteristics are shown.

It's only a female traffic signal if its wearing a fucking DRESS?

Pic related
>green non-gendered walk icon
>oh wait its already like that

>Chrome

I use Firefox actually.

ur mum is an embarrassment

Just put a green foot for go, red foot for stay. Then everyone can stfu.

Easy solution. Instead of classifying sex and gender the same, just deny the existence of gender as sjw's just seem to make their own definitions for things.

The years will be good to you because you think based on logic and reason, not fantasy and feelings.

¿What about people without feet?

This is the leftist contradiction

>Societal ideas of masculinity and femininity are constructs

also

>We need more depictions of traditional feminine imagery

Hard to have it both ways