What was the point of this?

What was the point of this?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=x1bX3F7uTrg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Adam Curtis does a documentary on Sup Forums
This is a story about a website
>"Something I Can Never Have" starts playing
>plane scene from TDKR playing in slow-mo
A website which bridged the gap between order and chaos
>panning shot of AlyDoLL's basement
It was founded by man obsessed with Chinese cartoons
>close-up B&W pic of Moot
He was convinced that it was his aim to create a new world
>pic of Moot as the "little girl"
But this was a fantasy, and instead he unleashed a force he could not control
>montage of Jessi Slaughter, Fappening pics, rare Pepes
Instead something strange happened and evil triumphed over good
>Theme from "Moon" starts playing
>5min clip of various threads full of shitposting
But the story really begins five years ago...

top kek

also this

youtube.com/watch?v=x1bX3F7uTrg

I "DROPPED" this entertaining documentary when he started the nine eleven segment.

d
r
o
p
p
e
d

>it's Sup Forumseddit has a short attention span thread

this is pure kino

Typical american, can't handle banter

Curtis never name's, name's.

any red-piller can see through his gate keeping bullshit.

This, he supports the exact same narrative the establishment propagates by demonizing anti-establishment movements like Brexit and Trump's campaign. Also has an odd fixation on making Syria and Putin look bad. Almost like he is shilling for Western intervention in the region.

I like the bit when he talks about countries getting massive un-payable loans from "the bankers".

top kek
nothing to see here.
move along.

wew lad
not like you're coming from an unobjective standpoint or anything eh

Yeah because Curtis' documentary was so impartial in what it chose to focus on. The guy has a clear bias, nothing wrong with that, but at the same time it's something that should be pointed out since they guy pretends to be a more objective filmmaker than someone like Michael Moore, for example.

I liked the bit where gadaffi mentions being bullied by "officers" while being educated in Britain.

top kek
move along
nothing to see here.

What does that even mean?

what do you mean ?

The user liked that bit.

You scumbags are the establishment, the economically illiterate, neonazi establishment

The standard of debate has shifted so far right and so simplified that anything to the left of hitler appears biased to you

Psuedo-intellectual bullcrap

>look guize there's a global conspiracy of bankers and da 1%!!!!
>it was their plan all along and that's why the world is shit!!!!
>I know this because I'm sooooo smart!! xDDDD

lets all keeps getting loans.

Basically the guy read Edward Bernays, David Harvey, and Eric Hoffer and made a career out of it.

whats your point ?

Just some communist nonsense. look at this dumb faggots face.

hes looks like an even sadder morrisey from a famous uk band "inxs"

Ah so you got triggered because your precious populists got criticised. Got it. Meanwhile Curtis has been criticised for right wing sentiments.

Yeah nah. You're just really stupid.

moore or Curtis

pick1 user's

Thanks Sup Forums for meming Adam Curtis.
Now all the useless mongoloids can chime in with their nothing criticisms bred out of misunderstanding due to low attention spans.

useless comment detected.

Tu quoque

But this was a trap

The documentary never had a point to begin with