Would you let her babysit your children alone for a day?

Would you let her babysit your children alone for a day?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/5Br5kdIOsgI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Definitely not. There’s a reason we restrict the age of consent to what it is.

only on tuesdays

No there isn't. As long as you don't puritanically shame them, a human can be positively sexual at very young ages.

Here she is getting baptized: youtu.be/5Br5kdIOsgI

Fucking rekt

...

More?

should i know who this is? someone famous? some random? who's the person in blue? why are they censored? most importantly, more of her?

...

Disagree. Early sexual contact, even in cultures which do not look down upon such, has been shown to have a negative impact upon the child. Read about the child brides of India, South East Asia, and Arabia

Child brides are often forced into it.

But when it's heavily informed, loving, and consensual, it's entirely healthy. Even more so starting at puberty.

Where is your proof? Everything I’ve read disagrees with you, but it’s entirely possible that it’s been cultural bias.

Huh... and now her conversation is Sup Forums fodder...
I hope she didn't get fucked over just because she shared a dream with someone she thought she could trust

Montoya

+1 for diplomacy and mature discussion

he's right and it just makes the blue pills angrier

itt faggots not realizing this slut has been posted here longer than the fappening

Lol ur gay

>India, South East Asia, and Arabia
>Cultural bias

If the examples come from the most misogynistic, anti-women countries, yes i'd call them biased. I am talking about loving, healthy, relationships,

Yea, sure. Dreams are weird and you usually can't control them.

lol urine

I’m fine with that. But where is your proof that loving, healthy relationship do not result in long term damage to the child?

Where is proof they do? I can't prove a negative.

Gay boy

where did you find these?

On Sup Forums, but just search her name on porn sites, usually with bible, you'll find stuff. I know pics of hers are on xham and image fap

No, I think you can in this case: A study done tracing the development of children who were involved in healthy sexual relationships at an early age and their outcomes as compared to a random sample of children not involved in sexual relationships at an early age would convince me.

I will, at the very least, withdraw judgement until I can review why I believed what I believed, and whether I should still believe it.

I don't think any scientific body would dare submit any papers that defend pedophilia. You're asking proof of something society has deemed an extreme taboo for illogical reasons, but it is nontheless a VERY widespread and VERY vicious taboo to cross or publicize.

...

You can prove the positive: "Long term loving and healthy relationships" shared by couples with a distinct age difference CAN exist without negative effects on the younger party

If the only evidence I have is that early sexual relationships is harmful to children, then I will continue to believe that early sexual relationships are harmful to women. I do admit that it may be biased, and I will do further research into the matter, though.

If you don’t mind, I’d like to know why you believe these relationships aren’t harmful. Perhaps I’m missing something that you could bring to my attention. Would you mind explaining?

I could set out to, but conducting the science would be illegal and unethical in a lot of ways.

I've never personally broken the law on the matter, so I have no proof from that end either.

Anecdotally speaking, I did have an ex that was in relations with an uncle from 8 to 13 and she was quite normal and undamaged from it.

>>submitted by a scientific body
No need. Anyone looking for that would be trying to appeal to authority. All we need is sufficient scientific evidence and examples of matching test cases to validate the conclusion. Anyone could assemble that, no need for a scientist or scientific body

Goodness, I screwed that pretty badly. What I mean to say is:
If the only evidence I have is that early sexual relationships are harmful to children, then I will continue to believe that early sexual relationships are harmful to children. I do admit that it may be biased, and I will do further research into the matter, though.

If you don’t mind, I’d like to know why you believe these relationships aren’t harmful. Perhaps I’m missing something that you could bring to my attention. Would you mind explaining?

>I did have an ex that was in relations with an uncle from 8 to 13 and she was quite normal and undamaged from it
she was with you so how normal could she really be

this guy gets it

She left me. I'd call her pretty sane for doing that.

That's called manipulation. And yes they do get fucked up. As someone who has dealt with these kids you can literally knife yourself in the neck.

lol nice

but seriously though, fuck that shit. don't let user get you down

Yes, some cases are manipulative and abusive.

Some are not, and borne of love and consent and education.

How is "not puritanically shaming them" the same thing as "manipulating them"?

it's too dark to see anything

>borne

Seriously? Just admit you want to fuck smaller kids who don't understand it's healthy to fuck someone who's in a similar mental state.

>Nice figure, visible slit, erotic context
>not professionally recorded in ultraHD
It's fine

Which you ONLY dealt with the ones who have been hurt, the ones who were not don't need you or anybody else to deal with it.

Yes, there are a LOT of children being screwed over by pedophilia related issues, but definitely not all.

I'm not denying evil, why do people like you always believe that.

...

...

...

i am blind

got more of these chats?

Lots

moar

...

...

this girl seems fucked in the head

give me her full name, I want to try her hahahahah

...

I know and I want her even more.

Mormon here - Give me 10 15 year olds and I will study this.

...

Moriah Montoya watch the YouTube video the profile of Robert Montoya her father c'mon newfag we gotta ruin some lives!!!

Lol, she's knocked up, married to a neckbeard, and lives in a trailer now

bump

Assuming people that live in trailers take pictures of themselves in front of their shitshack that doesn't even look like her mane

No it's her

>motherless com/9F278D2

Her vids

bump

sure