>Isn't that all wrong? wrong in what sense? is it wrong to enjoy things? >Who else should I listen to? Debussy, Ravel, Satie's nocturnes
Camden Phillips
Idk isn't tchaikovskys sp supposed to be if infinitely inferior to someone like Rachmaninov
And thanks for recs. Can't quite get into Debussy outside of Claire de lune.
Zachary Gray
>isn't tchaikovskys sp supposed to be if infinitely inferior to someone like Rachmaninov huh, no. it's rather the other way around >Can't quite get into Debussy outside of Claire de lune. perhaps start with the Suite? youtube.com/watch?v=EwtHt9Qe8tU
Hudson Foster
In terms of solo piano material? I think most people don't even know Tchaikovsky composed for SP, let alone thinking he's superior to Rachmaninov, in that regard.
Ryan Perry
honestly, I don't give a rat's ass about what anyone thinks
Eli Hall
...
Ian Robinson
This suite is fairly decent thus far.
It's not really mind blowing stuff for me though. I don't know why.
Chopin does floaty, for instance, but there's always an essence of melancholy to his work. I just feel as though Debussy generally lacks that depth. It's like the music is tailored more towards a girl readying herself for a date with a prince or something. Idk.
How do you like this? It's not as complex as most of his work but it's solo piano. I think it's on spotify.
Jean and Aino is my favorite.
Noah Green
Unlike anyone you've listened to so far, Debussy is an early modern composer, he was one of the revolutionaries who fathered the modernity. >Debussy generally lacks that depth For me depth is not necessarily romantic pathos, an act of contemplation has its own depth, often more than pompous tragedy, it's simply not obvious to people who are accustomed to emotional excess.
Nathaniel Rivera
Nothing beats Chopin OP, you've already experienced the best
Luke Martin
>For me depth is not necessarily romantic pathos True. I don't think anyone denies that. >an act of contemplation has its own depth, often more than pompous tragedy, it's simply not obvious to people who are accustomed to emotional excess. It does to some extent but whether as perception or as reflection, contemplation doesn't reach the depths of understanding or tragedy proper. It's simply not obvious to people who are accustomed to justifying their own preferences regardless of merit.
>contemplation doesn't reach the depths of understanding or tragedy proper. It never tries to, they exist in different domains. Contemplation belongs to music, tragedy to theatre.
Hudson Walker
Op here and I don't even know what's going on
Going to listen to the Grieg rec
Henry Rodriguez
>It never tries to Never said it does. >Contemplation belongs to music, tragedy to theatre. Both have musical representations.
Ian Clark
Grieg is p spicy. Way better than that faggot cunt talentless hack deboipussy
Joshua Morgan
Tbqh yet to see anything that would challenge this.
I've delved extensively into his work and it's virtually all just flawless.
Connor Wilson
Too contemporary
Also not solo piano.
Nicholas Price
I can't do this
It just keeps rambling on and on. It's the kind of solo piano I actually just can't listen to for any extended period of time, let alone enjoy.
Also, to elaborate on this: this is the kind of music people kill themsleves to
Christopher Robinson
Where's the lie tho
Robert Nelson
Okay, there were some slower parts, but this overall was superb
Julian Johnson
art tatum, liszt
Robert Sullivan
What did he mean by this
Christopher Sullivan
Art tatum was a famous jazz pianist known for virtuoso technique, Liszt is famous for his Hungarian rhapsodies and other solo piano stuff. I recommend their music to you.
William Nguyen
I don't want no jazz piano tf man
Christian Russell
Idk what to tell you about Debussy OP. Try his etudes, but I guess he really isn't for you. youtube.com/watch?v=FymZsN_NiB4 Imo if you really want to see what Debussy can do you have to go outside piano music, his string quartet and La Mer are unparalleled
>Idk isn't tchaikovskys sp supposed to be if infinitely inferior to someone like Rachmaninov lmao
Isaiah Brooks
Just in terms of piano solo dude
Jayden Evans
It's not wrong, just odd. Tchaikovsky wasn't a particularly prominent pianist, so his solo piano output is not only more limited, but less dense. What do you like of his sp works, anything in particular? To say something you could try Gaspard de la Nuit by Ravel, or the suite Goyescas by Enrique Granados, but i'm just throwing them there to contribute anything to be fair.
Angel Perry
Dumka, June, valse sentimantales, chant elegiaque, to name a few
And I will add those to my playlist
Dominic Smith
Lol get out CLT-senpai
Liam Wilson
kek
Kevin Williams
>Debussy generally lacks that depth. It's like the music is tailored more towards a girl readying herself for a date with a prince or something. Idk.
>t. I never listened to Debussy outside of claire de lune or his early works