Just getting into solo piano

Just getting into solo piano.

So far my favorites are Chopin, Beethoven, Tchaikovsky, Rachmaninov, Scriabn, and Prokofiev (who I dislike). In that order.

Who else should I listen to? And what the fuck is wrong my preference for Tchaikovsky over both Rachmaninov and Scriabin? Isn't that all wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=EwtHt9Qe8tU
youtube.com/watch?v=A6s49OKp6aE
youtube.com/watch?v=8HON4AswPVk
youtube.com/watch?v=Rsd3f5CJkbU
youtube.com/watch?v=gq83dUB37rI
youtube.com/watch?v=Aj2gFk0FoKo
youtube.com/watch?v=FymZsN_NiB4
youtube.com/watch?v=K9BQ1ylApto
youtube.com/watch?v=uaCPY4Plg14
youtube.com/watch?v=XiDtLscGnn8
youtube.com/watch?v=IDzIVgnHVwE
youtube.com/watch?v=Z9qsJKvwG3g
youtube.com/watch?v=apzSvM6Esdc
youtube.com/watch?v=6p1HDpf48Tg
youtube.com/watch?v=OXSWFlwX9a4
youtube.com/watch?v=fRRB9fABhpQ
m.youtube.com/watch?v=m0ej7G0Fuug
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Isn't that all wrong?
wrong in what sense? is it wrong to enjoy things?
>Who else should I listen to?
Debussy, Ravel, Satie's nocturnes

Idk isn't tchaikovskys sp supposed to be if infinitely inferior to someone like Rachmaninov

And thanks for recs. Can't quite get into Debussy outside of Claire de lune.

>isn't tchaikovskys sp supposed to be if infinitely inferior to someone like Rachmaninov
huh, no. it's rather the other way around
>Can't quite get into Debussy outside of Claire de lune.
perhaps start with the Suite?
youtube.com/watch?v=EwtHt9Qe8tU

In terms of solo piano material? I think most people don't even know Tchaikovsky composed for SP, let alone thinking he's superior to Rachmaninov, in that regard.

honestly, I don't give a rat's ass about what anyone thinks

...

This suite is fairly decent thus far.

It's not really mind blowing stuff for me though. I don't know why.

Actually it's getting better

Meh, try this one. youtube.com/watch?v=A6s49OKp6aE

I don't get it

check kill yourself quick starter pack

Better... but it just feels so floaty.

Chopin does floaty, for instance, but there's always an essence of melancholy to his work. I just feel as though Debussy generally lacks that depth. It's like the music is tailored more towards a girl readying herself for a date with a prince or something. Idk.

>Debussy generally lacks that depth
Yes, it was just a pretty rec. Give this a shot - youtube.com/watch?v=8HON4AswPVk

youtube.com/watch?v=Rsd3f5CJkbU

How do you like this? It's not as complex as most of his work but it's solo piano. I think it's on spotify.

Jean and Aino is my favorite.

Unlike anyone you've listened to so far, Debussy is an early modern composer, he was one of the revolutionaries who fathered the modernity.
>Debussy generally lacks that depth
For me depth is not necessarily romantic pathos, an act of contemplation has its own depth, often more than pompous tragedy, it's simply not obvious to people who are accustomed to emotional excess.

Nothing beats Chopin OP, you've already experienced the best

>For me depth is not necessarily romantic pathos
True. I don't think anyone denies that.
>an act of contemplation has its own depth, often more than pompous tragedy, it's simply not obvious to people who are accustomed to emotional excess.
It does to some extent but whether as perception or as reflection, contemplation doesn't reach the depths of understanding or tragedy proper. It's simply not obvious to people who are accustomed to justifying their own preferences regardless of merit.

Check out the works of Grieg.
youtube.com/watch?v=gq83dUB37rI
I don't understand.

lol

>contemplation doesn't reach the depths of understanding or tragedy proper.
It never tries to, they exist in different domains. Contemplation belongs to music, tragedy to theatre.

Op here and I don't even know what's going on

Going to listen to the Grieg rec

>It never tries to
Never said it does.
>Contemplation belongs to music, tragedy to theatre.
Both have musical representations.

Grieg is p spicy. Way better than that faggot cunt talentless hack deboipussy

Tbqh yet to see anything that would challenge this.

I've delved extensively into his work and it's virtually all just flawless.

Too contemporary

Also not solo piano.

I can't do this

It just keeps rambling on and on. It's the kind of solo piano I actually just can't listen to for any extended period of time, let alone enjoy.

LISZT
I
S
Z
T
youtube.com/watch?v=Aj2gFk0FoKo

Promising thus far

Also, to elaborate on this: this is the kind of music people kill themsleves to

Where's the lie tho

Okay, there were some slower parts, but this overall was superb

art tatum, liszt

What did he mean by this

Art tatum was a famous jazz pianist known for virtuoso technique, Liszt is famous for his Hungarian rhapsodies and other solo piano stuff. I recommend their music to you.

I don't want no jazz piano tf man

Idk what to tell you about Debussy OP. Try his etudes, but I guess he really isn't for you.
youtube.com/watch?v=FymZsN_NiB4
Imo if you really want to see what Debussy can do you have to go outside piano music, his string quartet and La Mer are unparalleled

Listening to more Grieg rn. Will try it out

But yeah, outside of what you already like, I can second Liszt and Ravel
youtube.com/watch?v=K9BQ1ylApto
youtube.com/watch?v=uaCPY4Plg14
Here have an underrated Rachmaninov (variation 6 is one of my favorite things for piano 3:37)
youtube.com/watch?v=XiDtLscGnn8
I changed my mind, have two. Early Rach is underrated in general Imo
youtube.com/watch?v=IDzIVgnHVwE

...

>Idk isn't tchaikovskys sp supposed to be if infinitely inferior to someone like Rachmaninov
lmao

Just in terms of piano solo dude

It's not wrong, just odd. Tchaikovsky wasn't a particularly prominent pianist, so his solo piano output is not only more limited, but less dense.
What do you like of his sp works, anything in particular?
To say something you could try Gaspard de la Nuit by Ravel, or the suite Goyescas by Enrique Granados, but i'm just throwing them there to contribute anything to be fair.

Dumka, June, valse sentimantales, chant elegiaque, to name a few

And I will add those to my playlist

Lol get out CLT-senpai

kek

>Debussy generally lacks that depth. It's like the music is tailored more towards a girl readying herself for a date with a prince or something. Idk.

>t. I never listened to Debussy outside of claire de lune or his early works

youtube.com/watch?v=Z9qsJKvwG3g
youtube.com/watch?v=apzSvM6Esdc
youtube.com/watch?v=6p1HDpf48Tg
youtube.com/watch?v=OXSWFlwX9a4
youtube.com/watch?v=fRRB9fABhpQ

pretty sure its a jab at effeminate bois on the internet, plastic bottles contaminate beverages with estrogen

>plastic bottles contaminate beverages with estrogen
So, is there a single source on that that isn't Infowars?

Okay I'll give him one more shot

...

top kek who is this?

The one and only

Has our God returned

He doesn't want to come back

Also CLT told me about griegs quartet

And holy FUCK

PLASTIC BOTTLES ARE TURNING ANONS GAY!

The number of Debussy fanboys ITT being a testament to that

Borodins and Francks are superior, but Griegs is good as well

I'm so impressed with Grieg everything

Why the fuck didn't you faggots say Grieg to begin with. I think literally one person even mentioned him

always finish on the Bach never on Debussy

holy fuck

This comment is legendary

Sup Forums help this is too good fuckkkkkk m.youtube.com/watch?v=m0ej7G0Fuug

this easily rivals Chopin

This is now a grieg thread

Post your rare griegs

d e b u ss y

Just call him Debbie

what's the hate for debussy and wagner?

They're gay as shit

I don't like fagner either

Just noise

Szymanowski - Variation in b minor
Szymanowski - Variations on a Polish Theme
Medtner ... anything by this dude.

Too dissonant for Schubert and Handel listening pussies

Hate on Handel again in my thread and see what fuckkng happens you fuckkng piece of shit

PORK
AND
BEANS

What is this meme

...

I thought this would be a great bump

>Bach is bad because he didn't write opera
heh I forgot how much of a pleb CLT was

Hey.


Shut up