Name ONE thing wrong with diversity and multiculturalism

Name ONE thing wrong with diversity and multiculturalism.

I'll wait.

As it is your position to support it the burden of proof is in you to show us what's good about it

Name ONE benefit of it first.

You get Quebec

We get more american the browner we get :^)

lol fucking bigots

Conflicting ideas.

>what if op was to be assaulted for having a drink or his gf/wife stoned for not wearing "curtains", or just plain raped?

The problem isn't immigration, the problem is that the immigrants hate our society and will stop at nothing to turn the west into the new middle east, and have no problem killing people to do it.

Crime

This

Conflict of Interests and Ethnic Blocks

niggers smell bad

>leaf

B8

REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE REPORT SAGE AND HIDE

>Conflicting ideas.
But my teacher told me different ideas makes a society better :^)

God I wish I was political back then. Fucking cunt.

Breeds cultural imperialism when allowing cultures that don't want to embrace Multicultural values, but to impose their desert culture on the rest.

It also destroys the indigenous culture.

Diversity is not a strength, its a weakness. Strength is unity and its hard to have that when you try to force wildly different groups of people to work together while having them still be different. Fuck off with your leftitst bullshit.

MUH ETHNIC FOOD

Genocide

Honestly I wonder sometimes whether fuckwads like you are actually serious. If you're being legitimately serious, not just trolling, then i will try to explain in a way that will not be beyond the comprehension of your pea sized brain. Different peoples around the world have been raised in different cultures and taught different values. Many of those values are completely incapable of mixing with western civilization. This would be no issue if migrants assimilated into the countries that they go to. But they don't. Instead they try to enforce their culture over the native one. Even this could even be a good thing, if the culture was superior to western culture. See the Germanization of slavic lands in the 9th-14th centuries for an example. But again, Islamic culture is a failed culture. It has failed to develop out of the 8th century. If it were not for the wealth from oil, middle eastern countries would still be dirt poor shitholes. Muslim migrants want to impose their failed culture on western nations, which would only drag them down to the same level. The same can be said for sub-Saharan African migrants, even though most are christian.

Muslims

I tried but I couldn't.

I give up.

Destroys social cohesion
An extra cost for accommodating the diversity.
No benefit for the extra cost.

Diversity is fine until you mix garbage into the respectable races.
Adding sandniggers and dindus to asians and whites is like adding a log of shit and a cup of piss to a cheese and ham toastie.

The less white people the more third world the country

F O O D

That's literally it though, and you don't need to import millions to get that.

i know exactly how you feel

They are all traitors, i'm beginning to think there is some traitor gene

Dilution of culture. No, brown is not a culture Patrick.

right, thats why bankers and business owner are all lobbing for it.
fucking retard

>You get Quebec
Quebec is one of the most homogeneous province in Canada so you're wrong

Ironically. racism.

Name one benefit.

It kills diversity by mixing all people into one
It kills multiculturalism through unification of culture.

Just look at US.
Just kill yourself already you fucking leaf.

He's saying "Que injustiça!", which means "That's so unfair!". To be honest, the "jus" part does sound like jew lol

...

Large groups with conflicting values and ideologies living in the same nation will inevitably lead to conflict within that nation, as one group attempts to achieve supremacy over the other

Literally nationalism you stupid fucking leaf

Bankers and business owners don't pay the added social costs, they benefit from them.

Governments take tax money from the native population (not businesses or banks) and spend it on services for immigrants (said services are provided by businesses and banks).

That's before even considering the effect on the value of labor, which you've now just made worthless by bringing in so many immigrants.

Stay at home Algeria, you're too stupid to live in any of our countries and we'd all hate you if you did.

People are tribal by nature. If a minority gets to large, they will no longer integrate and will define themselves as being against the host culture. They'll say things like "The cops are only after us", "The system is rigged against us", "We are being oppressed". In general, they will blame the host culture for all their problems and from that you can justify anything.

If people do integrate, which happens if they are a very small minority, then there's no problem, desu.

we just got a jap market in my town and now I know where to pick up the Asian hunnies

Ugly people. Like for instance, everyone in that photo.

> be white, native English speaker
> canacuck government requires me to do an englosh test
> have several other white British and Irish mates forced to do the same thing
Meanwhile, every fucking chunk and Pakistan has a relative and can get in, bypassing the entire system.

Fuck you canada, fuck you

> muh spelling
Taking a poo actually on the loo lads

If you import third world people into the country, you import third world problems into the country too.

Isn't it mainly the Pakistan here that make up insurance fraud?

No, see, that's his point. You get ethnically homogeneous communities forming inside of your previously ethnically homogeneous community and the new ones don't want anything to do with you.

this is actually pretty damning. Those asians are exactly like in their host countries.

you answered your own question

try stepping out of your igloo for once and see how deprived and cucked 'Canadians' are

Nothing. Contain different groups in relatively isolated zones so they can develop their own culture. This is the only way true multi-culturalism is possible. Assimilation is cultural merger into eventual monoculturalism. Most businesses think they gain a lot from monoculturalism and making a 'global' market, but many industries suffer, like tourism. Who wants to travel when every place on earth is the same except for climate? (With HAARP, this may no longer be true either.)

I made a pizza today despite not being Italian. How's that possible?

It's not a two way street. There is no Council of Saudi Christian Relations. There are no churches going up in muslim countries. There are no white people winning discrimination cases in China. There is no quarter of American whites living in Mexico.

This isn't multiculturalism. It's the erosion of the western European legacy through western European luxuries of tolerance. It erodes social trust, it diminishes national pride, it destroys the community, and it berates the white man.

Crime

The extermination of the things which make us unique. Eventually if multiculturalism takes over we're going to be a one race species. And then there will not be a single thing interesting about us

It destroys social cohesion. Ask Robert Putnam, he was like you once..

...

>This is the only way true multi-culturalism is possible.

Possible maybe, but no reason to do it.

People who hate my country and support terrorism shouldn't be allowed on our soil.
We fought for our freedom and those chemically unstable goat fuckers are taking it away thanks to neo-socialism.

can you define multiculturalism?

because accepting highly educated people from other parts of the world seems like a good deal to me

opening the gates for whatever turd to get in sounds awful

The zones I was referring to were countries. It's been done for ages already, and works pretty well except for the occasional war. War is usually the result of people in power trying to consolidate territory, not the common citizens of each country hating their mysterious neighbors.

Its cultural genocide.
The end goal is a mixed race of stupid consumer with no culture except shopping

CONS:
>prices increase, especially housing
>wage drop (more people to do the work -> less wage)
>massive amounts of taxes spent trying to educate/teach them the host language and for administration, more than the first generation will ever pay back
>potential clash of cultures, races or religions in the future (see every single bloody historic event)
>immigrants vote mostly left, further hastening the host country's demise
>increased crime rate (unless it's asian immigrants)
>decreased national IQ (unless it's asian immigrants)
>their home countries will never advance because the only people who would want to change left

PROS:
>diverse food
>diverse pussy
>???

>PROS:
>>diverse food
Learn to cook yourself

>>diverse pussy
They are all pink inside

maybe we can't drink beer because of multiculti one day!!!

The issue isn't that immigrants are actively trying to overthrow the government, but they are naturally attracted to other members of their own group. This can create a mini-state that is more difficult to be controlled by the true government. Immigration needs to be done at interval (with the exception of real war refugees (not the bogus ones looking for welfare)) in order to assimilate people. You are forgetting that the entire purpose of a country is to preserve one ethnicity.