What gives the US the right to invade a soverign nation? I.e. Iraq, Afghanistan (Vietnam?)?

What gives the US the right to invade a soverign nation? I.e. Iraq, Afghanistan (Vietnam?)?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

The House, Senate, and the United Nations

Probably formal declaration of war or something or other.

What are you gonna do, stop them?

the ability to do it is the right to do it

you want to argue? go ahead.

the un doesn't give the us permission or admission for dick.

yeah, tell nixon that.

Its mighty might

The US does, but it's also sanctioned by other nations under international law.

Because we can.

We didn't invade Vietnam. We assisted the South Vietnam. And Afghanistan was harboring the terrorist group which attacked us on 9/11, making them equally as guilty.

Because those countries are shitholes.

Fuck off the UN basically tells anyone whether they're okay with what someone does within the UN and whether or not they'll have negative or positive consequences. Hence why we invaded Iraq. Dumbass.

9/11

Our Military gives us the right to do whatever the fuck we want.

False flags, need more money for gun corporations

The U.S. behaves towards the rest of the world like white people behave towards black people. Presumed superiority based on nothing but delusion.

>What gives the US the right
the fact that there is no one to stop the US

And facts like a higher GDP and more powerful military.

This
It's not that the US has a right, it's just what is everyone else going to do about it?

What do you mean OP?
Why should a "sovereign" nation not be invaded?

>forgetting Libya
Really, Congress but all of those things were a mistake that the Prez at the time wanted to do and the congress just followed along. We haven't declared actual war since WWII.

Nothing.
We are a criminal nation now.

But whites can't fight

That makes you a criminal. Or get the fuck out if you think you're better than everyone else

Whites can point and click. That's all you really need to do. Why "fight" someone when you can just blow them away with the touch of a button or pull of a trigger?

true, true, but Iraq?

This. The IS has to be totally destroyed in Ryder to be opposed or stood up to. The only way to do that is with Bioweapons, which until the present decade, has only been a viable weapon in the hands of four countries. Gigs up now though, so this century, the shit hits the fan.

Cowards

Saddam's regime was an enemy.

This kind of thinking is why you'll never get anywhere.

>What gives the US the right to invade a soverign nation?

Money, Jews and nuclear weapons.

Im in the arms business and i can tell you the US are quite behind in millitary equipment

Who's gonna stop US surely not you anons

There is no right and wrong, only power and those too dumb to realize it.

oh noes, negative consequences from the un.

shakin in my sneaks atm.

btw, that strategy is really working with north korea.

Dumbass.

If you're going to roleplay, at least be a little believable.

And you're here on Sup Forums

...

>left wants to import millions of "refugees"
>there's no such things as borders or national sovereignty, you racist shitlords!
>shithole countries produces Islamic terrorists that commit mass murder and enslave people
>the left screams bloody murder about violating the sovereignty of shithole nations producing Muslim terrorists

Ask your history teacher, faggot

United Nations, when 128 countries voted to denounce President Donald Trump's decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

But, in truth, not much is going to change as a result of this vote. The Trump administration will stand by its decision.

They'll continue plans to move our embassy to Jerusalem. The moribund peace process will stay moribund. And, despite all Trump's threats, the United States will not cut off aid and assistance to every nation that voted against us.

As long as we keep funding nations, they won't do shit.

u.n. has now power over countries that can buy and pay for acceptance or forgiveness.

it's time to put down the 5th grade text book and realize money trumps all (no pun intended)

Running the world with memes.

The fact that we are unparalleled in military capabilities. It's literally impossible to invade the United States and we are the only nation on Earth that can. Effectively project our forces around the globe

No, that makes sense. An arms dealer would want little people thinking they have a chance. So that they would purchase armaments to fight this clearly corrupt country. So that the US could in turn spend more money on bringing them "freedom". This is phase 2. Phase 3 = profit

America produces terrorists but it's ok I guess

America produces lots of stuff. Watch your mouth on shit you don't understand.

Yeah, they're cowards for not fighting all wars with hand to hand combat.

That would be soooo effective. God you're a stupid nig.

absolutely nothing other than we have the power to do so.

what gives somebody the right to declare the land a "sovereign nation"? After all, it's just land .. who gave them the right to make it their land?

what a fucking stupid question

Because we got the biggest stick it's really that simple.

Soon to be released:
The official Sup Forumsarron trump sex doll!
Sign up for yours now!

God-emperor is the coward. He won't even visit London.

The imperialism CB is broken as shit,

americans have people that are trained with high powered rifles, proper camo, knowledge of the terrain, and for christs sake, they even know how to deter their scent from their target.

and that's just the hunters.

american's hunters and gun owners are the second most armed group in the world.

Naaah. Imma stick here and do my part to right this ship

You feel free to GTFO any time tho.

Doesn't matter. The US extended the Monroe doctrine to the entire world. No competitors, & no rivals will be allowed to exist. The only way to bring the US back in line with a fundtional balance of global power is to destroy it. Not hurt it, not play old timey battle games with it. A century long arms race and a policy of total military and economic domination refuses to be reasoned with, and have resulted in no reasonable options regarding it. Game theory dictates your only moves are eventually be destroyed by it, or destroy it. Only way to do that is a well-engineered, self-replicating, multi-dispersion pathogen such as a chimera virus. Immunize your own population, release, accept minimal losses while your enemy country collapses.

Afghanistan was harboring bush?

Americas hunters are fat alcoholics. They have a lot of small arms in their homes, which their kids use to shoot themselves.

Any that organize are easily located and any groups can be easily be destroyed, as they have no proper missile defenses or even monitoring or tracking systems.

They are idiots.

JK Rowling was also cowardly and hypocritical in regards to allowing immigrants to stay with her. She shamed people for not allowing immigrants in but wouldn't give money or allow some to stay in her mansion.

Like my vintage porn collection.

Maybe she offered but they were spooked by her scary magic haunted mansion.

Having bigger and more guns and the will to use them. Really It boils down to this.

Plus we only take on small countries since WW2.

Rights, morals, authority; it's all bullshit.

Same reason the government can tell you to do whatever the fuck they want you to do. Government has lots of guns and bullies that like to use them and take everything from you and throw you in jail.

Because they can.

No, she just cut off contact and stopped tweeting for a while after being quite active and admonitory

Same reason blacks dominate whites

To surround Iran and force them into a war on both fronts when we invade them. And a lot of people made a lot of money.

Label your graphs pleb I know this is supposed to be military spending, but it could literally mean anything

You don't need to be a warlord to profit off of war, you know that right? I profited off war by machining parts for tanks and ships and i am just a regular American.

It’s actually dollars OPs from different countries spend on dildos

Time for bed Putin

THE RIGHT OF CONQUEST MOTHERFUCKER

We are the world police
too bad we didn't nuke africa yet

Your moms dirtyass pussy juice

>What gives the US the right to invade a soverign nation? I.e. Iraq, Afghanistan (Vietnam?)?

Guns and bombs

>true, true, but Iraq?

I think history will look back at the Iraq invasion as a show of force to show the rest of the world that the US was not weak. It's a very common thing for nations to do throughout history.

Those amounts are irrelevant unless compared to GDP.

The invasion on Afghanistan was technically justified due to an attack on our soil. If an attack is made on one nation's ground, they have the moral authority to initiate a counterattack, so long as the means and reasons of the attack are justified, there is right intention (in Afghanistan's case, taking out a terrorist organization, and nothing more), there is definitive proof that the war can be won, it is a last resort, and the proportionality of the counterattack does not exceed the initial attack (also civilians are protected at all costs). There's also justice in waging war and justice after war but those don't matter in this case.

If the US invaded Afghan, took out the single terrorist organization without civilian casualties, and left, it would have been morally and technically correct. We did some shit that fucked up the justice of waging war, but we were given the right from an attack, and some reparations were made.

What gives the US the right? In government, the president can place troops on the ground by his own order for 90 days until it has to be signed off by Congress. Since we have the largest army though, we can kinda just say fuck it and invade regardless, claiming some bullshit (WMDs in Iraq for example), the nation, media, and government will eat it up until we do whatever the fuck we wanted to do, we say we didn't find anything, somehow doesn't break any laws regarding just war, and move on with our lives. the Invasion of Iraq and Vietnam are two examples of unjust" wars", while Afghan and WWII are examples of just wars (Wars being a broad term since we did not formally declare war in Vietnam, Korea, Afghan, or Iraq invasions)

>Formal Declaration
We haven't had that since WW2

having the more fire power and the strongest bombs

the world is a wilderness, and our society is only a facilitated order within this wilderness, the strongest ultimately survives and the one at the top makes the rules, this is only nature. Not that it is right nor wrong but that it is.

The doctrine of #MAGA u stupid cunt

You are ignorant as fuck. You don't have to be a genius to be good with a gun or a good Hunter in general. In the rural areas over 3/4ths the men hunt and even a decent number of women. Children are trained from a young age to handle arms.

Rights and morals still have a play in who we invade. Let's say we invade North Korea right now. Sure, we'd absolutely decimate them, we'd win the war (unless China gets involved, then we win the war with more casualties). After the fact, the United States will get absolutely fucked over by the United Nations and the other nations part of it for a completely unjust war. Our invasion would be deemed a preventative attack, not a preemptive war, which is considered unjust, as well as all of the shit we would do that goes against Just War Theory. Sure, the US CAN do it because they can, but the top authorities know the consequences for it, and won't do it unless we're attacked first or there's an attempt of an attack that we stop/find out about beforehand. Authority, rights, and morals still take part in who we invade.

Hm. I've lived in a rural as fuck area my whole life and in all these years I can count on one hand the # of people I know that still hunt. What state are you in user?

Minnesota. I can't think of more than a dozen people I know that DONT hunt. And I'm one of them. Yet I still have some proficiency with guns

>Iraq
First Gulf War was for Kuwait, but in the 2003 invasion, the Americans had no right. Saddam was a dick, but not a threat to USA or a US ally.

>Afghanistan
they knowingly and intentionally were harboring Al-Qaeda terrorists. 9/11 was the justification.

>Vietnam
not the same kind of invasion. USA was defending their South Vietnamese allies who got invaded by the north Vietnamese in the Vietnamese civil war. Might as well call the Korean War a US invasion of Korea cause that was the same deal, Southern US ally got invaded by nominally communist Northern country.

invade Uganda, they are on de whey to becoming the next great rival superpower

Personal gain

Vietnam was not to help Vietnam en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers

Gotta get them gains

China GDP is ~Same as U.S maybe -1-2 trillion and no $20+trillion debt.

Vietnam was for containment. Us versus communists.

In 2003 it was over "WMDs", which Iraq used against Iran in 1992, there is no doubt that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Everyone was just hoping it was an atomic bomb. It was biological weapons.

No - it was chemical weapons ... that we already knew they had because we (the West) sold them to them.

WMDs as a casus belli was a farce.

The US is criminal.

you can say the CIA is criminal, but the DIA had no hand in it

Criminality is determined by who is in power. The US is powerful and won't condemn themselves. So it's not actually criminal