Someone tell me all the differences between wizards and sorcerers in D&D pls

Someone tell me all the differences between wizards and sorcerers in D&D pls.

wizards can learn everything,
they get to memorize a set amount of spells and cannot change the spell memorized at any point.

sorcerers can only learn a small subset of spells they get more "memorizing" slots and are allowed to change spells (2x same level slot) for 1 change. (so there is a cost in doing so)

When you talk about memorizing and changing, how does that work? In 2nd ed, wizards could change the shit they memorized each day by studying the spellbook I think. Are you talking about changing on the fly?

So tl;dr sorcerers get more casts of fewer different spells?
Also what's a warlock all about and how does it fit into all this?

Prepared vs spontaneous casting
All the spells vs limited selection
Couple more slots easily mitigated by feats and ACFs

yeah I'm a 2nd ed gronag too.
I am only telling you what I picked up from 3.5 ed video games and from what people in my "group" told me about,

you are correct. with what you say, they can change on the fly they don't memorize they get their powers in a similar way to cleric (not divine though).

Warlock has made a pact with a daemon out side of that I don't know the mechanics well enough to state more.

A quick Google search will solve your issue

correct user, unless he also want's to have a conversation about it and is using this to open it up?

Warlock isnt casting at all, relies on various SLAs i think they are. Just read the fucking books

>3.5 ed video games
Which games are these?

Literally just read the Players Handbook you fuckin' mong.

Well then ask a question at the end prompting a discussion ie which is better and why?

wizards focus on the shaft while completely ignoring the balls

shitty remake of pool of radiance.
also the temple of elemental evil to name just 2. there are more but they all suck. and would not recommend them to my worst enemy. (ok maybe 3rd ed) not sure, dont really care more into 2nd ed anyway.

>don't discuss random shit on the random shit board
Is a D&D thread really that unwelcome a change from all the porn and shit?

Ahh that's a bummer. I love BG but of course that's 2nd. I'd have been curious to play a game of newer rules but not if it sucks.

Sorcerers have a certain number of spells known and can cast any spell they know as long as they have a spell slot for it(they are spontaneous casters). Wizards hace to prepare their spells at the beginning of the day but can choose from any spell in a spellbook they hace access to. Versatility is power, its why Divine Crusader is a shit PrC.

See
It's retarded to ask something that 25 seconds of googling would tell you.

temple is slightly better,
but nothing and I mean nothing comes close to BG IWD etc.

OH WAIT, NWN (and NWN2) are good, not the mmo just the games.
the graphics have aged poorly however,

I told you what you asked about, but seriously read the books. You can get them online.

>You can get them online.
Awesome, thanks man, I'll look for them.

What edition are we talking about? In 5 wizards get to memorize nearly every spell they come across, each day they get to prepare a set list of what they want to use for that day and gain spell slots per level to use on them. Sorcerers basically get a lot fewer spells but are able to "mod" them so to speak with spell points that let the spells do different things. Wizards are still op tho

>playing 5e
3.5 is the definitive D&D

wow like the sound of the mod idea.
can they do that ad hoc or is it a locked in thing?

I want to make a freeze ball (same as fire ball but also freezes the targets.)

Look hard enough and there are free pdf copies

blasphemous 2nd pre spalt books.

ITT: We all want to talk about DND, but OP gave us a shit prompt.


Also, pathfinder > DnD

DnD is for normie fucks who can't understand any detail or rule that's more complex than "do this. Don't do this."

what?
example faggot.

if you need a breakdown between two distinct classes in the player handbook, then I severely doubt you have the reading comprehension to play dnd

DnD also has far fewer classes and far less fluctuation. It's updated less and is generally a less feature rich product.

>less features
>worse character and gameplay options
>less polished gameplay

Nah sorry bro, wish it was that cool. its really basic stuff that you can change (But if you have a cool DM you might be able to do some neat stuff) Its really simple things like increasing distance, making saves for allies, making spells require no speaking or making a spell strike another enemy, that kinda thing

I should have just declared a D&D general, in retrospect, and put my question under that. My bad nigga.
I don't have the book.

Dnd is for normies my fat fucking ass. Ive played both and pathfinder is just fucking retarded, its literally like the most shit ass boring world ive ever played in, and thats in official games. Its literally hot garbage thats boring as fuck and clearly favors a specific class.

Go eat a fat cock, DickNDick faggot

So Pathfinder is basically a stat autist's wet dream? That's what I'm hearing here. I mean that in the best possible way.
That's still really cool. Different situations often call for slightly different tools, after all.

>plays DnD
>has a fat fucking ass

>Discuss

Which class is that?

nah its good for roleplayers too.

More classes more races more traits... etc etc, that helps roleplayers be able to properly recreate their intended "role"

and this is why I like 2nd ed so much,
where fluff mixes with crunch unlike any other time in dnd history.
that alone blows your bs out of the water, you can create any class you want you can set up what you want; admittedly races werent opened (so much) in second, but classes you can fuckign build your own. outside of that because of the fluff changing the crunch you have a very dinamic system, the reason all other editions after 2nd is so fucking nailed down is because of that. players windged that it was unfair and that you are chaning shit that is in the books, so it went from nebulas skills and shit to fucking "roll" playing.

>likes a shitty DnD edition with broken gameplay

Wow you really won the retard contest here didn't ya?

Read a fucking book, fag.

>DnD also has far fewer classes
They have the same number of Core base classes. With the Completes and more obscure sources it has more basr classes.
>It's updated less
When things are out of publication for a decade of course they aren't updated.
>I don't have the book.
You hace the internet, retard.

more like their intended "ROLL" amiright
that's where fucking DND went to fail town, thinking that having a stat for everything was better then role playing their way though shit.

"I say to the king yo faggot suck my cock give me 20k gold"
have high persuasion score force dm to make the knig suck cock..

yeah was a really good idea,

>You hace the internet, retard.
What do you think Sup Forums is?

You understan DCs can be set to be impossible? Is your problem rolling dice to resolve situations? That's the whole point of there being a game system, to have rules for how to resolve situations. Otherwise it was just be playing pretend by talking through things.

nah using rolls to resolve combat.
but everything else should be mostly freeform.
otherwise you are just playing a game of dice,
why even have a game around it and just roll dice for the fucking sake of rolling dice.

wizards study magic like scholars for decades and so they have a greater breadth of knowledge over a variety of magical subjects

sorcerors are naturally magical and so are badasses but only in a more limited fashion

druids have sex with animals

You guys both sound like you're arguing extremes.

yeah, I thought that was the only way he could understand because of what an extreme view he started with... I was mirroring him.

There's a place called awakenvideo that has every 3.5 pdf you could ask for. It's all hidden behind a conspiracy theory website, though.