Does Sup Forums even ban? Seen so much disturbing shit on here

Does Sup Forums even ban? Seen so much disturbing shit on here.

Where's the treshold?

Other urls found in this thread:

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

jokingly saying you're 14… I'm still pissed off about that shit.

I once got banned for just a jailbait thread but that was moot years ago

anything illegal in the United States

i see daily threads with toddlers in diapers getting cummed over.

these days just post a fully clothed child and they will ban you

Obviously not, since loli threads keep popping up daily.

Even posting in a thread a pedo stuff will get you a ban for "replying to pedo BS" 1/3 of the time. Probably always the same faggot mod I guess.

Loli isn't illegal. No actual children are harmed in the making of loli.

Are drawings illegal?


As for actual topic, i think pure cheese pizza is atleast bannable, if not "worse".

I never got loli threads b4 and I've been around Sup Forums for a long time explain is it some sort of turn on?

I guess you're literally retarded.

Are you sure about that?
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A

Governor, if someone gets turned on from playing with actual shit-poop-excrement...then loli draws are a no brainer

Good point

posting cheese pizza, real life beastiality.
or, god forbid, calling m00t a newfag. snacks is still banished to the ether for that.

it's not illegal in the us, but other countries like here in norway anything sexual with a minor is illegal. drawn, written, real pics and so on is all illegal.

>Implying moot isn't an absolute newfag

Drawings are illegal in the us and people have gone to jail for it.

Did you even read my link? it clearly states that drawn child pornography is illegal. In the US law I linked.

You didn't read the Cornell Law link, did you?

18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children
US Code

(a)In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene; or
(2)
(A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
(b)Additional Offenses.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly possesses a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene; or
(2)
(A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(2), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
(c)Nonrequired Element of Offense.—

It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist.

I mean even if you call it art, it's never going to be of "serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value"

>drawing
>cartoon

>It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist.

straight up thought police

>straight up thought police

The code states depiction, not "thought". Are you really unable to differentiate between the two?