Is art music the single biggest cancer on the music industry? It's responsible for the death of many great artists. Just imagine how great Bjork's discography would be today if she continued working on mastering her pop sensibilities after Vespertine.
Is art music the single biggest cancer on the music industry? It's responsible for the death of many great artists...
Chase Scott
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Nolan Stewart
Shut up your dumbass bait. I am going to Jerk my penis to bjork picture,
Adam Reed
Art is the biggest cancer of life. It's all been downhill since the Lascaux Cave. Don't even get me started on the Renaissance.
Alexander Lopez
good idea user.
John Sanders
better than vespertine
Charles Cruz
???
Grayson Fisher
isnt all music art?
Elijah Johnson
I want to wake up next to Björk and cook her breakfast. Any age Björk.
Charles Williams
Medulla is god-tier, last great Bjork record.
Jason Wilson
>wake up next to 11 year old bjork
n-nani!?
Joseph Anderson
>Is art music the single biggest cancer on the music industry?
nah its just a lazy cop out for artists to fuck around while they refuse to admit they suck now.
>its bad on purpose guize u don't git me reeeeeeee
u get some gems tho. like david sylvian's release and todd rundgren
Hudson Hill
Yes, but the OP clearly isn't intelligent enough to realize that, so why even bring it up?
Nathaniel Phillips
Ironic, given that it's a blatant ripoff of someone else's album...
Dominic Evans
Who's?
Samuel Fisher
art is taking someone elses work and doing it even better, and she clearly did given that "someone else" is too irrelevant to even be named in your post
Jonathan Green
this thread belongs to the unwashed masses
first of all, bjork makes art-pop
art-music's definition applies to what most people call "classical music"
yall are fucking stupid as fuck
Gabriel Gomez
>tfw Bjork is almost 52
Is it wrong that I'd still hit it? Seriously I would lick her old wrinkly ass if she wanted me to. I'd give that bitch the rimjob of the century.
Justin Gonzalez
>too irrelevant to even be named
Nope. Left it out of my post on purpose inorder to make it a leading statement. That way someone would ask who, and then I'd have an excuse to post a music link and make this thread actually topical to this board.
And lo and behold...
Claire Hamill's 1986 album Voices:
Voices (1986): youtube.com
James Cooper
>he thinks björk would rip this off
i know it's bait but... wew...
Jose Parker
>Is it wrong that I'd still hit it?
No. She takes care of herself and still looks good.
Colton Parker
I wonder if she shaves down there..
Brody Wilson
Maybe you should go find out ;)
Jackson Thomas
One day, user, one day.
Matthew Nelson
>he thinks björk would rip this off
>The title refers to the fact that the album's mostly-instrumental music is entirely a capella, created by sampling and multi-tracking Hamill's voice.
en.wikipedia.org
> The album is almost entirely a cappella and constructed with human vocals.
en.wikipedia.org
>i know it's bait
Sample tracks from each:
youtube.com
youtube.com
In this case, the only bait here is your denial.
Nathan Edwards
>album shares a concept with another album
>that means the album ripped off said album
Ryan Bennett
>shares a concept
In this case the shared concept happens to be the entire point of both albums (presenting the human voice as THE all-encompassing musical instrument.) So yes - a blatant ripoff.
And in terms of musical content too:
youtube.com
youtube.com
Joseph Ward
lol okay
John Sanders
>one came first
>everything after is a rip off
Jaxson Walker
this. also stop acting like
>(presenting the human voice as THE all-encompassing musical instrument.)
isn't a very simple concept to base an album off of, and something that two different people could both think of and produce.
Kayden Brooks
>isn't a very simple concept to base an album off of
Then why hasn't it been done more often? Why are these two albums virtually the ONLY examples of artists doing this?