8values.github.io

8values.github.io

Post results

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism?wprov=sfla1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism?wprov=sfla1
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>8values.github.io
>Post results
I got capitalist fascist.
What does that mean?

...

i keep getting neo-liberal, this is bullshit, neo-liberalism doesn't even exist

...

>libertarian socialist
Oxymoron much? Kek.
Fuck socialist scum.

Basically Pinochet but the site creator is too retarded to realise that fascism and capitalism are incompatible.

...

I dont see why fascism and capitalism are incompatible. Pretty sure both the italians and nazi germany had free markets, to a certain extent atleast. I think any aggitation towards capitalism was more of the global variety and unfethered capitalism.

They were corporatist states, which is entirely different to the capitalist/liberalist view on economics.

who /enlightened/ here

>libertarian communism
Cant he fucking change the name of the ideologies to not have some kind of antithetic result

What did (((they))) mean by this

...

...

...

not you

>collectivism

...

no

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism?wprov=sfla1
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-libertarianism?wprov=sfla1

See where it says "Communism" ?

t. Hillary Clinton
>DemSoc
Ayy lmao
Hello comrades
Spooky lad

Hillary isn't a neo-liberal

I did the test the other day, and basically it was:

>hyper-capitalist
>hyper-nationalist
>hyper-authoritarian
>half-progressive, half-traditionalist

But it's somewhat meaningless because the questions are way too general, for example: should religion play a role in government? Well... it depends on the religion, and it depends on the government.

Libertarianism in communism and don't contradict each other even in the slightest. Do you not understand what these terms mean?

>wanting to be buttfucked by a clergy once again

aight

the only sensible answer

Got Radcen

>hillary isn't a neo-liberal

Do you not understand how communism cant not be authoritarian ? Communism is about a revolution and single party states and all that jazz, how does it not contradict thz ideal of liberty of libertarianism ?

kys

I'm a Jew, so I ultimately don't care if you can't deal with your own priests :^)

But then your religion already plays a role in our government :^)

not feeling like it, sorry

Only lenisnists and maoist think the state should step in and take over to redisribute everything at some random point. There are many other strains of socialists/communists that think you can do it totally without the state.

you do realise communists and anarchists have, theoretically, the same endgoal, right?

Eh, kind of made me think

I thought I would be more for Equality, Nation and Tradition

...

what happens if I want to set up a store
Am I free to sell my stuff for a profit? Then it's not communist. Will I be shut down? Then it's not anarchist

Wew lads. You'd think Pierre here would've heard of the Paris Commune.

cerĂ³n por favor

...

But systems like syndicalism are seperate from communism for me, i do not like the use of communism as an umbrella term like fascism can be used to describe Pinochet or Fujimori. Communism is Marxism/Leninism for me.

He's right, but everyone has started "neoliberalism" wrong. It is supposed to imply laissez faire economics. Now it just means...left wing? idk

>shut it down: yes/no?

>neoliberal
>left wing
oh, only in America

>8values.github.io


Im pretty sure this means i'm just a racint anarchist or something

...

In the US only commies ever use that word and they think moderate left-wing redistributionists are basically the same as Milton Friedman

Are you a Putinist? If not, what would be the score of a typical Putin voter?

>d they think moderate left-wing redistributionists


Hillary isnt that.

She is closer to Milton and to pinochet than to any form of socialism

only gommies use that word here to, but they aren't talking about themselves. Neoliberals might have some concern towards social problems, but they are as right as you can be economically

>they are as right as you can be economically

Better be right than wrong tbqh

...

...

...

>Are you a Putinist?
No, i'm not. This fucking commie manlet trying to destroy my country.
>What would be the score of a typical Putin voter?
Equality 70-80 > Markets (Because he's poor and wanna free shit)
Nation 70-90 > World
Liberty < 70-100 Authority (Depends on level of brainwashing, he needs someone to fuck him hard)
Tradition 55-60 > Progress
Long story short, average Putinlet voter is 30-40 bald middle class plant worker with low income, cringe wife with kids and probably a beer belly.

a 30-40 yrs old*

I see, thanks.

...

>Stalinism

More like Nazism, no?

no

I'm a radical centrist
Only retards hold strong convictions

...

No

if he was an actual nazi he will be economically centrist to pro market

Though he is not too far from being an Asserite (Nasserite/Strasserite)

...

...

Yes, but Stalinism or Maoism aren't traditional at all...

Are you a Brunei national or an expat?

I'm ethnic nationalist
> Closest match: Centrist

Why the heck is your second line displaying "might/peace" instead of "nation/world"?

neck yourselves immediately

THE CALL THAT SHATTERED IDEOLOGY

...

when do i get my medal

tfw no party in your cunt offers a low regulation, free economy and a big welfare state

>talks shit
>doesn't post anything

>free economy
>big welfare state

user...

>free economy and a big welfare state

You can combine high taxes and big spending on transfers to lower income people with a government that otherwise lets businesses and consumers do what they want

...

>a militant atheist social justice lolbertarian
How many fedoras are you wearing right now?

>t. /r/donald/pol/cuck user

me:

They are to current progressive standards. A lot of new marxists consider Stalin to be conservative, even though he persecuted the church and allowed for wanton abortion in the USSR. It's just that if they percieve it as bad, it's regressive and probably "conservative"

>Athiest
I'm not Atheist or agnostic.
>Militant
What?
>SJW
Not all progressives are "Trump is literally Hitler" tumblrinas
>Libertard
never bitched about THEM ROADS

>high taxes
>lets businesses and consumers do what they want

Can Bernie still win?

just a reminder

>I'm not Atheist or agnostic.
That surprises me a lot. I can understand a religious person being left leaning economically, but for you to be extremely progressive it means you are fine with shit like abortion and with the death of the church. That's not very christian. What's your religious persuasion?
>Militant
Why not?
>Not all progressives are "Trump is literally Hitler" tumblrinas
Most of them are.
>never bitched about THEM ROADS
No, apparently you are some sort of corporate technocrat. Kind of bloodless, but I can see the logic. Hillary or Johnson?

right wing populism
xd

Why would you want Sanders to win? He's a social democrat and therefore a capitalist pig. Liberal democracy is bourgeoisie affectation, comrade.

twoxchromosomes is for women, not leftism

they are the same essentially

>not leftism
Leftism is now for women and feminine men. Stop being a sexist macho shitlord and get on with the program.

I don't understand what you're confused about. There's a big difference between banning certain kinds of buildings and not allowing people with a low marginal product to get jobs thanks to minimum wage or giving huge tax preferences to random shit because it sounds good in a TV ad and just having a VAT and using the proceeds to give poor people money

>Religion
Christian Deist. Religion and science should not be seen as butting heads
>militarist
Everyone is equal, regardless of National background except dumbasses
>Progressive
Everyone is equal regardless of racial, gender, or orientation except dumbasses
>Corporate
Three things need to be protected: The Consumer, the Worker, and the environment. Otherwise run whatever the Hell you want
>Technocrat
Everyone should be treated equal except dumbasses
>Hillary or Johnson
Fuck both of them.

>Religion and science should not be seen as butting heads
No but religion and progressive ideology certainly should. Your religion's philosophy should inform you a bit on your morality, and things like prostitution and abortion are very hard to justify as a christian, and drugs as well. You can easily rationalize those as perfectly acceptable in civilized society, but if you do so and completely ignore traditional wisdom something tells me that you're larping a bit as a christian and aren't really religious.
>The Consumer, the Worker, and the environment. Otherwise run whatever the Hell you want
No higher purpuse? No value of culture or the arts? Language? Some tribalist sensibilitites are inevitable to most human groups, user. Full globalism is either naive and nonsensical, or a pretense for totalitarian fascism.
>Everyone should be treated equal except dumbasses
Most workers are dumbasses. Have you actually talked to common people? And by technocrat, I implyed that you don't really have a lot of faith in democracy, and it seems that I was right.