50,000

>50,000
i don't think I've even seen 50,000 images of regular porn

Other urls found in this thread:

judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-v-watkins-and-others.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

then you haven't been here long enough

Someone's new around here

Holy Puck.

Multiply the number of minutes you’ve watched a video by at least 30

BAM

Why did he have so much?

Another Sup Forumstard gone

50,000? Jesus christ thats Sup Forums numbers.

pedophiles have a tendency to hoard child porn because its so rare to acquire. Coupled with the guilt some feel, they often delete their own collections in a way to change their ways, only to eventually come back and regret ever deleting in the first place. Hence the hoarding. This is similar to addiction but it is important to not confuse the two.

50,000!!!!

50,000 pictures of normal porn is nothing.
50,000 illegal images is kind of a lot.

But 27 terabytes. That's nearly impossible. Yet Ian Watkins somehow managed to pull it off.
>tfw you read what his password was

judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-v-watkins-and-others.pdf

50,000 tho

its a setup

>50,000 pictures of normal porn is nothing.
Dude in my 10 years of being on Sup Forums and browsing porn excessively, I haven't even reached 20,000 images of anything

>get 5+ years in prison for literal pictures
>never touched, assaulted, or harmed anyone
>merely thrown in jail for files that displayed a certain series of pixels when opened
>the American "justice" system

>looks at photos
>forced to kill self

great freedoms america

How was he caught tho?

> Downloads sexual photos of children
Should have been raped and killed in prison instead of suiciding

>implying this is only an American thing
yeah, ok, because pedophiles are so accepted in your shithole country, Igor

>justifying pedophilia for any reason

>looks at photos
>should be raped and killed

>thoughts should be illegal

"thoughts" are a lot different than creating a market that leads to the rape of children
although I do agree that he shouldn't have suicided

Can we get a link to that specific article? The first one I read said he had an image of a minor.

>suicide because of a few 1's and 0's

>creating a market that leads to the rape of children
[Citation Needed]

This
It's pretty scary

When you watch videos of ISIS beheading people it creates a market to see people being killed.

The pictures exist... and since he went out of his way to find 50k pictures there's obviously a demand for it. So somebody is abusing a child and taking pictures so other people can have them.

is this faggot jew actually justifying child pornography?

Can't tell if bait or you're actually that retarded.

>video games don't cause violence
>violent movies don't cause violence
>pictures of children cause sexual assault

>i don't think I've even seen 50,000 images of regular porn
fucking normies

So because footage of 9/11 exists that means there is a market for terrorism?

The cops will take every frame of every video and call that a picture. So one video can be thousands of pictures. And then you'll got o prison longer than murderers and be shunned worse than those who actually committed a crime

Not a justification just pointing out a logical fallacy. Keep up son.

Yes, because people didn't rape children before the advent of the Internet or photography. And most rapists totally rape to make money off of distributing photographs, not to satisfy their own sexual perversion.

>demand doesn't inspire supply
Riiiiggghhtttt

Are you stupid?

These pictures aren't a public event. Somebody is abusing children and taking pictures of them naked. PEOPLE WANT THESE PICTURES. So the rapists and pedophiles provide them with photos by abusing children. Are you seriously this stupid?

well another faggot done killed its self, Allah be praised

There is a market for it
There is no currency being exchanged

Pick one

>implying people actually rape children just to sell pictures
>implying these people would stop raping children if they weren't able to sell pictures

50,000 pornographic images of any type seems excessive...

But he lost me at prepubescent. That's fucking vile. I like hairless pussy as much as the next guy, but I want the girl to be able to grow pubes THEN wax it off.

>creating a market
fucking retard. cp will exist regardless of whether or not it is in any kind of demand.

Who said anything about selling, cuntbag?
People want the pictures so people upload them. Has nothing to do with money,

Well since we got internet in my house when I turned 12, I'm sure I've seen a few million images of "regular porn", let alone fetish stuff
I can't imagine how hard it was for kids to get quality material pre-1999. Now we're just a few keystrokes away from anything we can imagine. so spoiled

we had to find old pornos hidden in the woods

>I FUK KIDZ
nigga i'm dead

>dealing with urges in a non-violent way is criminal activity
>get thrown in jail for not harming children

You're the dumbest person I've ever seen on Sup Forums.

>inb4 hurr durr my retardation is trolling

>i don't think I've even seen 50,000 images of regular porn

So, let's say the average porn video is shot at 24 fps, which is pretty standard for video. Let's exclude videos exclusively shot at 60fps for the sake of argument.

24fps x 60 seconds = 1,440 frames of video per minute.

50,000/1440=34.722

Rounding up a bit, if you've seen more than 34 minutes and 45 seconds of porn in your whole life, then you've definitely seen more than 50,000 images since each frame is literally a singular image.

>pictures exist because the child was abused
>hahah just pix no one got hurt xPPP

> Supporting degeneracy
Just watch normal porn like the rest of us

>taking pictures of them naked
So you're against nudism then? Also, you haven't mentioned how this all leads to actual rape.

I see at least a couple hundred regular porn picutres on page one of Sup Forums every single day, and I have a lot of filters to block the reoccurring trash ones like pics you should share, and celeb threads.

In order to stop child abuse we have to ban all video cameras and regular cameras

Pedo's are mindless monsters
Pedo's share content freely out of the goodness of their hearts

Pick one

??

These kids aren't nudist you fucking moron. They are being ABUSED and pictures are taken of their naked bodies. The children are most likely forced into sexual/suggestive positions.

>pedo spotted
Literally KYS. By consuming pedo porn you are encouraging it’s prpduction.

I can’t believe you’re so stupid that someone needs to explain that to you.

There is a point where having pictures of a death/murder doesn't make you a murderer, having pictures of porn doesn't make you a rapist or assaulter. People have, are, and will continue to rape and molest, sometimes the victims are kids, and nobody is doing it just to record it and put it online, they're doing it to get off first and foremost. You don't think women or kids in athens were getting raped? It's harder to chisel in stone than to hit the red dot on your camera application. You couldn't make copies and put it on the outernet
the point is, it's always going to happen but nowadays the people who get in trouble are the ones who had no decision in its creation, they just saw it and now they're in jail while the actual creators of it are safe

>forced to kill self
What?

Again [Citation Needed]

I've seen pictures and videos of people being tortured and murdered. does that make me a murderer?

Taking pictures in public of anything the eye can see it a 1st Amendment protected right, are you anti-American you commie scum?

Going out of your way to look up and download child pornography 100% makes you a pedophile.

stop using moronic analogies

worse. you are contributing to the market for it.

>so instead of 1000 pedos fapping to 10 kids being abused, you want 1000 pedos going out and actually abuse 1000 kids
this fucking logic

>Going out of your way to look up and download gore videos 100% makes you a murderer.

>is called child pornography
>needs citation to prove they're being used in pornographic manner
>being this fucking retarded

The real question here is glee cursed?
If so who's next?
I hope the wheelchair bastard is

I can go to live leak and watch kids hit by cars, trains and baseball bats all day

It makes you fucking weird, and that you obviously need a therapist.

Are you willing to pay money to have more of those videos made?

If not, your analogy is fallacious.

his ex girlfriend narked to the coppers

agreed. how many years of prison should you have tho?

can someone please explain to me how this happens? how does a normal young decent looking person be a pedophile? especially when they've been on tv and shit. Ive been seeing this alot. i would never expect in a million years for this guy to be a pedo with cp. and im talking about just one image, not 50 fucking thousand... wtf.

or maybe if they were never exposed to it they may have never developed pedo tendencies.

>hollywood
guaranteed molested by older men

>excusing the abuse of children with hypotheticals

You’re scum.

>tfw I'm contributing to the mexican cartel

How is that at all the same?

Pedophilia means to be attracted to children. So you going out of your way to look up these naked children because they turn you on makes you a fuckin pedophile.

being a pedophile is a thought crime

>complains about hypotheticals
>thinks looking at pictures causes children to be hurt

>Claims all photos and videos are the product of violent abuse
>Can't post any proof of such claims
Oh boy I'm glad you don't work in the legal field...

shut the fuck up.

>Download cp
>Get arrested
>Act as own lawyer
>Get access to evidence
>Legally own and possess cp from then on

Problem?

fair enough. so you are cool with jailing people for their thoughts and desires?

looking and collecting the pictures creates a demand for the product. that in turn increases the supply.

What if you're attracted to people being brutally murdered? Is that somehow less fucked up?

He thinks that people are that hungry to be "internet famous" that they'll commit a crime that will get them a life sentence and murdered in prison just for upvotes. The people who take these pictures would be doing this shit anyway, there's just technology now

>children cannot consent

>Coupled with the guilt some feel, they often delete their own collections in a way to change their ways, only to eventually come back and regret ever deleting in the first place. Hence the hoarding.

Shit, I do that with bookmarking regular, legal porn and I don't even consider myself a deviant or an addict, but I just erase my shit every once in a while to start from scratch. I guess that makes sense.

Fuck that guy for being a pedo, though.

yeah well ive found out recently that hollywood is pure evil scum but still i would expect some person like harvey winestein not this

the government says they can't, so they can't. end of subject. don't like it? go buy an island and live there

drunk pedo pls go

Whats the difference in penalty between having 1 pornographic photo of a minor and having 5, or 20, or 100, or 15000, or 50000?

Like how would the courts decide what to do with you

How's Tor these days? Thinking about checking out the cp scene over there. Normal porn does nothing for me anymore.

Children cannot consent to photos and videos? So all those parents that take photos of their kids in the bath are pedos to you?

young attractive kids are targeted pretty heavily.

they charge you per image. so they threaten you with 10000 years in prison unless you plea to a lesser crime. Shit you could be innocent, you'll still plea guilty to it.

>thoughts and desires
>Actually looking up child pornography