Being part of an ethnic group where everyone is similar is really that good like Sup Forums says or it's overrated?

Being part of an ethnic group where everyone is similar is really that good like Sup Forums says or it's overrated?

Do your neighbours really care about you? Do you help a lot each other? Can you trust in your countrymen in another countries?

Sometimes I wish I was part of an ethnic group so I would be able to join Sup Forums jokes, comparsions or circlejerks.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/04/the_downside_of_diversity/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

being part of a homogenous country is like living in communism since you are forced to only live, fuck and choose one type of girl. Fuck that. Brazil is the best country in the world

Brazil IS comunist, a mess, corrupt and failed shithole where you can't trust in anyone.

Nah, we are too catholic for being commie

This o
s a socialist shithole where all parties are gommies.

Do you enjoy being around people like you?

if so: yes Sup Forums is right
if no: your melting pot of degeneracy is gr8

i took a trip abroad and they have a point. there is more... social cohesion. I think its why nippon is how it is.

yes, nippon refused to import immigrants to preserve their social cohesion.

just cause they look like oyu doesnt mean they are similar to you

I envy countries that are homogenous because they seem to have more social unity, but I think they interact worse with foreigners or people who are different.

I think most of latin america is so racially inhomogeneous it's actually homogeneous.

And as far as I understand from documentaries on Argentina, social bonds there are very similar to here.
It really depends though. Some people you can trust, some people not. It's not like a big happy family, but it's probably better than places like the US where the blacks live in different districts from the whites and they all feel alienated to eachother.

If you're an extremely superficial, shallow person then ethnic heterogeny is synonymous with excitement and diversity of people to you

no homo

Different races are different huh.

but race is just a social construct :^)

>I think most of latin america is so racially inhomogeneous it's actually homogeneous.

You mean Spanish speaking countries in general like Mexico, Peru, Chile, etc.

Brazil is awful diverse. Almost US tier with less whites.

This is why every Brazilian thread end with chimp outs.

Ah yes, Brazil is Sup Forums. We are exactly like the US. See the only way for a country to become developed is to genocide inferior races and have an homogenous country. Being normie and happy lowers IQ and brings degeneracy to the world. I am white and not brazilian btw Please respect my heritage

Brazil threads ends with chimpouts because of selfhaters baiting and attentionwhore fags biting them.

its not superficial faggot. its not easy to understand unless you have lived in both environments.

You mean like an ethnically homogeneous country?
Homogeneous groups are always better. There is no doubt that an ethnically homogeneous population reduces crime, increases productivity and trust.

People like people who they share things in common with, and a common history and appearance is a huge one.

>being happy in this corrupt lawless shithole

What a monkey

If one were to be miserable at every problem he would only be happy at his death

Yeah it is superficial and yeah I have lived in both. There is nothing diverse or wonderful about violent submental nigs or ethnic enclaves of viets and east asians. It's a superficial mind that thinks you need a physically diverse people to see a diversity of opinion.

I misunderstood you. I agree.

>There is nothing diverse or wonderful about violent submental nigs or ethnic enclaves of viets and east asians.
What if there are no enclaves at all and all share the same culture?

Aren't you "the Americas" of Europe? You can range from Catherine Zeta Jones to Lily Cole.

>What if there are no enclaves at all and all share the same culture?

>you barely can trust in Brazilians abroad
>Braziliand barrly form groups bigger than 200 people abroad
>same culture

you really got trust issues my friend. You sound really autistic.

This

Oh yeah, let's pretend we all have the same culture, same habits, etc, etc.

Let's pretend a favelado is the same shit as a random nikkei selling pastels abroad

>Let's pretend a favelado is the same shit as a random nikkei selling pastels abroad
I literally have in my friends group, a japanese guy, an arab guy from a muslim family and a italian surname guy. We all drink go to the brothels and do the same shit

>call him autist
>say Bobby's world things

homogeneous regions in the new world (or at least Canada) tend to represent a lack of economic prosperity, as there would be far more immigration from all over, rather than just one or two nationalities making up a reason

you see it a lot out in eastern Canada, I mean Newfoundland's ~530k population is roughly 1% non-white/native, most of them you see in the city on work permits or as an international student in the uni

t. enjoys eastern canada

how come? this is so common in Brazil that it's ridiculous, to believe there are different cultures in Brazil you need to be really really autistic. We aren't the US my friend, people that said that have never left the country and buy shit Sup Forums and other stupid people say here

Economic prosperity and diversity means rich Jews, high criminality and cheap wages.

Canada is the best example of a country thriving despite inhomogenity. Almost zero crime, great assimilation rates, some of the safest metropolitan areas in the world and all of that despite high immigration. Toronto is 50% immigrants and it's still a great place to live, ignoring the weather.

It's just because they only import high-skilled and rich immigrants from third world countries. Canada also have some non-white territories with the highest homicide rates in NA.

Just wait until Trudeau open their borders to everyone.

>some non-white territories with the highest homicide rates in NA.
You mean the innuit/natives in the north?

This.
You just have to look at an income distribution chart of a place like NYC.

>Economic prosperity and diversity means rich Jews, high criminality and cheap wages

We already have all this plus high corruption and hopeless people about their nation

drawbacks and perks

i don't have a bond with anyone outside the local town or community my parents originated from and they are no different from others here, but there is a broader community that stretches multiple cities and so-on. my parents would certainly have a place to stay in like 30 different cities across north america since they have friends there (big diaspora community).

why are you singling us out britcuck, hardly any of us in pakistan island edition and we assimilate better than any other racially different minority wherever we are.

appearance is absolutely irrelevant, language and culture are the only relevant components of ethnicity. Putting so-called "white" people in one country obviously wouldn't work, for example. What I'm saying is homogeneity of appearance isn't important, homogeneity of culture is.

Fuck Apezil

>Ethnic group
>Not cultural group

That's your problem familia

>Being part of an ethnic group where everyone is similar is really that good like Sup Forums says or it's overrated?

Overrated. You still have a lot of differences many of which people will fight, segregate and killover.

1) I feel like living with the same race is safer for me. but also much more boring.

2) No, my neighbor never talk to me before

3) I don't really trust my own countrymen, but they are still more trustworthy than foreigner

There is much less difference when they're all genetically more similar to you. people still fight over stuff, but its less than when you force them together with totally alien groups.

Japan has lower crime rate compared with multicultural western countries. I believe it's because of being homogeneous country.

>Being part of an ethnic group where everyone is similar is really that good like Sup Forums says or it's overrated?
It's good. I literally moved out from UK where I had a well paid job, d moved back to Warsaw. I couldn't stand all those stinking shitskins.
Moving to UK literally made me racist, and I used to be a liberall....

I don't know who is more untrustworthy, Poles or shitskins

You ungratefull hohoĊ‚

If you cry in a street, I doubt "your family" will help or care about you so it's not that great.

archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/04/the_downside_of_diversity/
>But a massive new study, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America, has concluded just the opposite. Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam -- famous for "Bowling Alone," his 2000 book on declining civic engagement -- has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings. The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings.

Every old lady would stop and ask me whats wrong user,heck even kids. What's wrong with your people.

>Do your neighbours really care about you?
Yes
>Do you help a lot each other?
Yes
>Can you trust in your countrymen in another countries?
Very

Lies, lies and lies. You live in a dictatorship.

>Do your neighbours really care about you?
kinda. They'd care if I die and I believe they would help me in emergencies (ie hospitalization, hopefullly) but we're not friend and do only a minuter of small talk every other day.
But my previous neighbors were a piece of shit human being and a weird that wouldn't talk unless forced. And before that, in my previous place, there was a nice friendly dude and a bitter cunt in her 30s that was trying to pick fights over nothing.

>Do you help a lot each other?
Define "help". Nobody will ignore a dead body in the street, very few people will ignore a medical emergency in a public place, but very few people will help you with food or money and almost nobody with shelter if you're not close relatives or really close friends.

>Can you trust in your countrymen in another countries?
I wouldn't, there have been many cases of explotiation by fellow countrymen. The take away their passports and force them to work pretty much for free, you know the drill.
Still I'd try to connect with others.

wow I need to install a spell-checking program or something.

Explain