So who has smaller dicks? Asians or Indians?

So who has smaller dicks? Asians or Indians?

Other urls found in this thread:

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6161691.stm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Indians are Asians...

You just went full retard.

>thousand man survey
>1.3 billion population of india
fake news click bate faggot stop thinking about cock you nigger

Indians are from the Asian subcontinent, but they are referred to as 'Asian' here.

What exactly do you call the yellow squinty eyed people vs Indians to differentiate them? Do you just call them both Asians?

rice niggers and sand niggers you twit

Indians are Asian. Europoor education everyone.

>news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6161691.stm

> Over 1,200 volunteers from the length and breadth of the country had their penises measured precisely, down to the last millimetre.

>The scientists even checked their sample was representative of India as a whole in terms of class, religion and urban and rural dwellers.

Yes, I'm sure you know better on how to get an adequate sample size than a qualified scientist.

>sand niggers

what the fuck? Indians aren't sand niggers, that's middle easterners, if anything Indians are curry niggers

"Asians or Indians?"
Asians or Asians is more like it

Statistically Indians have the smallest dicks in the world.

So how do you differentiate between Chinese/Japanese/Vitnemese etc Asian vs Indian Asian?

No one refers to Indians as 'Asians' here.

Chinknigger
Animenigger
Tunnelnigger
Currynigger

>qualified scientist
>studying dick size
That is not a sufficient sample size you gigantic faggot.

>

semantics, stop keeping this cancer thread going.

why is everyone on this site obessed with dick size/hot attractive men are/how tall they are?

gay as fuck

>some retard from Sup Forums
>vs
>actual scientist with a degree

Yep, I'm sure I know whose opinion I'm going to listen to.

>thinks you need a bigger sample size for a bigger population
Not how any of this works

ok faggot lets do some math
>3.2 billion / 1000
>1 person represents 3,200,000
But technically let divide that by two
>1 curry nigger represents 1,600,000 curry niggers.

>"sounds good to me because science"

You dont need a bigger sample size for a different size populous, just enough to find a reliable average.

That's not how it works at all. Jesus. Go learn some statistics.

Yeah and in another study 40% of American men claimed that condoms have or usually slip off. Basically the condom companies have been testing/checking on volunteers and as such the numbers are skewed towards men that are a bit more well, proud. Random testing shows that the condom manufacturer tests are about 15%too large.

its okay man i know you right dont listen to these fags who never took stats

depends on the scales.

gotta love how everyone's a nigger to Sup Forums

rice nigger
sand nigger
curry nigger
euro nigger
poor nigger
rich nigger
white nigger
drug nigger

and then there's niggers

The larger the sample size, the more statistically significant it is.
The margin of error would be well over 80 percent in this particular case.
Thought that was pretty obvious.

How long have you been here/your just now figuring this out?

What's really going to blow your mind is when you notice the link from between how closeted gay and insecure this place is and how white supremacist and Trump loving it is. Really makes you think...

mystery niggas

it doesn't have to scale linearly for a given confidence level, you are completely wrong

u got sum nerve comin at me on shabbat. u better watch ur mouth... before me n my jewish niggas come beat ur ass