Anarchy for sale

>anarchy for sale
Were the Dead Kennedys right?

there's literally nothing incompatible between anarchism and capitalism

you're thinking of anarcho-communism, which is basically roving biker gangs: the philosophy

Except the fact private property exists purely due to the state....

>there's literally nothing incompatible between anarchism and capitalism
Are you brain damaged?

Capitalism is the natural state of a free market. Without a powerful State altering the market, capitalism is not just compatible with anarchy but inherent.

This is some low-hanging bait.

...

Private property exists because I'll fucking shoot you, just as it has for tens of thousands of years without a modern state.

This lol
Ancomms are Fucking delusional

What's your point? They're a bunch of wackos who don't actually have any plan past smashing the nearest garbage can and vandalizing churches (but never mosques).

aren't they ancaps ?

even if they aren't, selling merchandise to support yourselves is fine, so long as they know where the goods came from and who made them... They're perpetually stuck in high school anarchy though, which is embarassing because they're like 40 years old or some shit.

Some anarchist "intellectual" would tell you anarchists believe in the elimination of all power structures, capitalism being the system of the absolute power structure
I don't know how these morons expect to ever achieve what they want without a centralised state to enforce their ideals, the complete antithesis to their ideology

Read Nozick cowboy

Anarchocapitalists believe that private entities should have the capabilities to control people, but not the state. For some reason. It's a pretty glaring contradiction, because at least state officials are generally elected or otherwise appointed by people who were elected. Whereas people who control private industries were generally born into it and never rise up from the slums as so many "self-made" millionaires and billionaires falsely claim.

But anarchism in general is fucking silly.

Spotted the Marxist-Anarchist.
Not everyone applies your blanket definition of anarchy as opposition to "oppressive structures;" right-wing anarchists (AnCaps and the like) have more opposition to the institution of the state rather than other voluntary institutions. Capitalism is a voluntaru institution, therefore for AnCaps and other anarchists, capitalism is a-ok.

...

>Capitalism is a voluntaru institution
But it isn't really "voluntary" by virtue of it being undemocratic. I don't quite understand what you mean by "voluntary" in this context.

Loved Jello, I went to his talks once. Beautiful, well intentioned man.
Everything is different now.

this

>democracy is voluntary
either you don't understand democracy or you have legitimate brain damage

Democratic does not mean voluntary. Capitalism is voluntary because you can choose to exchange goods and services by your own free will. If you don't want to participate, you aren't required to.
Yes, not participating does make it difficult to meet your basic needs, but that's not nature requiring you to participate, it's you being offered a much simpler option which is participating.

Is the jury still out on Al Jourgensen's antifa song?
is it satire?

Ancaps don't think anyone should have power over anyone else, don't they? That's they're whole NAP schtick. As in, in they're perfect society, all economic transactions will take place between two independent, mutually beneficial parties.

Not that it would actually play out like that at all

A marxist would argue that capitalism is involuntary for the workers who give their means of production to the elite, where wages are lower than the cost of labour for commodity owners to gain surplus value while leaving workers in a weaker position for choice.
Either way, everyone is missing the point of the OP. Jello Biafra predicted that leftist revolution would become a commodity.

Marxist philosophy is always so painful to read