Establishment has finished hijacking the libertarian party in response to Trump nomination

>establishment has finished hijacking the libertarian party in response to Trump nomination
>libertarianism is finally being splintered by kikes and feminist "intellectuals"

Don't pretend you didn't see this coming.

christophercantwell.com/2014/04/11/steve-horwitz-difference-humor-racism/

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Zes6i38Y67Q
fee.org/articles/against-libertarian-brutalism/
bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2015/12/scholars-without-borders/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Reminder that the Libertarian Party's official position on the second amendment is gun ownership oppresses and disenfranchises non gun owners, and should be abolished.

>this triggers the libertarian

I've never heard of any of those people.

Wait what? Seriously?

Sauce?

That sounds a lot like socialism.

>finally being splintered by kikes and feminist "intellectuals"
Thats been happening for years, beltway libertarians have been completely taken over by SJWs. CATO will gladly have fellows who supported the murder of millions in wars, but if someone has ever said anything that could even be interpreted as anti gay or racist they will never be accepted.

The Libertarian Party is a left wing abomination.

>Libertarian Party
>Not the Constituional Libertarian Party
I can see why

Sup Forums seemed to know over a year ago when they turned pretty hard against libertarians here

...

Ever since Gary came out as anti-Trump I sorta expected this, fucking kike.

He's a traitor to us Constitutionalist Libertarians. I predicted this happening when Gary wanted open borders and going against Trump. They're so desperate that they even want the dem votes

Shit this triggers me, but as long as the liberal party see how much a faggot they're guys are they go for trump maybe.
Also why is OPS pick look like Go!animate?

They're on the wrong side of the thin vs. thick libertarian schism. They're the kind of people Molyneux broke away from.

youtube.com/watch?v=Zes6i38Y67Q

fee.org/articles/against-libertarian-brutalism/

With positions like these, Johnson is going to steal disaffected Bernouts instead of taking anything from Trump.

I don't care about the party I just cared about the beliefs. If the party's beliefs change then I will just switch to a different party that has my beliefs.

he's got the dude weed lmao crowd. he's sure to win. just look at kekanada

>libertarianism is finally being splintered by kikes and feminist "intellectuals
>finally
It was always this way and leftist libertarians have existed since Rothbard made that alliance. Libertarianism was always a mistaken detour down a dead end path that leads only to leftism. It's truly the cancer of the "Right" and the reason for so much stagnation in this intellectual sphere. Jews are literally incapable of making an ideology without it somehow looping back into their larger narrative in the end.

I know steve-o. He's pretty divisive among libertarians, but what can you do. At least he softens the face of things to the outside world.

He's a pretty basic example of a libertarian/austrian who is NOT a social conservative and makes no attempt to assuage buthurt paleo-conservatives.

I don't think that's a bad thing when you consider what happened to the tea party movement.

((
Buehler
Bier
Reisenwit
Geankopus
Horwitz
Zwolinski
))

You mean communist. Is there any difference between communists and lolbertarians? Let's compare:

Both are used by Jews to disrupt social cohesion and consolidate the resources/power of a country into the hands of a rootless few.

Both are obviously doomed to failure due to human nature, but a commie or libertarian will ignore facts and claim that their idealized fantasy would definitely work well.

Both advocate open borders and their biggest proponents are always jews or crypto-jews hiding in universities.

Both hold nothing but disgust for national identity and feel it should be done away with in favor of a globalist one-world state.

Both love the idea of internationalist jews plundering their countries with impunity as long as they get to blather on about kike-theory and feel like elite geniuses.

I think it is clear there is literally no difference.

Muh NAP

Muh property

Muh voluntary interactions

Of course he's divisive. He laments how libertarianism isn't pluralistic enough because libertarians are too mean. He wants to turn the people who subscribe to libertarian ideology, white men, into meek cucks in the naive hope that it will gain allies in women and niggers. He's either delusional or just another subversive Jew who enjoys the company of leftist academics.

Yep, Jew:
bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2015/12/scholars-without-borders/

Well he's definitely under no illusions that he's jewish...

I dunno, I've seen the split between him and another jewish fellow, Ezra Levant, all in the same conference, so I think it's pretty complicated. Ezra talks about the jews being oppressed a heck of a lot more than Horwitz does, and Ezra's more the tea party type libertarian. Naturally, they hate each other. And then you have Walter Block (wiki him) who I daresay also has a pretty different position. I think Sup Forums might like him the most.

I like how he's explored relationships/families from an economic perspective as opposed to one culture or another's periodic cultural notions about what it should be.

He's not the only one who talks about libertarians seeming mean though. I also think they have a point that it's an image problem that sorely needs to be addressed.

This still pisses me off. I hope Austin Peterson backs Trump after this.

>Walter Block
This turboyid literally wrote a book defending blackmailers, scammers, and pimps all in the name of a super autistic application of the NAP. He's the jewiest jew who ever jewed.

Maybe, but I just meant that if you compared him to Horwitz, they'd disagree on a lot of things. he's also argued for voluntary slavery.

His autism about the NAP was why I thought he might have some Sup Forums fans senpai

>I like how he's explored relationships/families from an economic perspective as opposed to one culture

I liked alot of his work before as well. The problem is when he refuses to see the logical conclusion of degenerate family structures or open-borders (he thinks there's no empirical evidence for open immigration causing problems.)

>I also think they have a point that it's an image problem that sorely needs to be addressed.

Trump supposedly has an image problem as well, yet he's the Republican nominee despite how problematic he is in Horwitz's world. Politics is a hotbed of civil war and drama, and it works to the benefit of those participating in such.