How does a stateless society build roads and build basic infraestructure and basic shit like healthcare and other basic...

How does a stateless society build roads and build basic infraestructure and basic shit like healthcare and other basic shit that is too expensive to run for a local comunity without a fucking form of organization (state)?

The answer is simple, anarchy is retarded.

>I'm even considering anarchy

Anarchy is a theory in a poly sci class and nothing more. Even the most basic African nigger tribes had some form of government, even if it was a theocracy or pig worship.

Anarchy doesn't get shit done.

Not an argument.

Trust funds

how do you keep this from corrupt assholes?

Anarchy doesn't exist in the sense that first world "anarchists" fantise about.

Anarchy wouldn't mean no government , it would mean mob rule.

how do you stop this mob rule from making gangs and tribes from appearing?

Even in jail there are tribes.
there are tribes among kids, be it pokemays, gamers, emos, metalfags, nerds, etc.

Law enforcement agency that protects your contracts

You all elect one tribe to have the final say on what the others can do. They should have the ultimate say and ability to use force. Maybe rotate members out of these delusional positions every few years for fairness. This is the only way anarchy could work.

...

So basically anarchy is having a bunch or agencies/organizations to provide services to the population, I'm sure there will be a central organization that pool the population resources among these organizations.

So, basically anarchy works if they have a sort of state, but let's not call it a state.

I dunno.

>le ISIS is not a state meme

It doesn't, libertarians only have a tenuous grip on reality.

Because when people need roads they build them?

>le ISIS is not a state meme
They are a state. That's the point, I think.

how do you trade them the resources to make such roads?

ok.

I haven't found any example of sucessfull anarchy society sempai.

A stateless society could not function to any degree unless every human was flawless, which is not possible with this specie.

In theory it would work with flawless humans because they'd contribute all energy and resources they could, knowing fully well that everyone else is doing the exact same and that they are thus promoting their next of kin and prolonging the existence of humanity as well as accelerating their advancements. Those who drain more resources than they contribute would of course commit honourable suicide to keep society going at maximum speed. In such a society there would be no problem constructing tools that everyone benefits from, as that would be the most efficient way of improving humanity.

This does not work in reality, as humans are awful beings that cannot ever strive for such flawlessness and perfection.

states are already a form of anarchy, but you (((democratically))) elect people that are supposed to be good at managing resources and the means of production
and so far most of the world leaders agree on this
there's far more to it desu but i don't really know anything about politics

>How does a stateless society build roads and build basic infraestructure

Easy, we would elect a group of industry leaders who will do public works with funds citizens donate to their causes, all of these works would be to benefit the economy so it's nothing like the wasteful system we have now.

I built a mile long road from one side of my farm to the other using a digger, a dumper truck and my tractor.

That's my point

Anarchy in the sense of being free from subjugation doesn't exist which is something even my history teacher in highschool didn't seem to understand

This is literally democracy. It would be autistic to tear down government to replace it with some sort of "house rule"

They buy the materials. This isnt new. Construction, mining, and forestry companies have been doing exactly this for 200 years

Need a road to somewhere? No road there? Get it done. I have 7 trucks that need to move in 3 weeks

you see vertical hierarchy even among animals.
Even hens in farms have social herarchies.

I haven't seen any example of any complex society that isn't vertical even among animals (social animals).

did you show him that farm animals tend to form social herarchies?

animals (humans included) tend to naturally form hierarchies.

in a stateless society i can build a yuge wall around whatever i consider my land and only let high iq, peaceful people inside
anyone that does an act of agression either on a person on the wall or the wall itself gets neutralized by a guard (funded with voluntary donations, cause smart people know you need defense against niggers) and killed if they persist

How do you keep international trade them?

imagine you have no natural resource or have no oil.

>companie
so, a private organization (a mini state)?

i'm not arguing that there is no vertical hierarchy
i see a *perfect* an-cap society as just a more honest hierarchy then whatever kind the current "democratic" and "socialist" are

The idea of the flawless humanity is one where subjects such as you would cease to exist far before perfection, thus making it a non-problem. There is no state, but there is the tribe, and the tribe is a collectivist tribe, and it is out to get you if you do not adhere to perfection. Being flawless however would mean that the tribe would not have to do anything to rid themselves of unwanted individuals, as they would do it themselves because it would pain them very much to be a hurdle in the way of the progress of the rest of their species.

A stateless society with the common man as you describe, would just lead to a state forming immediately. What you propose is literally a form of state, feudalism is not far from it.

It's there any good introduction to anarchy?

Every time I ponder on it, it comes as extremelly retarded.

>huh duh let's have some kind of net of organizations to provide services
>huh duh this isn't a state because I say so

>I'm sure there will be a central organization that pool the population resources among these organizations
Why not several and people can choose which one they want to? Like banks?
Not even a libertarian, genuinly wondering.

what's diferent from the current system where there are diferent political parties and difrerent companies providing services you can choose from?

>How does a stateless society build roads and build basic infraestructure and basic shit like healthcare and other basic shit that is too expensive to run for a local comunity without a fucking form of organization (state)?

A group of people who want a road somewhere pay contractors to build a road. Dead simple.

Because it is retarded. All collectivist animals, humans included, have sorts of hierarchy. It doesn't matter if it's called a state or a corporation. It's same either way.

>So, basically anarchy works if they have a sort of state, but let's not call it a state.

Sure. It's better to think of "anarcho"-capitalism as a confederation of monarchies with modern business practices.

Then you can stop getting caught up on the "anarchy" part and focus on the arguments for why privately owned government would be better than communally-owned government (popular sovereignty).

In tribes individuals usually do feel a lot of guilt if they do dishonorable things. If you know more then half of the people in your tribe personally you wouldn't want to disappoint them

ok, a road is a fucking retarded example.

how do you build shit that is extremelly expensive as space travel, nuclear reactors or intercontinental bridges?

stay safe penezuela, good luck.

I do agree that democracy is inefficient as fuck and some good leader will make development faster than a rotation of mediocre ones.

I would rather have infinite renewal of power with periodical elections, so if a leader it's good, then you keep it, if it's bad you end it.

kek malparido.

A.I sends robots to fix the road.

Private organizations can't mandatorily make you buy their things with taxes at the risk of imprisonment like an actual state does.