Thoughts?

thoughts?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Mexico
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Northumbria_Police_manhunt
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_Great_Britain
independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/acid-attacks-uk-highest-world-figures-police-revealed-a8098236.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Sydney_hostage_crisis
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/untruth
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

you sold your balls OP

Yea its a country full of pussies. The cops don't carry guns, Muslims are running all over town beating the fuck out of people, praising their devil of hate allah, and raping everybody and everything in sight. Idk about you but I'd sure love a gun in my hands when they break into my home

How many niggers kill other niggers and non niggers on a daily basis even though they are a minuscule percent of our population? Ohhh that's right its never covered in the media. More niggers are shot on a daily basis in Chicago than all the school shooting combined (

All guns are banned in mexico, then it's a safe country too. Amirite ?

I too prefer school stabbings

Ignoring all the bait about sandwogs in our country, the truth is, we just don't have a firearms history and as such, don't have the same issues the US has.

The UK is a very safe place for most of us to live, and our police do a good job with the kit they've got.

I've been to New York, Miami and Chicago and quite frankly, keep your shithole to yourself.

I don't think it's saying

No guns = safe country

more like

No guns = safer country

Then Swiss where there is basically no gun regulation is a way more dangerous country to live in compared to france or UK. Amirite ?

your being too simplistic m80, they have far too many guns sloshing round the system, even if they banned it tomorrow, it wouldnt stop guns being an issue...................here gun ownership has never been big
Also its fucking written into their constitution that virtually any fucker can own a gun.......whether mad, bad or sad
finally their national rifle association is one of the most powerful political lobbyists in the world....pours 100s of millions into republican coffers to keep gun legislation off the agenda and deflect the issues............we never had anything remotely like that as an obstacle.
This is like the 18th mass shooting in the us this year alone............its never gonna stop and theyre never going to change.........i dont even know why this shit is news anymore.
If dead kids isnt enough of a watershed moment then nothing ever will be! Lets move on

Jesus, you sound just like trump, spouting off untruths and opinion as if it were fact; too lazy to do any research to find the truth.

Article 10 of the their constitution allows for gun ownership. The government has limited certain calibers to only the military and the police, but individuals can still own guns. They limit the "bearing" of arms, but do not disallow it.

The UK is a safe place for **MOST** of us to live"
Most......Moron

You go to any large city in your brown shitstain of a place to live and you have the same stats as NY CHI Miama etc...However there is much more rapes, and cops getting beat up because noone can defend themselves when a criminal brandishes a weapon/gun. Go praise allah your piece of garbage.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Mexico

>limitations to individuals—including hunting and shooting sport participants, property and personal protection personnel such as bodyguards, security officers, private security, and extending to VIPs (diplomats, public officials, celebrities)

That means gun regulation nignog

Be good goy give me your guns

is this bate? Why do you keep comparing country's, it's not that binary.

Just because no guns means a safer country doesnt mean a country with no guns is safer than a country with guns, it's just an improvement in most cases.

Regulation is different than what the OP originally stated: "All guns are banned in mexico"

You can't tell the difference between regulated and banned??? Holy shit, the US education system really is failing its youth.

you posted this already today

I'm french and i'm not OP jamal

>No guns
>Safer

What would prevent school shootings ? Gun-free zones or pic-related ?

sure kid

sure kid

this retarded

It was already posted? haven't been on today.
Sorry

Not this stupid autist, again. This is just bad trolling.

>Safer than before
not
>Safer than every country where this is not the case

Will give up my guns as an American once the police and military do as well.

This guy says otherwise:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Northumbria_Police_manhunt

So you got rid of guns and went to knifes and mass suicide

Say it with me
MOVING THE GOAL POSTS
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_Great_Britain

>Not answering the question

>their national rifle association is one of the most powerful political lobbyists in the world....pours 100s of millions into republican coffers to keep gun legislation off the agenda and deflect the issues

Not true. During the past election cycle the NRA spent a total of $834,165 on Federal candidates. Planned Parenthood spent $4,056,822. So an org that specializes in actually killing babies contributes 4 million dollars and no one says shit. NRA donates far less but somehow they are the biggest problem out there. Just doesn't make sense.

wheres the pic of the "1400 raped childs by arabs over years and years in Englands and nobody said anything cause they might be called racist" when you need it??

Hey! At least, you dont have any school shooting, good work UK...

>not op

...

darling the link that you posted contradicts your point. Gun crimes don't convert to other violent crimes when you ban guns.

Killing with knives is qualitatively different to killing with guns. Different perpetrators and different victims are associated with each.

no guns = no crazy people dreaming about really use it. no the american culture about guns. other kinds of violence? yes.

Fuck saved the thumbnail i'm retarded

thanks mate

Think about how small of a country the UK is and how few schools they actually have.

Dude, STFU and don't be an idiot, you're proving their point for them. Your own "proof" showed that in all of 2017 there was one terrorist attack and two other "massacres" (on with 8 fatalities, the other with 6). They're going to use your own post to point out that there were 18 US school shootings in just the first two months of 2018, as opposed to only 2 mass killings in the UK in all of 2017.

Shut up, man...don't make it easy for them.

It's your fucking fault.
No one's allowed to say anything because it's not just being seen as racist. It'll cost you your job, which will fuck up you and your family's future.
Thanks to americuck tumblrinas getting all pissy because one of you said "nigger" no one's allowed to comment, even if it's a fact.

Muslims love you because you can't shoot them. Enjoy your diversity

We've actually had 30 this year; just 18 mass school shootings. That said, the rest of what you've said is spot on.

Not true, check your facts.

Guns are a human right

> 18

On January 25, a Mobile, Alabama, high school student fired a gun on campus. No one was injured. On January 26, in Dearborn, Michigan, shots were fired from a car in a parking lot; no injuries were reported.

On February 5, in Maplewood, Minnesota, a third-grader pulled the trigger on a cop's gun. No one was injured. On February 8, in New York, a shot was fired inside Metropolitan High School. No one was injured.

Here are the cases where someone was injured other than the shooter:

January 22, Italy, Texas: a teenage girl was wounded by shots from a semi-automatic handgun. The same day, in Gentilly, Louisiana, a 14-year-old boy was injured in a shooting. February 1, Los Angeles, California: five children were injured in an accidental shooting. February 5, Maryland: a teenager was shot and injured outside of a high school.

The fatalities:

January 20, Winston-Salem, North Carolina: A football player was shot and killed. January 23, Benton, Kentucky: Two people were killed and another 15 were shot at Marshall County High School. January 31, a fight broke out at a Pennsylvania high school; a 32-year-old man was shot and later died.

So of the 17 “school shootings” before Wednesday’s shooting; three students died; roughly 30-35 were injured.

do we want guns or rape in our countries

No. They are a very dangerous object that should to be regulated.

don't objectify guns

Shit, only three kids? Well fuck it. 35 kids just got tougher and we need that, 'Murica! 35 tough kids, is worth three dead.

Im a gun owner an enthusiast in the US and a father who is deeply concerned about school safety and the apparent increase in school/mass shootings.
that being said there are a few things that need to be considered
While mass/school shooting seems to have had a slight increase they are nothing new merely more publicized .
The 2nd amendment isnt there just so people can shoot shit and get their rocks off. more a counterbalance to government power. I would love to live in a world where guns were not needed and we could trust our government implicitly but I do not beleive we can here in the US. Our government is made up mostly of the richest and most dishonest US citizens that I feel would become tyrannical over a population unable to resist.
And most importantly Banning guns or even if we had never been allowed to posses them would never keep them out of the hands of criminals in any society.
That being said I believe that gun control needs to be stricter. not necessarily limiting calibers etc but silencers for example. There is no need for a private citizen to have one. Full auto=no. Im aware FA is banned but not in all areas for pre-ban weapons. Limitations like that. and most importantly I beleive that psych evaluations should be a port of owning a firearm and all firearms should be licensed.
As well as STIFF punishment for not keeping stored weapons in a secure manure so unlicensed individuals cant gain access.
my 2 cents

Come on, you know when a nice semi auto walks in, you ain't checkin out that slide?

let them have gun. It's called natural selection at this point.

any americunt from Chicago?? One of the most anti guns city? How are the crimes and school shootings there??

otoh, how is the crime rates where the school shootings?? and in another similar towns/cities??

Cause its very easy to say "buah, buah, mass shooting, buah, buah" What if 90/100 crimes were avoided by an armed civilian??

I prefer guns. You know about it when it happens...

since 2016 there have been 500+ acid attacks in the uk, i personally would much rather get shot then end up a melty face monster

wish there were more like you user

sauce

hard to be safe from guns when the country next door is full of yanks that sell guns to tijuana after a 10 mile drive

independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/acid-attacks-uk-highest-world-figures-police-revealed-a8098236.html 2 attacks A DAY

>More than 400 such attacks were recorded in the six months to April – an average of two a day.

maybe with a gun they can defences themself against this shit...
or get killed easily, I dont know...

thanks for the sauce mate

20 years ago a man walked into a cafe and killed 30 adults
Australia hasn't had a massacre since they banned guns
>Americas face when

This is all predicated that massacres are bad, and that future fucking assholes ARENT being killed in the process. Maybe a couple nice people are being lost, but that's collateral damage.

We'll keep our guns. Let the "mass" shootings continue I say. Too many fucking people in this country to begin with.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Sydney_hostage_crisis

You might not get "a massacre", but almost, and with "banned guns"
go fuck your giant spiders "lier"...

Any number greater than 0 of dead or injured is bad, by no means would I say, "oh it was just 3, not a big deal" ...but if you want to have a letgit discussion then you should keep the facts legit, and the "18 mass shootings" reports are complete BS.

Now how do you want to handle the fact that 99% all the mass shooting over that last several years have been in "gun free zones", hmm?

>Muslims are running all over town beating the fuck out of people, praising their devil of hate allah, and raping everybody and everything in sigh

literally does not happen

>Australia
you mean a country that was literally made when the british dumped criminals on an island? yeah i wouldn't want them having guns either

Never laughed that hard

Because America doesn't have gun control? Any small time effect is essentially useless without a national effort. Gun control works and has worked in every first world national effort. Boys with toys is the curse of the country. Let's also not forget this last mass shooting actually had a school with armed guards that had no effect.

Is that what the uneducated ate calling fallacies these days? Untruth? Cute.

...

Remember me? Thank god we have strict gun control in Norway...

guys what if, now hear me out on this, what if...its not a gun problem? But a mental health problem? Other country just look after these people better, there is more work done keeping these people from finally going over the edge

1st, some cities in US have gun control, learn something...

2nd, If a guy get bullied day by day and one day he said "go fuck yourself world" grab a gun (maybe fathers hunting shotgun) and kill so many people, is cause of him and gun control or cause the bullies??

just to know your opinion

OK, so the 20 dead in two months in the US school shootings is better UK's 14 non-terrorist deaths due to attacks in all of 2017? Remember, this is comparing only school shootings in the US against ALL non-terrorist massacres in the UK (as posted in the original link of the poster).

OK, so you won't be butthurt, I'll include the terrorist fatalities. UK: 37 deaths in mass action in ALL of 2017. US: 20 deaths in 2 months of 2018. Hell, if you want to compare apples to apples, the ONE Las Vegas shooting in 2017 beat out ALL of the UK mass attacks. 58 to 37.

You may want to argue different facts.

His Chicago point was accurate though.

That is the laziest bait I've read in years. Dude, make a fucking effort.

nice strawman.............that shit is everyday in the states
ill never understand why you guys are so defensive, do you want more people to die? do you care?

Thanks user

As a side note I also feel like a lot of the violence in our society is due to a rise in mental health problems. People just seam to be getting crazier these days.
consider all of the massive amounts of chemicals and toxins people are exposed to in modern times compared to the past.They are in everything from twinkies to just the air we breath. with food being so heavily processed and everything else whos to say what the long term effects these chemicals have on a mind?
And these days with social media the way it is everyone is so disconnected from reality staring at their screens that its messing people up. The irony isnt lost on me that im doing right now.
and on top of everything the education system in the US is HORRIBLE.
Its really just a sad scary world these days

I know this is a bullshit thread. But consider the following:

Guns are banned. Zero guns in the world. Period. That's the scenario
Let's say I wanna do some harm to my fellow man.
Living in a major city, fireworks are often on sale, from the back of trucks, all over the place all year round.
Same goes for glass. Pressure cookes. Ball bearings. And anything else I may need to craft an IED.

With the joy of the internet (and even before) there are all sorts of easy access tutorials/manuals on how to quickly and effectively construct such devices with ordinary every day things! Don't even really need to go the dangerous harvesting gunpowder from fireworks route.

Hell, an enterprising young mind would buy out a bunch of bleach and ammonia and spread some good old fashioned mustard gas through the school.

In short, guns don't kill people; people kill people.
Figure out how to prevent the nutter from doing nutty things, and problem solved.

No, learn to read. I said NATIONAL. Meaning the whole country. Cities, schools, even whole states with gun control doesn't accomplish anything. Buddy can legally buy a gun in an hour over a state, city line, whatever and there ya go, ineffective.

I like this thinking. I'd go a couple steps further:

1. Every gun would need to be licensed (think of it like a title for a vehicle), and the registration should be carried if the gun is carried. Any gun not properly licensed could be confiscated on the spot.

2. The owners of all registered weapons would be held criminally and civilly liable for any damage caused by their weapons (yes, if it gets stolen, that's pretty bad for the gun owner...but, he/she should have kept it locked up better when not in use).

3. Failure to comply with firearm regulations would be a temporary (or even permanent) loss of right to own/carry a firearm. To make it harder on the criminal class, this carries with it a parole stipulation that a valid agency could search the parolee's property at any time (without a warrant) to see if guns are there.

best polite guy ive ever seen here

i think youre missing the payments directly to senators and congressmen - literally 100s of millions of dollars.
i think john mcain is paid the most but plenty of others have their snout in the torugh

Aren't all these already in place? Or are there some states that do not?
Because this sounds about right for Canada.
>Mandatory trigger locks too.
>For hunting rifles, proper storage and handling while in transit is enforced by M&R on the trails too.

wut? English, Pablo

Awww...poor butthurt idiot. Doesn't know that untruth is a valid English word:

merriam-webster.com/dictionary/untruth

Nope. Not in place.

That was me
I agree with what youre thinking. the only thing im not 100% on is if the weapon was stolen. For instance i have a small gun safe that i keep my handguns in bolted in a closet. to me ive done everything in my power to ensure its secure. it would be dificlut to take and cut open but not impossible. if someone were to break in when im out of town etc and take it I wouldnt feel it was fair to be held responsible. I think gun safes and locks used in conjunction should be mandatory

Goddam you are one stupid motherfucker, but you are American so what can I expect

I actually agree to with you. I do believe that if more than reasonable precautions were taken, than there is nothing you could do. If you don't leave the weapons in the open available for theft (or a child/visitor) able to access them, you could be exempt from this rule. Gun safes would be a great exception.

BTW, before anybody screams that keeping guns in a safe won't keep them safe during a home invasion, this rule wouldn't preclude a weapon from being left out in the open. The owner would just be responsible for any damages that follow from said action. The freedom is still there, but there is more accountability put in place.

>I actually agree to with you.

Jumping ahead of the "Learn English" crowd:
Sorry, I originally typed "agree to your thoughts" but messed up my edit.

>there's more than 1 gun per person in the US
>they dont use them to topple their corrupt congress and 2 party system
>mfw americunts hate socialists but actually have a communist system
>mfw the gov makes them fat by inserting corn syrup in their food
>mfw the gov pays docs to get them hooked on Xannax to keep em docile
>mfw all their guns are useless cause they cant even get up
>mfw its always a school shooting because their are the only ones not fat yet to shoot up the place

Thoughts and prayers ;))))))))