Based Pinochet thread

Based Pinochet thread

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=zhrYY3ocQ5o
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_System_(economic_plan)
youtube.com/watch?v=RAJ_n_CMAjU
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Left_Movement_(Chile)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Jimmy_Carter#Human_rights
sandiegouniontribune.com/uniontrib/20060416/news_mz1e16billin.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chile–Russia_relations
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Mi General

tool of Kissinger the same jew that killed Rhodesia and turned the US into Israel's bitch

USA puppet

also a jew puppet of Milton Friedman

youtube.com/watch?v=zhrYY3ocQ5o

Soon

The left has destroyed the 'no violence for political beliefs' argument


Press H for helicopters

...

HHHHHHHHHHHHH

>silenced everyone who opposed him by dropping them out of helicopters/outright murdering them in the streets and in their homes
>poisoned and killed Chile's most celebrated poet

Fucking edgy teens. Sup Forums will simultaneously lament the rise of EU totalitarianism whilst celebrating a brutal dictator. Kill yourselves

>poet
And we should care why?

Chile is one of the only functioning South American countries today because of what he did.

...

killing leftists is fine

but killing for kikes isn't ok

All he did was make Chile better off for a few Friedmanites

>throwing the leftard menace out of helicopters is the same as putting them into power

stupid straya poster

Yes, let's try the failed systems of protectionism and socialism instead, you fucking mongrol.

Based Straya.

I doubt any of you fuckers went to Chile.
It's a shithole. It has the largest wealth-gap of any Latin American country, on par with Africa.

Its not like the extreme left hasnt done the same gruesome shit.
Che and Castro are portrait as revolutionary freedom fighters by the far left and they did fucked up shit too.

not caring about or dismissing poetry is shitting on your very history, on the very foundations of every right you take for granted, on every moral you deem worthy, on every action you deem just and every piece of knowledge you possess
"And first, truly, to all them that, professing learning, inveigh against poetry may be justly objected that they go very near to ungratefulness, to seek to deface that which, in the noblest nations and languages that are known, hath been the first light-giver to ignorance, and first nurse, whose milk by little and little enabled them to feed afterwards of tougher knowledges."

...

> failed systems of protectionism

kys

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_System_(economic_plan)

The American nationalist protectionist system built this country

All you neolib faggots should just off yourselves.

>quoting sidney is 'shitposting' now

They failed miserably in making people poorer than they otherwise would have been.
Brilliant strategy - forcing people to only buy from certain people. Why not just put a wall around the entire country? I'm sure that will "spur" economic growth.

>killing some faggot poet

sounds based bro

Libertarians have a hard time understanding art due to autism

>America from 1810-1970
>the country with the highest wages and living standards in the world
>poor


KEK
EKE
KEK

Seriously go kill yourself

>nationalist system built this country
>not Europe suiciding all of its industrial capabilities in world wars

I think you might be retarded, and your use of "kys" confirms that.

>reading is too hard; the post

>all these words
>said nothing

>muh income equality
Not an argument. Chile's poor are wealthier than sub-Saharan Africa's rich. Afghanistan has lower income inequality and wealth disparity than the US, for fuck's sake. You left wing blowhards really need to put that bullshit in context before you spout it like the parrot you are.

>the US was only rich after WW2
>people didn't immigrate by the boatloads to the US from the 1800s-1920s so they could get the highest wages and living standards on earth

look at this faggot and laugh

I know you can't read libertarians typically have verbal problems, again, due to the autism.

>sub-Saharan Africa

That's not an accomplishment because SSA is full of niggers

That's like bragging your city has less rape than Detroit.

Read the post I was replying to, you fucking spastic.

I'm going to let the chain of posts speak for themselves.

Thanks for doing your own character assassination for me~

>Chile's poor are wealthier than sub-Saharan Africa's rich.
lol they aren't.
Chile is not USA.

Its GDP per capita is the same as Gabon and lower than Russia.

>You left wing blowhards really need to put that bullshit in context
I am putting it in context.
Statist Russia is both wealthier and more egalitarian than Chile. And Russia is a shithole too.

But you all go MUH PINOCHET and repeat memes, like I said you haven't been in chile like I did and seen the shanty towns first hand.

>>poisoned and killed Chile's most celebrated poet
Overrated asslicker faggot.

who's this asshole?

viejo hijo de mil putas, algunos chilenos de mierda le siguen besando el culo al pinocho, tanta gente realmente inocente murió por este viejo hijo de re mil putas. Vayanse a la mierda todos ustedes, viva Allende!!!!!!!!!!!!

also Germany also had a protectionist system prior to WW2 and what a surprise they had the strongest economy in Europe!

The UK on the other hand had """free trade"""" and it's empire collapsed. So much for your retarded ideology.

not an argument

It's a bad comparison to compare overall wealth with niggers

>muh shanty towns
>muh $11k per capita GDP that belongs mostly to white businessmen in the oil industry

lmao I think you might be one of those blind trumptards who thinks protectionism is actually a good idea and just looks away when presented with actual arguments.

>the US was only rich after WW2

Before the first world war, the USA had nowhere near the industrial capacity of either Germany, France, or the UK. As these countries tore themselves apart, killed their entire young male population, and shifted their industry entirely to arms manufacture, US companies filled the gap in the market.

>people didn't immigrate by the boatloads to the US from the 1800s-1920s so they could get the highest wages and living standards on earth

You know who those people were who were coming here? Starving Irish peasants. Starving Russian peasants. Persecuted Jews. Chinese peasants who were sick of being poor. Before the global recession in the 30's, most of the people coming here would have been better off anywhere but home.

chile's economy didn't even improve until after pinochet died and his successors rolled back his failed neoliberal capitalist policies.

Pls get out of Antofagasta

>Before the first world war, the USA had nowhere near the industrial capacity of either Germany, France, or the UK.

stop shitposting on Sup Forums and read a book.

...

>nobody talk about videla

>muh shanty towns
>muh $11k per capita GDP that belongs mostly to white businessmen in the copper industry

question, does all chilean on Sup Forums are pro-pinochet or not?

No, you can't just kill everyone who disagree with you.

Cant Allende the pinochet

>first i was like

as a socialist country myself i think sometime its justified to protect your country from that cancer through

Socialists will defend this.

>the USA had nowhere near the industrial capacity of either Germany, France, or the UK

that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

>Persecuted Jews

oy vey I wonder why you're a libertarian.

Tbh current leftists make me support Pinochet more just because of their retardness about it, otherwise he kinda sold us but we probably would have been worse otherwise. Ideally he should have deposed Allende, banned communism and give democracy a year after at most.

>muh land reform

If Allende wasn't deposed, Chile would be just as bad as Venezuela has become under "socialism of the 21st century".

No one is more cancerous than a nigger who's willing to kill someone else for having a different opinion.

Most Chileans are anti-Pinochet because they are educated by Marxist teachers who do not tell the true history.

Pinochet is more admired outside of Chile than within it.

youtube.com/watch?v=RAJ_n_CMAjU

maybe creating a constitution that was banning it, and be the general to make sure no one can amend it

by how much was the death roll?

That's not true.

The thing about Pinochet is that unlike so many other 20th century dictators, he didn't believe he had the answer to everything, so he mostly gave wide liberty to different intellectuals to experiment in the country, while keeping control over key areas.

The most famous experiment was the economic liberalism of the Chicago Boys (which didn't extend to Codelco, which was kept under state control), but actually, the one that I find most interesting was the political reorganization of the country under the ideas of Jaime Guzmán.

Guzmán was not a typical Jewish neoliberal puppet. He was a reactionary Catholic, influenced by Carlism and he implemented a social corporatist vision of civil society which I consider more influential for Chile's later success than the economic reforms. Besides, his Constitution guarantees Chilean stability (which is why commies hate it and want to change so they can transform Chile into Andean Venezuela).

I rolled a 9, a 14 and a 14. So I live.

i dont think that less than 10k death is that bad

so how much really?

its 3000, that fucking nothing

Why'd you guys get rid of the dictablanda? The ABC countries could've blow out gommies together forever ;_;

It should be remembered that Pinochet was dismantling a 10.000 paramilitary army.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Left_Movement_(Chile)

To do it by only killing 3.000 people is not being a bloodthirsty tyrant, it's actually a sign of restraint.

>3000 dead commies

Because Jimmy Carter pressured South American military regimes to "liberalize" in order to not impose sanctions.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Jimmy_Carter#Human_rights

I honestly don't know what you're even saying though. My D&D reference was obviously lost.
"Death roll"?

obviously, fascistic capitalism bring way less death than communism because your ennemies are mostly degenerate jealous of the rich
while communism is against human psycology and so kill way more

Intredasting.

But isn't he one of 15 leaders who help define "dirty wars" and international hegemony.

Wasn't there links to Ford Foundation and Chicago School of Economics?

hm same profile in pic...

>>>/oven/>>>

>Jaime Guzmán.
>Guzmán was not a typical Jewish neoliberal puppet. He was a reactionary Catholic, influenced by Carlism and he implemented a social corporatist vision of civil society which I consider more influential for Chile's later success than the economic reforms. Besides, his Constitution guarantees Chilean stability (which is why commies hate it and want to change so they can transform Chile into Andean Venezuela).

Any chance this was Beta Test later implemented in USA??

Or did US implement UK Trade Model, European Investment & Trade & Immigration Models to suppress the wages/compensation/cost of labor.... and use of foreign resources, skills, labor, outsourcing, and use of offshore banking?

you like to be offended.

You should thank me. Save the image.

Seek mental help, seriously.

No chance at all. What Guzmán did in Chile was the opposite of what was going on in the U.S. at the same time and ever since.

Guzmán strenghtened Chilean civil society and intermediary institution, even at the expense of big government and big corporations.

Not sure where the hell you live. USA is a Military Republic with democracy only at the local, county, state level. There are no controls on the DNC or RNC which are composed of corporations defined by the IRS as either nonprofits or for profits.

Military Republic, just ask the power of the Govt & Military authority of Veterans or active duty military.

- In the USA we don't use the Constiution in the most part, Patriarchy, Matriarchy, submission to authority has replaced education, media, antitrust legislation, and conflict of interest in our courts, health care, regulators, and our privatized congress.

nice image though. Do Austrians write about corruption and the effect on economics? Doesn't seem like they recognize the power of networks, collaboration, racketeering, and corruption.

Was there an imbalance of wealth extracted to foreign imports or a policy to strengthen tariffs and capture wealth in domestic companies/manufacturing?

I get a little forgetful.

Usually under a dictatorship you see wealth going to the wealthy who also are like Patrons who own the banks, manufacturing, mining, agricultural production, and the malls....

Latin America is famous for this.

Thanks for the Reply here though. I don't know many people to talk to about this kind of economics.

Lol, Chilean economy had reverted to basket case status under Allende. iirc they had 600% inflation in 1973.

That's a lot of flags.

CIA Asset, USA interest enforcer and a Israel puppet.

Fuck this guy

Pinochet was a hero. The only thing I don't like is that he was too much democratic, waiting for the camara of diputados to say that Allende was inconstitucional and people revolting. And then steeping allay when he lost the referendum.

Not sure why retarded leftists celebrate Allende here either. His entire presidency was a disaster secured on a slim % of the vote, they got btfo in elections preceding his disposal after obliterating the Chilean economy , according to miskin archives he was literally a Soviet puppet being sent commands from Moscow, and the "military coup" was barely a coup at all, the Chilean legislature and judiciary petitioned the military to remove Allende for completely disregarding rule of law and separation of powers, and the Chilean constitution had no impeachment mechanism.

More like a cuban puppet. Not even the soviets wanted to pay for his shit.

sandiegouniontribune.com/uniontrib/20060416/news_mz1e16billin.html

Allende tried to persuade Soviet leaders of this plan by arguing the idea of his country being a “silent Vietnam” in a futile attempt to invoke anti-American sentiment. Neither his plan nor this imagery was well received in Moscow, as the Soviet Union was already hesitant to openly defy the Americans in their own hemisphere. Allende left the Soviet Union with advice to resolve conflicts with Washington, a new credit of $45 million, and agreements using previously agreed credits to increase the USSR’s technical assistance in developing Chile’s copper, chemical, and fishing industries.[9] Unfortunately for Allende, instead of increasing aid in Chile, the Soviet Union reduced economic support from $144 million in 1972 to $63 million in 1973.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chile–Russia_relations