National Averages

National Averages

Police response time: +/- 18 minutes
School shooting duration: +/- 12 minutes

Full auto assault rifle: 600-900 rounds per minute

Conclusion: We need Concealed Carry certified staff at every school.

In the 70s we had airplanes hijacking all over the place; air marshals installed, hijacks stop.

School marshals that's my answer.

Why not yours?

Other urls found in this thread:

dailycaller.com/2018/02/19/texas-sheriff-who-allows-teachers-to-carry-firearms-leaves-msnbcs-jaw-on-the-floor/
nbcnews.com/news/us-news/investigation-breaches-us-airports-allowed-weapons-through-n367851
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Because sheepdogs look a lot like wolves. Scares the sheep and makes it impossible for them to pretend the wolves don't exist.

12 minutes times 600 rounds per minute = 7,200 rounds!

What if there are multiple shooters?

>In the 70s we had airplanes hijacking all over the place; air marshals installed, hijacks stop.
umm there was one in 2001, not sure if you heard about it

I say that we arm all of the children.
A classroom full of nine year olds with Hello Kitty AR15's will make a shooter think twice.

AR 15 is not fully automatic.

Cho killed with only pistols and ut remains the largest school shooting.
I have yet to hear pistols blamed

>Scares the sheep

Are you able to process what you read?
Did you hit your head?
CC hint, the first letter is "concealed."
Sheepdogs ID is hidden.
Sheep can relax.

Seems to work, where tried:

dailycaller.com/2018/02/19/texas-sheriff-who-allows-teachers-to-carry-firearms-leaves-msnbcs-jaw-on-the-floor/

remember when various media outlets said they wouldn't sensationalize mass shootings because it might encourage others?

Ah, it's "air marshals."

Silly me, I thought it was the metal detectors and bomb-sniffing dogs.

>there was one in 2001

So if school shootings were reduced to "one" every eight years you would object?
Fucking liberals...

Fun story there, actually.

In the 60's and 70's the average person didn't understand what an airplane was or how it works. They were terrifying machines thought to kill thousands of people. This can be seen in the horror movies of the time like Airport 77

This fear was compounded by a fear and misunderstanding of guns, and led people worry that if an armed person (no matter how well trained) were allowed on an airplane, everyone would inevitably die.

As a result, the Federal Air Marshals had the strictest requirements of any government office every created to date. In order to be an air marshal you had to go through extremely strict training, tons of screenings, intense interviews, very thorough background checks, etc. It was SO hard to become an air marshal that in 2001 only 60% of planes in the air actually had a marshal on board. There just weren't enough air marshals to go around.

After September 11th, George Bush signed into law an act that lowered the requirements. There's now one or two air marshals on every plane in the sky. There hasn't been another hijacking since. Not of an American plane, anyway.

I see serious thought escapes you.
I say good day.

>got a point

Actually the metal detectors and bomb sniffing dogs have never caught a single terrorist. They're security theater. A show put on to make the public feel at ease.

After 9/11, air travel tanked by something like 90-95%. People were afraid to get on planes. In order to alleviate this fear, the government expanded the TSA to basically say "look, we're keeping you safe! Come fly!"

All of the metal detectors aren't there to protect you. They're there to make you FEEL safe.

>remember when various media outlets said they wouldn't sensationalize mass shootings because it might encourage others?

Yeah, and then they forgot.

They do make it harder to bring weapons and explosives on an airplane.

Air Marshals plus CC at airports.
Problem solved.

Don't jam a thousand kids into a single school. How bow dat?

You don't seem to understand how explosives or weapons work.

Explosions occur when something grows in volume very rapidly. This can usually happen in one of two ways.

>A chain reaction that acts in a very short amount of time and converts a dense solid to a gas
>Any reaction (not necessarily chain) that acts in any amount of time but occurs in a sealed container that can withstand a large amount of pressure, but not the maximum pressure of the concluded reaction

Neither of those depend on metal, nor any specific chemical to be involved. You can make a bomb with a water bottle and some toiler bowl cleaner. Good luck picking that up on a metal detector.

Weapons are literally "anything that can hurt someone". Again -- doesn't need to be metal. There are plenty of plastics or polymers that are stronger than metal which can be woven into clothing and pass right through airport security.

In 67 out of 70 attempts people were able to sneak weapons past the TSA:
nbcnews.com/news/us-news/investigation-breaches-us-airports-allowed-weapons-through-n367851

Try again

>wat is teh sarcasms
The best part of your mad madness is that I agree with you

The response time for shooting is much faster than in other situations. Shootings are top priority. And in places where there are schools there is always police close by.

Agreed but I think the concern with that is that armed school faculty would mean easier access to a firearm for the students. If it was more of an armed guard in the hallway it would be a different story. Either way we would have to allocate funds for them and seeing as teachers are struggling to keep pencils and paper in the classroom as it is, that might be a problem.

Anyways here's some gun porn because I have nothing better to do.

...

...

...

I can understand alot of people disagreeing with putting guns INTO out school, But op has the right idea. any way you look at it the best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun

I'm sure you have an excelled source to back this up?

The total overhaul of air security is what caused hijackings to disappear. Not just air marshalls, who are supposed to be the last line of defense. I would love to see statistics on how many hijackings have been stopped by an air marshall since 2001.

The whole guns in schools thing is a crapshoot. A single officer just becomes the first target in a shoot, and if there are more, it starts to become economically infeasible. Most counties have issues with affording a police department, and what essentially amounts to like 4-12 officers depending on the number of schools is backbreaking.

As for teachers, do you really feel that most teachers, who have their jobs because they like kids, would have the clarity of mind to shoot one even if that one had a gun?

Additional the state would have to pay for the weapons, another cost they wouldn't want to pay. If you tried to make it "volunteers only" then you'd have the teacher's union in fits.

Its not the solution, and if there was an easy one it would have already happened.

I agree the more guns American's have the better, they kill each other faster that way.