What exactly started this push to include forced diversity? I don't understand when this started, who started it or why

What exactly started this push to include forced diversity? I don't understand when this started, who started it or why.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jk1kX-Tdi1Y
twitter.com/AnonBabble

did you ever heard about some peoples called "the jews"?

Doesn't look forced to me. White women genuinely prefer black cock. Deal with it.

Remove haelthy family consisting of mather+father+haelthy kids with roots, religion and roots, educated. Craete a single mom raised males, insecure, uneducated. Reduce society to number od single units (1), woulnerable, unsupported by family, aesily manipulated and depndant on any job they can get.

yeah but white girls cant suck tbhhh

Napoleon first started the idea of unified but multiculturism nationalism, realizing that there are for more resources available for his conquests and unifying of the state when he doesn't exclude certain immigrants and religions, as long as they would officially declare themself citizens of France and invested the nation.


It took after constitutional revolutions or the removal of monarchies for other countries to adopt a similar approach. After all, if immigrants and religious minorities were willing to officially sign their investment in the nation they would be a far more valueable asset instead of turning them over to other, possibly hostile nations.


These are the origins. And that's still the motivation today. Western nations are extremly willing to allow prospectible immigrants inside their country. An example is the scientific community where there is very little if any discrimination (unless politics can see a campaign or media can fetch a story). These same immigrants would've been a good asset to their country of origin, but tend to be shunned due to sexuality, mixed heritage or political agendas that put them at odds.

Government know that if they act as hypocrites and only allow in the individuals they deem an asset, prospectable individuals won't immigrate. Badly educated immigrants might not be the best short term investment, but if it also invited higher educated immigrants and give the impression of benevolence, these prospectable immigrants might feel even more nationalistic towards their government.

The push to include diversity is just a form of propoganda telling everyone that being this inclusive and catering to everyones special minorty and diverse need is for good morals and we do it out the bottom of our heart and with great charity. It sells, it makes everyone feel good about themself, it connects everyone (yes, even when we disagree, we still both talk about the same subject).

...

not op but name seems familiar

A lot of white women do it for the attention. They like being seen as "progressive". And they find the stigma of it hot too. They believe it's being rebellious. Since its seen as such a taboo and blasphemous thing still by so many people, they want to do it even more. The forbidden fruit, if you will.


Really, you cringy white purist motherfuckers are partially to blame for this. I don't even see why you care so damn much about what some bitches you don't even know do with their life.

But there was a year that it kicked into overdrive. And someone had to give the "go" signal. Someone had to fund the media for favorable coverage. This was not an organic happening. This was funded. Someone said begin and funded it

the push is basically a campaign sponsored at a higher level due to the recognition that demographics are starting to change because per capita income is a good indicator of number of children per capita (as income increases average children per family goes down)

demographically whites are the most wealthy, thus statistically they also tend to have the least children per capita, this is leading to growing minority demographics, in order to keep the economy going and stay competitive as the greatest superpowers, social cohesion and industry is required, you need slaves to feed the cogs and if the slaves are in fighting it reduces the efficiency so you need some kum-bi-ah we are all the same bullshit to try to maximize cohesion and increase production/economic efficiency

if interbreeding is encouraged it leads to the wealth of ethic diversity which blurrs the racial differences and makes it hard to define racial differences further increasing cohesion

it got on the fast track after trumps election. the left is trying to create a wedge issue between white men and everybody else to get more democrats elected.

Ronald Regan and the plight of black men under his watch Also, the entire Civil Rights movement twenty years prior.

>who started it

youtube.com/watch?v=jk1kX-Tdi1Y

you are like a little babby. napoleon was just one in a line of puppets for the judeo-masonic secret society.

>I don't understand when this started, who started it or why
>filename
wow Sup Forums you're so stealth

t. white boi

A real black man would realize that this fight isn't just about white pussy.

Some very clever demoncrat in the 60s realize more brown people less white people = more votes for them, America is being raped in the literal ass every day since.

HAHAHAHAHA you guys are fucked, Ameri ca is not going to fall to muscle brute force but to miscegenation and all the problems brown people bring with them, what problems you may ask? google midle east, south or latin america, most noticeble in latin america were white people clearly do better than brown or mixed.

what a load of mate, are you even real?
multiculturalism have being a way of life in the middle east for centuries and guess what?? it does not fucking work they being at war for like 3 centuries

south asia*

...multiculturalism existed in ancient Rome, you fucking autist.

If you want to know who pushes any certain agenda simply look at who controls the medium through which it is published. Do some research I'm sure you can figure it out.