Why does the media continue to do this with Islam, but never with Christianity?

Why does the media continue to do this with Islam, but never with Christianity?

Brevik was never called a "radical Christian"

pic. related

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/P2FZUzEa74o
twitter.com/AnonBabble

because when christians move to a country they build infrastructure, the crime rates don't skyrocket and they don't blow themselves up

there's more of them

Because Islam opposes usury and Jewish banks. Christianity used to but got cuck'd so aren't a problem anymore.

(((ISIS))) is also just a CIA proxy army to fight against Schlomo's enemies like Iran, Syria and Russia

t. Red pill

Really makes you think...

I'm an #AllahMissile now

Yeah because Muslims can't into infrastructure right?
Pic. related, a Muslim city.

youtu.be/P2FZUzEa74o

Amen!

Spread this message far and wide. Make the Money Printers tremble in their ivory towers and stone coffins (fortresses.)

>isis kill 18800 in 2 years and destabilize an entire continent
>kkk kill 1937 in 86 years

>pic related
>this is how much western engineering and pakistani slaves oil money can buy

Im sure you have a copy of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" next to your bed to.

The top picture represents people who base their actions mostly on people's skin colour, sometimes they pick on people who are a different religion.

However the bottom picture represents a people who base their actions on a single principle: religion. You can be white, black, yellow or red but you must have their religion.

The difference is that while one group picks on people who are not white, the other picks on people who aren't the same religion; regardless of race.

Theirfor the people at the bottom are a representation of Islam whilst the people at the top are a representation of the white pride movement.

Are you a newfag?

It could accurately be said that the Ku Klux Klan represented the principles of white Anglo-Saxon Protestant Christians in America during the 1920's. All you have to do is look at membership numbers and approval ratings from that era. In fact, historians do draw that conclusion. Notice, those membership numbers, and the black and white picture you posted are from 80 years ago. So then, why is it a problem to draw the same conclusion of contemporary Islam, given high levels of support worldwide for violent, political jihad?

In fairness, Protestant supremacy was an important tenet of the Ku Klux Klan. They hated so called "Papist" influence in the states, and frequently targeted Catholic populations, including groups like the Italians in Louisiana. That is to say nothing for their hatred of the Jews. However, you are correct in that their principle objective was white supremacy and racial purity in The United States. In short, OP is a faggot.

I think it has something to do with percentages, and the fact that muslim don't criticize there action. Your correlation is meaningless.

KKK just wanted to control a dangerous segment of society. It's just the way they did it most people disagree with. Muslims are just fuckin' nuts.

Remember when bait used to be good or at least have effort put into it, Sup Forums?

...

Pure coincidence goyim

because Christians don't commit nearly as many terrorist attacks, and they don't walk around screaming "God is great!" while they do it

Because the KKK is not relevant in the current year.

Built by western engineers in a country where women can't drive and they cut your head off for being gay. They're still scum, just rich scum.

Because theres only 7000 of them