Why doesn't soccer allow for rolling subs?

why doesn't soccer allow for rolling subs?

it would:

>make the game more faster. Cutting the Time On Grass for players by roughly 50% would allow for more sprints and harder pressing
>make the game more tactical. Let's say you have 22 players in the squad, so that's two lines of 11 players. Line matching would be a thing (a team could match a defensive line against the opponent's strongest line)
>a team with an injured player is no longer forced to play with 10 men, if they have made all three substitutions
>more players would be involved; more young talent would get game time, less player would complain about the lack of games

Because then the game would be interesting.

Because there is no way a change like that will get approved by FIFA. It's as simple as that. Everything from the offside rule, to the rugby and gridiron spinoffs happened because the sport was much less formal back then and there wasn't a fascist organization in charge killing everything that wasn't approved by them.

because football is not a game for fickle faggots unsure of their tactics

>Implying multiple looks and team health isn't a superior tactic

First thing that happens, whenever the ball is in their own half the defensive subs will come in.
Next thing, whenever the ball is in the opposite side, the forward subs will come in.

Then, since that will be a chaotic mess of substitutions, they will ask for timeouts to sub in the players.

Then, whenever the ball changes sides the coaches will always call a timeout. What's next? Fast forward a few years and we'll all be playing hand egg with our feet. Is that really the game you want to see?

Backcourt violation would save soccer

Because then it would be as slow as ameriburger sports and a match would last like 3 hours

>Then, since that will be a chaotic mess of substitutions, they will ask for timeouts to sub in the players.
why, even braindead canadians manage this in their higher paced sport

*Backfield

It looked like the guy was nude and had his legs spread in the thumbnail.

looks like he's fingering himself in the thumbnail

Dirty minds

No it fucking wouldn't. You're still limited my roster size, number of timeouts, and transition speed meaning having a squads of all offense and all defense would be impossible and bad tactics.

>First thing that happens, whenever the ball is in their own half the defensive subs will come in.
>Next thing, whenever the ball is in the opposite side, the forward subs will come in.

The field is big (takes a relatively long time to leave the field) and making substitutions can be risky

>Then, since that will be a chaotic mess of substitutions, they will ask for timeouts to sub in the players.

Only one time out per team allowed, then.

Subs could be allowed when the ball is out of play, but they players need to be ready in 15 seconds, or else the opposite team get the possesion (if they already have possesion, they could gain 10 metres, or something)

Canadians play in kid sized pitches tho

right, which makes it more cramped and chaotic. The larger field size and slower pace of soccer would avoid the chaos you think would happen.

>First thing that happens, whenever the ball is in their own half the defensive subs will come in.
>Next thing, whenever the ball is in the opposite side, the forward subs will come in.

Why would you risk moving your defenders off the pitch when the opponents have the ball? Subs would take place the exact opposite of what you imagined.

Yeah this. The number one time for subs would be on corner kicks and throw ins.

In a mini-pitch you can come and go in less than 5 seconds tho, taking away players from their position in footy in real time, either offensive or defensive playera in either offensive or defensive play is just counterproductive or part of retard ass tactic.
If people wants more goals why don't they just advocate to the regular retarded american ideas instead of claiming that they want to improve the sport.

Fucking hell, this thread. Fair play to the based Argie

>more subs would be better
No, because then teams with unlimited budgets would blow away everyone else. When it's Man City vs WBA and each team can only, max, use 14 players, it's a damn sight fairer than 22 each. Because the subs Man City could afford would be better than West Brown's starters. This makes the game even more skewed towards money, and drives it even further away from any notion of a level playing field. Not that it's level now, but with more subs the gap would widen even further.

>rolling subs would be better
No, because then there would be a startling lack of fluidity in the game. The reason football is so good, so global, is because it's fun and easy to play, and also easy to watch. Complicate either one of those things and you're in trouble. And with rolling subs, you complicate both; you'd move towards offense vs defence, which reduces tactics to a constant set piece-esque scenario, which nobody wants to see. And in terms of the fans, they don't want to see an ever-so-slightly-shifting war of attrition, they want to see fluid, exciting games.

Because here's the kicker - flaws aren't bad. Americans dont understand this, because of countless reasons ('Superman ethos', bigger is better, immediate gratification, etc) but flaws make football what it is. If an attacking player can't defend as well as a defender, that doesn't mean you take him off when you can, and put him back on to attack. It means the TEAM must work together, cover for each other, and must compensate, and sacrifice. Fans want to see David Silva, a diminutive and silky playmaker, doing his best to play at being a rugged defender when he needs to be - because it's so much more gratifying. Not only to see a player work at every aspect of the game, and we can for an instant out ourselves in the same "jumpers for goalposts" shoes, but then when Silva gets on the ball...

Ah, fuck it. If you don't get it now, you never will.

watch handball then
the true patrician sport

this

/thread
/discussion

Why does this look like a tranny fingering its vagina

>Fast forward a few years and we'll all be playing hand egg with our feet. Is that really the game you want to see?

>asking this to fucking burgers
Of course they do, they watch Hand Egg. They're that stupid.

>soccer

Go home Ahmed

this

I saw the same thing. I was like, damn, that dude must have a tiny dick.