Really makes you think, doesn't it?

Really makes you think, doesn't it?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Well, Liberalism and Fascism go hand in hand, so sure!

Liberals project.

Wow, they can't even come up with their own strawmen. They just steal ours.

>Liberal: fascists should have free speech

You're kidding, right?

Really makes me think that the liberals attacking Trumpers must be plants, amirite? False flag, false flag! We all know liberals champion open speech!

>what is complete cognitive dissonance and lack of self-awareness

>Liberal
>X should have free speech

Liberal: the only people who should have free speech are those who agree with me

Fascist: the only people who should have free speech are those who should tell the truth

FTFY

>""""liberals""""

They're not liberals, they're communist progressive traitor cucks who need to be exterminated from the gene pool.

KEK
U
C
K

>get into power
>American education

>Liberal: Hate Speech is not Free Speech
>Fascist: I agree, now into the gulag for having an poor opinion of our leader

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism
I know the word has been hijacked by lunatics in the US, but come on.

this

They're the biggest pushers for "hate speech" laws. Muslims get a free pass though even though they're already killing people who offend them :^)

Liberals deserve to die

It's not cognitive dissonance.
Cognitive dissonance would mean they're aware of the contradiction in their thought and it's causing them some internal conflict.
Social justice is pure doublethink.

>Arguing from the dictionary
>"Feminism means equality so I'm supporting equality no matter what I say or do #KillAllMen"
Don't be retarded.

>implying
>speech = automatic control

Well atleast here in Germany the word liberal still has the same meaning as the one in the dictionary. We also have a liberal party that fights for individual rights and opposes any kind of censorship.
Iam very sad that such a wonderful concept has been tainted by lunatics in the US and elsewhere.

As a relatively progressive liberal type person... Donald Trump has to win because if he doesn't the regressives that are backing Shillery will pretty much normalize the control of speech.

After that happens neither liberals nor conservatives will have any words left to express their political desires.

I mean, that's why we call everybody cucks. It's the last word that hasn't been banned to describe a weak person that puts the interests of those who count on them on the backburner while they flap off to their fetish of breeding the people they are supposed to care about with a big meat-tube full of incompatible ideologies. Or at least enables this through inaction.

I know plenty of other left wingers that have just been shaking their head at all this SJW Regressive nonsense too. But "cuck" is the only word we have left.

If Trump doesn't win, and shitscare the regressive cucks, then we might not even have the word cuck come 20cuck17.

We'll just be spectators, but not participants, to some bullshit dystopian future.

Trump himself might be full of shit. But this isn't what this is about anymore. It hasn't been for a while.

You know, hitler welcomed opposition and criticism. He knew that fascism would triumph as an ideology in Germany's public sphere.

What he didn't welcome was defeatism because he saw it as an integral part of Germany's loss in the first world war.

You ever notice girls with nice asses always have flat tits.

Socialist/communists hate liberalism

Not the stupid American meaning of liberalism, but classical liberalism. Can't be having any personal freedom in the glorious workers' republic you see.

>muh speshul classical brand of liberalism has never been tried
except it has and it got us american and france, good show

My father basically makes the same argument. Then again he was discriminated against most of his life, and jokes at the expenses of his origins were made constantly around him, so this must have influenced the way he thinks. The same doesn't apply to these cucks.

His argument was that speech is all that's needed to gain power, such as was the case with Hitler, so the only way to prevent bad elements to rise is to prevent free speech for these elements. It's a kind of slippery slope argument. My counterargument was that the reverse is also true: you can push this banning of speech of undesirables so far that nobody except your cronies are allowed any free speech, and you're back into fascism. He thinks it's not likely to ever get literally that bad, whereas Hitler is a real-life example of the opposite.

>Fascist truth is objective

>Sup Forums 2016

Pfft the left has killed more people than any fascists.

Funny, because that's the mentality paranoid fascists have.

Really makes me dream, doesn't it?

i love this gif

There was literally nothing wrong with the 1st through 4th French republics.

>paranoid

What the fuck are you talking about? Iam talking about liberalism and not anarchy or whatever those "we don't even need a government"-fucks believe in.
In every democracy you have a degree of liberalism and it is up for the people to decide how much. Fighting against freedom of speech is not liberal.

Maybe he's going by the real definition of liberal, not the american definition

Obligatory

>Kosher

yeah, and liberalism gets you shitcountries like america and france who eventually invite millions of shitskins to live in white countries. you start down that path and you never come back

>Geheim!

kek

>america and france
>invite millions of shitskins to live in white countries
That's a weird way to spell Germany.

Kek be praised.

It's the other way around.

France has had muzzies since the 60s man, and we're only 60% white and dropping. Germany is more fucked, but we're still fucked in the long run.

>MUH CLASSICAL LIBERALS

Currently the liberal party is not in control and they are one of the parties that advocate for the old system where refugees had to stay in the safe country they arrive in.
Currently the "conservative" (not real conservative there for "") with Angela Merkel and the "social" party are responsible.

If you're a fascist, your goal isn't to avoid hypocrisy or to play by the established rules. Your goal is to serve the nation through your ideology and do whatever is necessary to be able to implement it. If taking advantage of freeze peach that they themselves wouldn't provide is necessary than so be it. If the people want fascism, it will be established by the ballot or the gun regardless of whether or not fascists are given a platform.

Furthermore, radical leftism is essentially the same.

>Christian democratic centrist government: communists should be allowed to have a party and be elected
>communist: thank you. as soon as i get into power i am going to kill you. capitalist swine

>France has had muzzies since the 60s man
Sure, but Germany is the driving force behind the EU, which is the body that opened the floodgates in Europe.

>we're only 60% white
And 0.5% Muslim

If you aren't strictly illiberal you're de facto surrendering to cultural subversion

but you're probably some gay nigger anyway so whatever

Oh no doubt I'd rather spics and niggers than Muslims, since we won't become a caliphate, but it's still a slow demographic downfall.

Replace fascist with muslim desu.

Eh, i wish i saved the picture where girl was saying that if you want to vote trump you shouldn't be allowed to vote...

I wouldn't save a picture of Hillary Clinton either.

Is your father Jewish?

The people calling them cucks aren't really fascists. The left is so anti-civilization anyone advocating for any coherent idea of standards or self interest is hitler 2.0

>I get to decide who is fascist and who isn't according to how do they agree with my pollitical viewpoint

>Liberal: fascists should have free speech and a platform

Yeah okay. We all know liberals are always fighting for free speech and are totally sane and non-violent.

>Well atleast here in Germany the word liberal still has the same meaning as the one in the dictionary
in germany, "turk" means german so forgive my skepticism

I see he got "Liberal" and "Fascist" around the wrong way.

Really makes you think, doesn't it?

That's why he had to make false flags attacks, beat up and terrorize opposition and rig elections to come to power.

>faschists should have free speech and a platform
Then why do they constantly attempt to tear down legal platforms for dissenting opinions?

The only reason liberals say things like this is because it is exactly what they would do if they were in power.

Murrica isn't the entire world. Europe is using the word liberal with its proper sense.

Here you go mate, fixed it for you

>Murrica isn't the entire world
couldve fooled me with how obsessed you eurotards are with our elections. every time i ask about it everyone says "durr it affects us too dummy"

He didn't do any of that to get into power....

They attacked communists because of the 1918 revolution attempt in Bavaria (as did many other groups).

They used a false flag to attack Poland once they were in power.

They did not rig elections until after they were in power.

>soviet education

Point to a single mainstream european party that uses the word "liberal" as in "Classical Liberalism" and not "FUCK ME IN MY ASS" modern liberalism.

>fascist should have free speech and a platform
said no liberal ever

...

There are no liberals who believe in free speech, and their religion is to put words in the mouths of fascists, and their politics is to declare everyone to be fascist.

Kill yourself faggot

t. PSD

I don't know fucking shit about Romania, but it looks like you are correct.

Not exactly sure what you're implying, but that is a standard phrase in the English language

...

The poles killing ethnic Germans in former German territory was a false flag?

Interesting.

I was talking of the "border incident" that led to the invasion, but please, if you have info on other events as you described, please present it.

>Liberals deserve to die
Don't give those sweet southern belles MAGA hats to wear in a degenerate state.

>degenerate

>communists
>not political opposition
>reichstag burning
>not a false flag to get unlimited power

>>communists
>>not political opposition
They were not attacked for being opposition, otherwise the social democrats would also have been attacked.

The Communists were attacked because:
a) they caused a communist rebellion in Bavaria in 1918 and tried to seize control of the rest of the country as well
b) the Communist party was a Soviet puppet


>>reichstag burning
>>not a false flag to get unlimited power
It wasn't, it literally was an accident that was spun as the work of jews and communists.

Rather a different thing from a false flag.

A false flag is when you hurt your own side to do such things. The Nazis were being opportunistic.


>soviet education

>not wearing the stars and bars

dropped

10/10

>social democrats would also have been attacked
They were.
>It wasn't, it literally was an accident that was spun as the work of jews and communists.
No, it was planned and assisted by nazis.

>emu education
>nazi propaganda

lol he thinks liberals want free speech

>Wearing the colors of an enemy country

Fuck off.