Could they have won WW2 if they had teamed up till the end?

Could they have won WW2 if they had teamed up till the end?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Adolf_Hitler#.22We_are_Socialists.22
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Sorge
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Would they have won if two completely opposing Worldviews united somehow

I'm not sure I understand.

i think they both won desu

The only reason the Red Army was as good as it was from 43 onwards was because they learned from the Germans. If they had not had that trial by fire, they probably would be shitting around the battlefield doing dumbass zerg rushes as opposed to the mobile flanking, deep operation stuff Zhukov had them do. THey also would not have developed the tanks they did, nor in the numbers they did. Lack of lend-lease (>inb4 it was insignificant numbers) would have been detrimental too.

Hitler would have used Stalin as cannon-fodder and STalin would try it on Hitler. THey'd just muck about and ruin each other. Both were shit-tier military commanders who only did as well as they did when the actual military was given command.

But sure, they'd slap eastern europe to bits and maybe take the middle-east/Egypt without too much trouble.

>completely opposing
not at all

Communism and Fascism are completely opposing eachother

Communism was a jew thing and Hitler despised it
mind you that his party was called "National Socialism" because he hijacked it from actual socialists

The problem is that they would never operate large numbers

>mind you that his party was called "National Socialism"

Imagine going to a party w/ Hitler and Stalin

>Fascism
>Nazi Germany

>It's an episode of "national socialism is not fascism"

I don't like this episode anymore.

Mm yes, the unconventional anti-communism of allying with the communists, quite.

he also allied with the muslims and had blacks in his Army (from the german african colonies)
what does it mean, especially for Sup Forumsltards? that Hitler was a hypocryte or a misunderstood hero for socialism?

I honestly think it was just all opportunism, although I'll never understand why they tied themselves into a useless alliance with Japan.

easy

It wasn't useless. If Germany would have to fight USSR, Japan would be drawing some of the soviet forces to the east. As well as if the war would be against England - germans pushing in the Europe and Africa, japanese are taking over Asian colonies.
The thing is that they got each other fucked - Germany didn't helped Japan during the conflicts in Mongolia and on the soviet borders, Japan decided to fight America instead of invading USSR.

Keep your friends close and you enemies closer.

Stalin would have never let fascism win
they just got a NAP because Stalin didn't want to be attacked while they were preparing for war and Hitler wanted less fronts

wrong

>completely opposing
HAHAHAHAHAHA
Hitler and Stalin had literally the same ideology, yes even Stalin practiced a communism respecting russian culture, nationalism and traditions.
this is pretty much what Hitler did too.
also Stalin removed the jews of power.

en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Adolf_Hitler#.22We_are_Socialists.22

nazis were more anti-communists than anti-semites
that should tell you everything

Communism and Fascism are brothers.
They look a different direction, but they do same thing.

The NSDAP threw socialist ideas around to gain support from the working class. They weren't very Socialist in reality

because Hitler hijacked the party
all he cared about was the Nationalist part of the ideology

good post actually

>mfw that pic

that diagram is absolutely retarded

btw the funniest part is that anarchism and communism are basically the same with the same goal society with the difference on how to reach there

Also, the russians would have joined the japanese in their offensive against the US.

Are you sure? Because having semi-private enterprises it's pretty socialist, like the Volkswagen.

I see what you're doing there, anarchist :^l

What is the horseshoe effect for $500 Alex

that's general patton tho

>Could they have won WW2 if they had teamed up till the end?

Sure, but it was just impossible. For Hitler, Bolsheviks and Jews were the same and he wanted all Eastern europe for Germany.

Now, if UK and Germany had teamed up against USSR, that would have been interesting.

Japan was the best partner conceivable to keep Russia in check from the other side. Besides an actual two fronts war being devastating to Russia, even Japan's mere presence as an ally worked in favor of Germany, as Russia had to spare a considerable portion of army for Far Eastern defense to prepare for a potential Japanese invasion. This is evident from the fact that the diverted Siberian and Far Eastern forces (which were quite experienced with extremely cold environments) saved the day for Russia later, after a famous soviet spy, Richard Sorge, got Japan's actual intention of southwards expansion:
>In mid-September 1941, he informed the Soviet command that Japan was not going to attack the Soviet Union in the near future, which allowed the command to transfer 18 divisions, 1,700 tanks, and over 1,500 aircraft from Siberia and the Far East to the Western Front against Nazi Germany during the most critical months of the Battle for Moscow; one of the turning points of World War II.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Sorge
Without his critical intelligence, Russia would have lost Moscow and arguably the war itself.

Also, an alliance between a seapower with a great navy and a landpower with a great army was considered to be complementary and to form an invincible power, which was actually the case until the combination of USSR and USA began to strike back in a larger scale.

>horseshoe theory

wewlad