Earth is flat, prove me wrong, globe-cucks

earth is flat, prove me wrong, globe-cucks

Attached: noseBoi.jpg (480x600, 24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=iigUBjf4-pc
lottopays.com/jackpot-city-casino
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

/thread

boi prove it

There was a bump in the road today.

Here. If still not convinced get a shuttle or become an astronaut and get into space to have a look with your own eyes

Attached: CZcfzTXVAAAdCaJ.jpg (1200x799, 137K)

Then how do hills exist u retard lol ...

Hey asshole, the Flat Earth Movement has supporters all around the globe ...

Just to add: This one was shot from the moon

Attached: 300px-NASA-Apollo8-Dec24-Earthrise.jpg (300x300, 8K)

You mad white boi?

Then get a shuttle or become an astronaut and get into space to have a look with your own eyes and tell the flat Earth supporters afterwards to do the same

Attached: this-spectacular-image-is-the-most-detailed-true-color-image-of-the-entire-earth-scientists-stitched (1200x750, 122K)

Biggest dumbass on Sup Forums.

check mate

The Earth is hexagon shaped.

You can't prove it isn't.

Therefore, it is.

Attached: 1519847000270.jpg (750x1000, 158K)

Then why's it harder to create an accurate flat map than a globe map? Why do flattards not have a proper map of the earth? Why don't flattards know anything about what's at the edge of the earth or how the sun and moon work, or the seasons? Why do flattards have different ideas of how everything works?

Your wrong, it’s a flat octagon

Here as a real world test that will prove the truth. Anyone who has access to the beach can do it.
1 go to beach
2 lay on stomach facing water
3 wait for sun to set
4 at the last second of the sunset stand up as fast as possible
If you can see the sun again you proved it was behind the curvature of earth. If you cannot see it you proved it passed the vanishing point and earth is flat.

>earth is flat
I live on a hill, your argument is invalid.

Prove something that everyone has known since the 1500s and you are to stupid to read? Nah, if your to dumb by now there is no saving you.

That's a cgi composite image. Try again user

Why am I unable to see France from where I am? If the Earth is flat, then we should be able to see everything from the north pole to the south pole and everything in between without moving.

Lunar libration

Not true user. Even on a infinite flat plane a 6ft tall person could only see about 6 miles before the horizon met his eye line. Coincidentally, it's almost exactly the same distance that a 6 ft tall person can see on our 'Globe' Earth.

If the earth was flat, there would be no horizon, dip shit.

Explain.

Our eyesight is not limited to six miles, how is it limited on a flat plane?

1 go to beach
2 lay on stomach facing water
3 wait for sun to set
4 at the last possible second stay like that and don't move an inch until the tide has swept you away into the sunset

Attached: 1470221178076.gif (480x262, 489K)

careful, you're gonna lure out the moon landing conspiracy fags

>beating their logic with logic even dumber
genius.

>be user sitting at one end of corridor
>look down to the other end of said corridor
>Notice how the other end seems to be elevated, despite user knowing the floor is flat and level.
>HolyHorizon.jpeg
>relaise that if the corridor was long enough (approx 3 miles from sitting position) you wouldn't be able to see the floor

They never got past 4th grade.

The higher up you go, the further you can see. If eyesight was the only factor involved there wouldn't be a difference whether you were led on the floor or 5k on top of a mountain

You cannot see infinately and everthing you can see end in a vanishing point. Obviously earth isn't flat but you cant argue if your legit dumber than them.

What are you trying to say? Certainly you dont believe elevating your body increases eyesight

Crescent moon, the shadow of the earth on the moon. The only thing that makes a curved shadow is a curved object.

What are you trying to say? Certainly you don't think you can see as far at sea level as you could stood on top of Mt Everest?

The vanishing point is at infinity, or at the resolution of your eyesight.

I think you mean partial lunar eclipse

The edge of a flat disc would also create that shadow, user.

>prove me wrong

Don't have to. You're making an assertion with no evidence to support it, therefore I can dismiss said assertion outright with no evidence.

You have yourself a nice day, friend.

Light in a vacuum will travel in a straight line indefinitely, hence why you can see stars millions of lightyears away, light in an atmosphere has air particles causing it to slow down, or diffract, which is distant landmarks look faint. Even on a flat earth you wouldn't be able to see from one side to the other.

Also, throw a ball, if it falls to the ground then the earth is round, gravity wouldn't work on a disc

An Earth accelerating upward at ~9.8 m/s/s would cause the ball to return to the floor.

I can see the sun from sea level and from mt everst, sea level is further from sun then mt everest. So i can see further from sea level

Earth is flat. Ok?

/thread

Attached: 1518516812973.jpg (294x313, 8K)

Agreed its the point were things "vanish" from eyesight. Hence the name

Boys this dude is a troll man. Poe's law /bros

You dumb fucks.

kek

No u

At sunrise and sunset the distance would be the same. Why are your eyes so fickle, user?

But at high noon my statement is valid

Obvious troll is obvious. I believe that at least 90% of "flat earthers" are trolls joking around. Bad bait

No it wouldn't. If you're riding on a bus and you jump, would you land in the same place or fly through the back window?

Going by your statement that the earth is accelerating upwards at 9.81 ms^2, so would the person standing on it, and so would the ball that they're holding, therefor if they threw it horizontally, there would be no vertical forces acting on it except for gravity, which again, wouldn't be able to exist on a disc because it pulls towards the centre of mass, meaning that the edges of this disc would be forced towards the centre, creating a sphere

For sure. My broken clock is valid at 2.37pm everyday, too

Provided the disc is at the perfect angle to cast that shadow and not one like this.
Also why is the moon a sphere if the earth is flat?
Honestly I think flat earth is a govt plugged 'conspiracy' to try make theorists less credible.

Attached: 83D5332D-337D-4251-8A3A-CFA99D831C82.jpg (640x1136, 44K)

It would also mean that we were traveling at several billion times the speed of light. So yeah.

Upward from where? Does the entire solar system accelerate upward? What prevents inertial impartion on thrown objects? E.g. if I throw a ball straight up, it would accelerate at the thrown speed PLUS the initial rate of acceleration. What causes the ball to fall again, if the acceleration elsewhere is constant?

We live on one of these things, gravity isn't real and gases in the atmosphere + optics keep the sky opaque during the day. Stars are much closer than you think and they are where the Overlords live.

Attached: IMG_7182.jpg (994x634, 137K)

user, this is a common mistake. Superimposing the rules of the Round Earth model (ie gravity) onto a Flat Earth will absolutely cause a logical breakdown. As will applying FE laws to a RE. For critical thought you must assess the contradictions which are inherent to FE. Saying FE isn't compatible with the theory of gravity, when FEers deny gravity exists and don't incluse it in their model, is a pretty poor argument.

The entire solar system is moving through space; the earth orbits the sun, the sun orbits the centre of the galaxy, and the galaxy is moving away from the centre of the universe, there's no acceleration, just constant speed, according to classical physics at least

It seems like you are confusing acceleration and velocity

What about 2:37am?

kek well played, user

Hey asshole. They are all FUCKING STUPID!!!!

time cube up in this bitch

Flat Earthers are unevolved retards...fact

You are truly a man of insight

still waiting on those edge pictures they promised.

How can the earth be flat if the earth is a sphere? Fucking retards.

Horizon on flat plain is always at eye level. The other end of the corridor isn't "elevated", have ever even been in a corridor? Also why are you sitting down, and why are you looking DOWN to the other side of the corridor. It's like you're trying to create some kind of optical illusion in peoples heads, but failing miserably .

Anything with mass has gravity, the greater the mass, the stronger the force of gravity. This is a concept that's existed for hundreds of years, and the idea of a round earth for thousands. A disc cannot naturally form in space, matter is drawn to the centre of mass equally from all sides until a ball is created

Attached: 1508601884385.jpg (237x250, 12K)

Its almost as if you didn't even read his post...

the density of the atmosphere would prevent it ofc, user. Air resistance would slow the ball until it had no kenetic energy at which point the ground would catch up to it. Please try harder

I believe the earth is a sphere but this photos low resolution would probs make flat earthers bust a nut about how it looks fake lol

To say gravity doesn't exist is stupid, what causes things to fall?

at 2.37pm my broken clock tells the correct time, user. Just like your argument is true everyday at high noon. Sadly, both are useless the rest of the day

Attached: RoundEarth.jpg (700x524, 48K)

The nOrb theory is our reality. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!
youtube.com/watch?v=iigUBjf4-pc

Attached: norb theory.jpg (336x188, 22K)

Burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

Fuck of trolltard.

Oh dear.

Just start researching vaccums & Torr levels and tell me if its wven possible to go into space if it exists

user pls pay attention, words and context matter: "...seems to be elevated". Also, stop Jewing the debate with semantics and prove the Earth is round with evidence.

hubris, mostly

If my argument is true sometimes, then is your argument wrong sometimes? If your argument is wrong sometimes does that mean it is not valid either?

Republicans need to start aborting their tard fetuses. They are dumbing the human gene pool

Attached: image.jpg (400x400, 41K)

Those damn jews again huh.

user, I've already mentioned that the FE model breaks down as soon as you impose gravity onto it. Just as the Globe model stops working if you take gravity away. FEers deny gravity exists, and since it's a scientific theory not law you can't prove that they are wrong to believe so

Anyone ever see the floppy door on the ISS? Ever seen what pressure does to a submarine?

That doesn't even make sense

You're a rapist, prove me wrong

Flat earthers, who do you vote for?

Attached: f94d59eccf4de576076491419bbc15f3_XL[1].jpg (1170x659, 43K)

Sure you can. That's not what "theory" means.

The phenomenon of gravity is objectively real.

ikr user?!

I'm drunk and tired and posting in this thread reminds me of the quote "never argue with an idiot, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience"
So I'm going to bed

That's why its called Newton's LAW of Gravity. right?

Einstein's laws of gravitation

Gravity isn't a theory, the universe wouldn't exist without it

Exactly user, It's a phenomenon. The effects of which can be objectively measured, but the source cause can not be proven. It's the best theory that scientists have based on the data available, that's it,

Proof right here
lottopays.com/jackpot-city-casino

physics gives me a hadron

HOLY KEK. user you're a legend for this one. This was like a beautiful symphony