World War 3

World War 3 is inevitable and might break out any moment now.
I really doubt America will let russia humiliate itself.
I hope we will finally destroy russia completely.

bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-40329036

Other urls found in this thread:

bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-19/
youtube.com/watch?v=RM0uvgHKZe8
news.vice.com/article/libyan-oil-gold-and-qaddafi-the-strange-email-sidney-blumenthal-sent-hillary-clinton-in-2011
foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/01/06/new-hillary-emails-reveal-true-motive-for-libya-intervention/
money.cnn.com/2016/02/09/investing/iran-euro-us-dollar/index.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran–Iraq_War
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_tree_of_English_and_British_monarchs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Tbh we shouldn't have engaged the Syrian jet in the first place. But all the US foreign policy eggheads can't just let Syria go because muh geopolitical dominance muh Shia crescent

>we
Look closer at your flag

Netherlands has been a US ally for centuries and is part of the Syria coalition

They should engage Russian anti-air while they're at it

>ww3 over russia or china
sorry but world wars are fought over relevant countries

US at it again with attacking a sovereign government for trying to defend its own fucking territory for Islamists backed by Saudi Arabia and the United Caliphate. I cannot fucking wait until the 20s and 30s when China has a large global military presence and starts denying US from spreading Islamic extremeism in these conflicts.

I'm hoping it'll just be a proxy war. But honestly... the Russians are there at the request of the Syrian government. The Americans are not.
You'd think it would be frowned upon to send airplanes to a sovereign country in order to shoot down their jets, no?

There will never be a war as long as the US hasn't finished building its web of nuclear defense missiles.

implying people here want to defend russia and fight for this shithole.
the only problem is that the government may force us to do that and if someone refuses he goes to gulag.
i hope america and europe will accept russian refugees

Having a think..

Sorry but whites can't be refugees

This desu. We have no business blowing up Syrian jets.

Geopolitical dominance is a good thing.

Fuck off you self hating faggot

I'll never understand how people on Sup Forums support Assad so damn much. He's nothing more than a islamic dictator. Even if you don't believe he's ever violated human rights, which is bullshit in the first place, he's still a right cunt.
Also the Rebels asked for our assistance. And your damn stupid if you think the U.S. won't help someone that is fighting someone that is backed by Russia.

Do you really think they'd go as far as reopening the gulags?

>russians
>white
if you look closer you can clearly see that we have asiatic features not to mention slavs are not white by default

>deserve to be*

you can't completely wipe out the memeland, cuckboy

>tfw Russia cucks you out of your place as main antagonist

desu the worst thing Trump has ever done is pull out our THAAD missiles from previous satellite states and Turkey. We are getting close to ending MAD and he prolonged that.

>reopening the gulags
i think something like labour camps might be opened where they will force people to make (build?) military equipment, vehicles, armors etc.

on an offtopic mode, was the second chapter of "Blue is the Warmest Color" any good?

>I'll never understand how people on Sup Forums support Assad so damn much. He's nothing more than a islamic dictator. Even if you don't believe he's ever violated human rights, which is bullshit in the first place, he's still a right cunt.
And yet your nation finds a way to prop up a more terrible alternative by propping up ISIS and harassing Kurdish fighters in the YPG.

>He's nothing more than a islamic dictator.

Nod really. First of all he's an Alawite which barely counts as Islam (most Muslims consider them heretics). Also he's far more tolerant of religious minorities than le moderate Druze and Alawite beheaders we and the Israelis give money to.

Didn't watch nor read it.

If Assad would stop sucking Russian cum straight out of Ivan's peehole he would never have had a problem

No one likes Assad not even the people in SAA, they used to protest against him before they realized what the fuck this "revolution" was about.But they support him because he won't turn their country to another Saudi Arabia or worse Afghanistan.If something like that happened here today and it was Erdoshit at the helm against Saudi-US backed proxies I would support him too desu.

ISIS doesn't even want to be Syria though. ISIS wants their own fucking country. And in the first place, the U.S. is not funding ISIS, we are funding the Kurds.

>just because someone doesn't give a shit about religion automatically makes him not a dictator
What drugs are you on?

Assad's learning the true face of k*rds. He'll let us remove them in no time.

is*

It is called "An Act of War".

Kill yourself.

I trust the Russian nuclear arsenal. They will be able to turn all of NATO into dust.

You said 'Islamic dictator' which is incorrect. Anyway, we don't have a problem with dictators in principle: just look at our present relationships with Saudi, other GCCs, Egypt, Turkey, etc. Displacing Assad is likely to result in someone much worse seizing power.

>the U.S. is not funding ISIS, we are funding the Kurds
The mouth says one thing the hand does another. Trump arms and gives money to ISIS via Saudi Arabia, while the Kurds are kept from expanding their gains by other "US aligned" groups.

You first Islamism supporting neocon dolt

>lets replace the relatively secular (for the middle east) dictator with one of several radical islamist groups
Haha sure showed those muslims

>islamic dictator
literally fake news

the reason is simple. Assad is a secular dictator.
Syria has large Christian, Alawite, Druze etc minorities. like 40% of the country is made of minorities Isis wants to kill.

The moral thing (from a human rights point of view) is to support him, and the moral thing would have been not helping the Taliban in Soviet Aghanistan back in the 80s.

Isis, or the "moderate islamists" will be worse for women and the many minorities of Syria, than Assad.

The moral thing would be to support a faction like the YPG.

This Russian-Asian mix girls turn me on. they're also the easiest to get.

The YPG don't want to govern Syria; they just want to have their little anarchist commune in peace

This desu, Syria needs more child soldiers.

they are Kurdish separatists. They dont want to rule all of Syria, and even if they succeed, there would be a bigger war since Turkey for sure would invade them.

The best thing would be for the war to be over as soon as possible, and Assad is in the best position to achieve victory.

> anarchist
communist
be honest with yourselves burgers
and yeah kurds deserve it but they'll never have it
well maybe in Iraq but not really likely

They want to serve as an example for other governments in the region and abroad. It's in their manifestos.

They're communalists, not communists: it's a post-Marxist ideology that has more to do with anarchism than Marxism-Leninism or Stalinism

yeah because the West wouldn't created it instead picking other countries
come on
you know there's no way out for those little states, because there'll always be someplace that sucks up to the West less than all the others, so you'd bomb that

yeah, just like modern Jihadis aren't the same as Mujaheddeen back in the day
completely different ;3

and what should i see there? we are not filthy cowards unlike many of you

No one will go war for shitty syria

>Russia vs Trump's America
Would be funny if EU didn't intervene.
But obviously >NATO

Why are brits and germs so traitorous?

Not an apt comparison at all. Yes, everyone acknowledges that supporting the Mujahadeen to strike a blow at the USSR was a mistake. However, the YPG are not expansionistic. They do not have a desire for international socialism.

Holy shit you're an idiot.

Look at their history. They've done nothing but fuck up at every turn.

>fighting for the jude
I'm gonna become a Russian spy desu

>he doesn't realize jews have been playing both sides since the beginning of time

bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-19/
>U.S. Moves Jets to Ease Syria Tensions Amid Russian Threat

Cuckolded

Assad jailed all of the pro-democracy elements in Syria as part of his ruse to stay in power. By eliminating that third option, he made it so that the only choices were either him or Islamofascism.

i think it's a very apt comparison
both the fact that the arabic word "mujahed" isn't used on Western TV and the fact that you'll never hear a word about YPG having communist/socialist ideology all scream about the iability of Western institutions and public to ever admit mistakes

and without admitting problems, there can be no solutions

>all pro-democracy

Yeah just like in Egypt and Libya where the "pro-democracy" forced one.

There's the problem though, the regimes which got booted in Egypt and Libya were secularist dictatorships. The thing some people don't realize is that a dictatorship doesn't bring lasting stability to a country, they all fall inevitably, as happened in those cunts, Iraq, and Iran in 1979.

Oh my english

>pro-democracy
1. The protestors were sunni islamic state first, islamic "democracy" second.
2. The protestors never got anywhere close to 20% of the population. There's a reason the rebels only have 15% of the population. All stats from 2011 say 300'000 to 500'000 protestors countrywide.
3. Jihadists were the main forces in these riots and rebellions from the start. Where else did these "democractic" protestors get the guns and bombs to conquer cities and army bases from?

Assad isn't a good person, but he is the best option.

his "ruse" to stay in power was his country's constitution
it's a shit constitution to be sure but using force against protesters is something that's done in many countries,

in this case, as in most others, people that fired the first shots will never be found but it's as likely a dictator on shaky ground that authorizes the shooting of unarmed people, as a trigger-happy 17yo idiot with allah in his head

>egypt 1972-2011
>libya 1968-2011
>iraq 1958-2003
>Gulf States 1945-present
>North Africa 1945-present
>Tunisia 1955-2011

Wow how instable

France had three republics crash in that time.

The "stable democracy" meme is an unsubstantiated lie.

>The "stable democracy" meme is an unsubstantiated lie.
Don't we have the oldest written constitution in the world or something?

Also most of the cunts you listened had many coups/civil wars/changes of government over the years.

Thats brown people for you. The us government has lasted for 240 some odd years now

Yeah libya was a kingdom in the 50s

>300 B.C + 2300
>jewmocracies

>1861-1865

Are you guys purposefully being retarded?

>dictatorships don't bring stability to a country
>roman empire
Those countries collapsed due to Jewmerican CIA invasions and sometimes actual jewish invasions

Government didn't collapse or change

you literally live on an island half a world away from any trouble and yet still have to spend 15 times more than your opponents combined just to keep up the show

that's impressive in a way, but the "island with a fleet" model isn't universal and won't wok most places

When is this meme going too die

Technically, constitutional monarchy is the most stable government there is. Most of the Northern European cunts have 1000 or more years of governmental continuity.

>meme
youtube.com/watch?v=RM0uvgHKZe8

Is this thread final proof that Americans are dumb as shit?

No they don't

is it so hard to understand you cant have a real democracy with people who think apostates should be executed?

For decades Indonesia was seen as the model of a moderate Islamic democracy, and they recently jailed the Christian governor of Jakarta for "blasphemy" (criticizing Islamists who said the Quran forbids muslims from voting for non muslims).

You first give them democracy, and then have to send an emergency envoy to keep them from stoning to death adulterous women, as it happened with Afghanistan.

it's just a couple covert ops away agent
topple a couple more regimes and assasinate a few more people and america will finally be safe

Saddam and ghaddifi were not good people at all. Stop trying to make them martyrs. It makes you look dumb

The monarchies in England, Sweden, etc go way the fuck back into the Middle Ages.

I don't see anything wrong with that. People who destabilize a nation should be executed. Such as whores(who statistically cause crime rates to rise) or a politician who does not represent the will of the people.

>pic related last quote

>accuses Americans of being dumb
>the country that started two wars they couldn't win and is allowing themselves to be raped by millions of Third World savages

You need to read history. Especially English history if you believe that.

>Saddam and Gaddafi were not good people
>t. Schlomo
Of course they were trying to stop International Jewish banking cartels, what horrible people

>proving my point

They definitely were not. Saddam Hussein completely ruined a once prosperous cunt and turned it into a pariah state and Qaddafi same, he used all the oil wealth to fund terrorism.

>Germany started those wars
>t. American education

nobody is making the saint dumbass, but sure you would take assad over osama to govern your country if you had to chose

Queen Elizabeth traces her lineage back to William the Conqueror. You didn't know that? No of course you don't, otherwise you wouldn't be projecting your lack of education onto others.

Ghaddifi wanted to be the king of Africa and invaded another country for a 10 mile strip of land. He then proceeded to find every terrorist group in the world.

Saddam used chemical weapons given to him by the soviets to gas people from 1980 to 2001.

>t. CIA
Saddam and Gaddafi both decided to stop selling oil for USD which threatened the value of the American petrodollar and the Western economy, not to mention Africa was gonna be independent from the West which also threatened their shekels.

news.vice.com/article/libyan-oil-gold-and-qaddafi-the-strange-email-sidney-blumenthal-sent-hillary-clinton-in-2011
foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/01/06/new-hillary-emails-reveal-true-motive-for-libya-intervention/

money.cnn.com/2016/02/09/investing/iran-euro-us-dollar/index.html

Holy fuck your dumb. The Windsor family got into power because of a civil war where the rightful king of England was driven out by parliament and the Dutch king whom they invited over to rule

The form of government is irrelevant, the real factor is having a nation of 90% primitive medieval savages. An uneducated, backwards nation is going to be inherently unstable. For stability/democracy to work, you need to fix the people. Else it doesn't matter, you can have an Assad or an ISIS in charge and the result will still be the same.

>not sure if pretending to be retarded or actually a retard
Wtf are you rambling about retard? Gaddafi was the leader of the African Union at that time, everyone in Africa loved him. What country did he invade?

Saddam was given chemical weapons when he was allied with America during the Iran-Iraq war in which America told him to attack Iran(after they revolted against the British Petroleum)
and in return he would get American support, he used them to gas the Iranians and the Kurds that were allied with Iran.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran–Iraq_War

Which was way before the Gulf War or Desert Storm. He later stopped being allies with America when America started supporting Israeli aggression.

Was gonna write my opinion, but I remembered that governments now have full control over ISPs and can see everything we write. Oh well.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_tree_of_English_and_British_monarchs

I'm correct though, the English monarchs going back 1000+ years have all been related in some degree or another.

I think you meant, if you're not a slave to Jewish banking systems your an enemy of the West and will be an enemy until you get a Jewish controlled Central Bank.

Iraq and Libya were very powerful and rich and had very high HDIs but were attacked because they refused to be slaves to the jeWestern banks

>Americans ITT

All royal families are related, even the Ottomans are related to the Romans. Doesn't make them one family.