Do you believe in the Big Bang theory?

Do you believe in the Big Bang theory?

Attached: D93A5157-9A66-4968-8EAD-072D8CB381A0.jpg (800x520, 108K)

Other urls found in this thread:

thetechreader.com/top-ten/top-ten-scientific-flaws-in-the-big-bang-theory/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I'm agnostic bout it

no I don't believe Sheldon is a real person,

It's irrelevant what anyone believes... It's evidently true

No. We don’t exist because this is a computer simulation.

Turn on an fm/am radio. That static you hear is radiation from the big bang

Germanfag

IDK how but the rate of expansion can be calculated in reveres showing the age of the universe, and that it originated from one point.

so yes

These are not mutually exclusive.

Im going to fuck your mom. Thats my big bang theory!

Sup Forums might not be the best place to get a good answer. A lot of the replies will come from anons who still believe the earth is flat.

Like 1% of it.

Do you believe in tenessine?

yes. but it is just a belief. ive had beliefs before, and been wrong.

Not entirely, but it's the best we can do now with what we know. I believe the day is coming when our 20th/21st century theories will be looked at as being slightly better than the theory of the earth as the center of the universe.

It's the most likely answer we have so far, so until we disprove it and find the REAL answer-implying there is one- then I will believe it to be true; or at least highly likely.

Attached: CarinaNebula.jpg (2880x1800, 1.78M)

It's the best thing we've got so far from some of the smartest people on the planet. Believing anything else is on just a logical level incorrect.

Attached: 4.png (1024x1024, 74K)

Was flat.
The upgraded processor can simulate a sphere Earth now.

Despite your trips that is super simplified to the point of wrongness. But I mean, whatever.

Your mom's tits are flat but I still banged her bigly

No, I don't, but I don't want to elaborate until I publish my reasons for thinking so.

So close with those 9s bro.
Also, if it’s true, why is it still classified as a theory, and not a law?

Any belief that doesn't conform to what that smart people said to believe is logically incorrect?

That's a pretty bold statement.

Because it's a system of interpreting the cosmos as we observe it, not a predictive physical formula?

lol you referensing ken bone?

referencing

Seems more like a hologram

Why is neutron exchange a theory?

No, because poster was a smart people, and therefore logically correct

sabadabunga

Attached: what is the shit he says.jpg (194x259, 5K)

A theory is a story which attempts to explain the nature or existence of something

a law is an expression which describes or defines the nature or existence of something

Yeah it makes a lot of sense that everything exploded from nothing

Just like how I just made you a new sibling out of nothing by exploding into your mom.

Because neutron unilateral conquest is no longer politically savvy.

I believe nothing existed before me and nothing will after, anything else is cuck fantasy.

Yes I do. Source: BS in physics

Yes I think the big bang happened.

There is really good studies about it and also proofs. The universe is expanding so that mean it started from somewhere. We can see his expansion by using the redshift and it's 100% accurate.

My question is what was before the big bang, I wish I'll live long enough to see scientists announcing they find out what is really the universe.

Attached: 27751723_958352987655048_8527305902179649647_n.jpg (960x960, 97K)

No.

Yeah? Well your dad sucked me off last night. Source: Masters if physics

(Seriously, though, it's a bachelors, man, everyone has one. It no longer has any cred.)

I do, for the most part. But it really doesn't matter to me whether it actually happened or not. Anything that happened billions of years ago is so far removed from the current time that it is almost not worth thinking about besides a curious "huh, I wonder what that was like?"

If scientists came out tomorrow and said "we have a new theory, and now we don't think that the big bang happened at all" it won't change much of anything.

I...I think this is a joke?

yeah, that's why I didn't try to pass it off as something higher by just saying "degree". At least it's related

If scientists came out tomorrow they would still be straighter than your dad, bitch! Because he let me fuck his asshole last night!

Stupid fucking show. So hell no.

Attached: nooooooooo.jpg (768x768, 53K)

and whats your theory? a giant man was just sitting around forever and one day decided to create a universe with lots of trillions upon trillions of swirly sparklies and on one of those sparklies decide to make something where he can put lots of tiny little versions of himself on and watch them fight with each other using his giant microscope?

Holy shit, I would totally read a peer reviewed journal of swirly sparklies.

But for reals man, why the fuck would you start using that terminology when talking about religion? Do you think that Jeebas people don't know what a galaxy is? You sound kind of ignorant.

We ain’t making it that long, buddy.

That and multiverse theory

Attached: 1_3XfLd0bN-c6_RqsAQwKubg.jpg (1920x1080, 798K)

The evidence for it seems compelling. So yes, its the best theory we currently have.

The big bang theory defies all the laws of science though

I hope this isnt serious

Your mom made it long and hard last night. And by "it" I mean my dick.

Fuck outta here you can't even read you fucking child.

Little known fact, whether you subscribe to the multiverse theory or the Copenhagen interpretation, in all possible scenarios with our current physical laws I end up fucking your mom.

Elaborate?

"Believe"
"Theory"

wut

Hypothesis -> Theory -> Axiom
It's already a theory.
Note that theory got a pejorative form since creationist fags

These and many other disjointed words were among the noises made by your dad while I ravaged his ass last week.

But honestly, are you a fucking moron? Are people not allowed to believe in theories? Is that not what theories are for? Holy shit, do you only believe in abstract mathematical concepts that can be proven unequivocally? What a piece of shit simpleton.

........can you not believe in a theory? I have no idea where you're going with that.

It absolutely doesn't but I'll bite, explain.

has matter always existed or did it come into existence? How is there something from nothing? Nothing is infinity dense.
I think its happened but not how we think it happened. Everything we know comes from a 1% sample of this universe.

yes

>redshift
>blueshift
>Cosmic background radiation
there are too many things pointing out that a "big bang" event, or something similar, happened at some point in time X amount of years ago.

Attached: Morrigan-380x240.jpg (380x240, 35K)

this is where quantum mechanics come in.

Which explains why we have such great predictive models for your mom, since I sampled here so liberally.

There's too much evidence to doubt the big bang theory. Everything we see says it happened. Also, rapid expansion isn't an 'explosion from nothing.' People cant seem to grasp the fact that empty space isn't nothing. Why should everything that exists only be apparent to human senses and what our technology can detect? There is fuck loads of stuff happening at universal and subatomic levels beyond anything ourselves or technology will ever be able to see.

If "this" is a reference to your mom's poop hole and "quantum mechanics" is a euphemism for my dick (which it is, but how did you know that?) then yes, this is where quantum mechanics comes in.

"X amount of years ago" incidentally, is also how long ago your mom was born.

As with anything, we aren't 100% sure. But the evidence that we currently have suggests that the Big Bang theory is correct

RIP

you've defeated me

Attached: 1520895079535.png (952x959, 574K)

Attached: 465338923.jpg (960x960, 45K)

Your mom can tell you all about my "rapid expansion", and I definitely exploded from something last night.

I'm 100% sure I didn't wear a rubber when I broke your dad's butthole this morning.

If you understand anything about gravity and light phyics, you know that there is probably a big bang. The Big Bang is an extremely rooted theory. Like its essentially bulletproof. There is no theory that, not only disproves the big bang, mathematically and otherwise, but poses as a robust alternative theory. The question is asinine. OP is fag.

it's only a theory, when they can prove it through repeatable experiments, AS IS the scientific standard, I will believe it, but until then it stands side by side with biblical explanations (which I personally find more persuasive and internally consistent) in terms of concrete evidence.

This literally sounds like someone that has never taken a science class in there life, just has been told of the mythical entity that is science

CERN has created miniature big bangs dozens of times already.

Nobody needs to believe in it, you can see it, its none debatable.

Attached: you-went-full-retard-never-go-full-retard-quickmeme-com-14399881.png (500x556, 169K)

and did it create new miniature universes? just how tiny were these big bangs that they didn't wipe us out? considering the magnitude of the big bang which supposedly created our universe, are these tiny 'big bangs' even comparable?

Jeebas fuck man, it loses its fun when you spoonfeed me so much material.
>sigh, fine

Well, she sure as fuck isn't light but your mom's got plenty of gravity, and according to my physics, we definitely banged.

I put my root extremely up your dad's theory!

>dick euphemeism, firearms, bulletproof, yadda yadda, too easy

Your mom posed in a robust alternative pornshoot for me.
or
My robust cock posed an altenative theory when your mom said that she only does vaginal.

I dunno about asinine, but your dad's ass-was-mine all night long!

Ugh. Try harder.

Last night your mom literally sounded like someone being introduced to the mythical entity that is my scrotum.

that's what I don't get about steady-state and creationist diehards. The speed of light is what it is, and what it has been; so if we can see 13.7 billion lightyears away then we can see 13.7 billion years ago.

Big Bang has been well-verified for decades. This is not some bullshit some dickhead in Colorado smoked out of a bowl.

I think you badly misunderstand what recreating some of the conditions present immediately after the big bang means. CERN has not "created miniature big bangs" whatever the fuck you meant by that.

Also, There is no machine on earth capable of colliding particles with the force of my junk in your fathers ass.

what did the big bang explode into? what is the "space" called it is inflating into? there MUST be something on the "outside" of the "balloon"... what is it and why can i easily hold the entire universe inside it it no matter how much the universe expands?

There is just...a LOT wrong with these statements. Go read some shit. Like, I'd settle for PopSci right now. From theories of variations in universal laws like the speed of light to the fact that we can't see the big bang because the universe was opaque following the big bang, to the size of our universe, to the fact that you apparently think being documented for decades is the same thing as truth, I hate you both right now.
I mean, I agree with your position, but you are very wrong in your reasoning, and you are the problem.

u mom does since last night

Attached: 37b50a8.jpg (1536x989, 156K)

I also believe in the Big Crunch theory

I believe that god has a dick with infinite length and he stuck it in a black hole then ejaculated. the whole universe is his jizz

How many different explanations do you want, there are plenty?
Into itself, because fuck you. Into something else, because fuck you. It was always infinite, expansion into infinity is basically just point one all over again. It's localized expansion. It's universal, but in a weird extradimensional way, whatevs, man.

Also, my cum should have inflated a condom balloon last night, but I rode your mom bareback instead!

This checks out.

Me too. That's when I donkey punch your dad right before I cum, so he clenches down on my big bang.

i know you think you're being funny or edgy or whatever but you're really just looking like a sad little cunt at this point, kiddo.

Science points to the Big Bang and science points to something beyond nature. We know that energy and matter cannot be created or destroyed. The "Quantum Fluctuations" in the picture - where did they come from?

“Astronomers now find they have painted themselves into a corner because they have proven, by their own methods, that the world began abruptly in an act of creation to which you can trace the seeds of every star, every planet, every living thing in this cosmos and on the earth. And they have found that all this happened as a product of forces they cannot hope to discover. . . . That there are what I or anyone would call supernatural forces at work is now, I think, a scientifically proven fact.”
-Dr. Robert Jastrow

What if sun is actually a black hole but we are just looking at it from the other side?

Attached: sun.jpg (660x440, 38K)

I would like to tell you all a story about the night i died, and what i experienced after death.

>in amberlampse
>cant move body
>cant move eyes
>vision turns into sepia
>blackness fades in slowly from edges of vision, until it it nothing but blackness
>intense happiness
I enjoy the feeling for what feels like ages...

>sharp pain coursing through my veins
>massive needle in chest, see a man in panic next to me.
> fire burns through my body, into my limbs, I can move again, I can see, I can hear

why couldnt they let me sleep?

stay woke

Eh, mostly bored. And these fuckers are being dumb as hell up in here.

Congratulations, you've successfully argued the only remaining argument for deism.

All your work is still ahead of you. You now need to somehow prove that the prime mover cares about you, knows your name, careswhat you eat, cares what holy days you observe, cares who you have sex with and in what positions, cares what part of your genitals you saw off or have sawn off for you, etc...

No one can do it. Even Aquinas had to give it up.

I'm not that guy, but the violations that always stuck out(in my mind) are the first law of thermodynamics and entropy(second law of thermodynamics). There's more than a few problems.

thetechreader.com/top-ten/top-ten-scientific-flaws-in-the-big-bang-theory/

I don't think I have to prove all of that because the Big Bang points to the supernatural. You get fucked by a priest or something? What's with the cynicism?

>thetechreader.com/top-ten/top-ten-scientific-flaws-in-the-big-bang-theory
>The first is that there is a good reason it is only called a “theory”.

I honestly should have stopped reading here; this person doesn't even know what the word "theory" means. Germ theory and rocket theory are both theories... but I don't see this bitch denying the existence of fucking bacteria.

Briefly skimming the list...

Due to cosmic inflation, magnetic monopoles should exist in small enough number that makes a lack of human observation unsurprising.

The universe is flat and no deviations are likely to happen.

Due to general relativity causing the expansion of the universe to occur faster than the speed of light (yes, this is possible with GR), we will not observe the BB at the end of the observable universe. There is probably more universe past the end of the observable universe because of this. What we do see at the end of the OU is the CMBR, which is evidence of the big bang.

5 is nonsensical. Gravity exists.

The observational evidence for the existence of dark matter and dark energy is undeniable and mountainous.

5 is nonsensical; in general relativity, velocity is a local notion, so velocity calculated using comoving coordinates does not have any simple relation to velocity calculated locally.

The next one is nonsensical. The 2nd law of thermodynamics has nothing to do with "order."

3 is false, as random quantum fluctuations have been proven.

A static universe runs contrary to observational evidence. Occam's razor does not claim that we should toss out evidence.

The last point is just a rehash of a previous point.