Why are "REAL jazz fans" so autistic?

Why are "REAL jazz fans" so autistic?

because of this

/thread

>any review with more than one paragraph is autistic
kys

>implying the length is what makes it autistic

What's wrong with that review?

you're right, it's him disagreeing with you that makes it autistic

>articulating your opinions is autistic

The whole review is just
>it's bad because muh theory and scales
or
>it's bad because it sounds like my precious bill evans
god it's no wonder jazz is fucking dead

so it's

literally every jazz fan on Sup Forums is like this

>it's bad
he gave it 2 1/2 stars my man...
[spoiler]It's a whole star more than it deserves[/spoiler]

see

>legitimate approaches of technicality are bad becuz of my fee fees

You sound like one of those guys who thinks they don't need theory to play guitar.

>"X is boring and soulless. Y is great!"
"Oh really? I find Y boring because of how much the player relies on the pentatonic sca..."
>"HOW FUCKING DARE YOU MENTION A THEORY TERM WHILE EXPLAINING YOUR OPINION????? YOU ARE PERSONALLY KILLING JAZZ RIGHT NOW BY NOT LIKING THIS POPULAR ARTIST THAT I LIKE!!!!"

quads confirm

says the guy constantly posting threads about this shit because jtg didn't like one fucking album

so does he still post here or what?

Not for a long time

This is awful reductionist bullshit. He uses theory to first describe what's going on musically, then criticize the record for not being very creative using the aspects of the music, and he's right, too.

>Jazzthreadguy
>Not a single relevant Coltrane release rated

Kek nigga too afraid of showing he's actually just a massive pleb. He's right about meme fukui tho, entry level jazz release.

he only rates stuff he reviews

You have no idea what music theory even is do you?