i know everyone says i'm a samsung shill but they're the only ones doing this. i posted the 1st result from the official site and the 1st result of 2 other sites; not sure of the "approved" sites and sources. this also happened some time ago. but i want to discuss it now. since no one really seems to care besides me.
i know this isn't a good thread i just wanted to tell someone.
you probably recognize me since i'm the only 1 who cares about this stuff.
longer version of a line in the above post: i know everyone says i'm a samsung shill but they're the only ones doing this. i posted the 1st result from the official site and the 1st result of 2 other sites; not sure of the "approved" sites and sources. i actually don't like how samsung only has "sas" ssd's versions of 8TB and higher 2.5 inch when they could easily make sata3 ssd's; i'm hoping that -anyone- comes out with 8TB or higher sata3 ssd's; samsung just happens to always have the highest capacity's; sort of like an unopposed monopoly on high-capacity ssd's; but that's the reality and what's available now. this also happened some time ago. but i want to discuss it now. since no one really seems to care besides me.
Noah Wright
too long; didn't read: there's a 2.5 inch sas 32TB ssd in existence; but the highest 2.5 inch sata3 ssd in existence is all 2TB; except for samsung; at 4TB; and extremely expensive.
Jayden Cox
tl;dr: there's a 2.5 inch sas 32TB ssd in existence.
James Kelly
oh.
i also wanted to point out the generally mainstream availability of disk-drive capacity's over time.
if we don't get to peta-bytes then that's pretty disappointing.
i know this isn't an absolute pattern or anything. but generally it is pretty consistent. so i was hoping it would keep happening.
tho you could say this is an apparent end-of-the-line pattern for hdd's; not ssd's.
ssd's could be seen as the following.
>2000's GB >2010's TB >2020's PB ?
so maybe that works.
it could even accelerate further. which is exciting.
again. i'm just sort of disappointed that there's an "enterprise" 32TB SAS SSD in existence but only a "mainstream" 4TB SATA3 SSD in existence. it's really stupid to have "mainstream" users to be 8x slower behind "enterprise" users. if "enterprise" was just made better then i wouldn't mind. if we were just 2x slower behind "enterprise" i wouldn't mind. otherwise. i'm just sort of disappointed.
Evan Williams
again i know my honest thoughts and talking normally is labeled "autistic" and "cringe" nowadays unless i'm micwhoring and camwhoring on pootube now ironically enough so i may repost this without my honest thoughts sometime.
yeah it's bullshit. -- also. i didn't really look into it. but. both sata3 and sas hdd's have a 12TB maximum. a lot are 10TB because they're supposed to be faster or something. so. if true. then i'm sure reaching the same capacity's with mainstream user's isn't impossible. again. samsung just has to make it so or someone else has to beat samsung and make it so. since samsung is apparently leading in everything. unopposed.
that is the issue. samsung (and every other company) see no reason to give the average person better options because they control the bottleneck, which will in turn sell more units of lesser hardware for more money than they could make with superior hardware.
I heard about this new ssd when it came out, but never really looked into it any further. I don't really know what to say about it other than that is a lot of storage. They can store a lot of data on them and that is nice.
yeah. but samsung is the only 1 with ssd's of this capacity available. thus a monopoly. thus whether or not other company's would do it remains to be seen. but the other company's can not beat samsung. apparently. in terms of capacity. that's not shilling. that's reality.
micron actually has the lowest available 2TB ssd available. they also have an 8TB ssd avaialble from enterprise. so to see a cheaper 4TB and mainstream 8TB from micron or anyone would be nice.
