A good guy with a gun stopped the massacre in gun-controlled Maryland today

A good guy with a gun stopped the massacre in gun-controlled Maryland today.

Gun owners 1
Anti gun faggots 0

Attached: 77C634BB-E6D1-4D32-9B03-1AC33B8292AF.jpg (1200x630, 152K)

Attached: 7QevmmN.jpg (1002x863, 63K)

>stopped a massacre
>a massacre

Attached: wouldntevenhappenwithoutgunsyoufuckingtwat.jpg (800x800, 68K)

Bad guy with gun killed 3 in gun filled chicago...

3-1

Checkmate

It's easy to argue something that won't affect you.

>guns are good because they stop guns
Wut

you do realize what massive moron your comment implicates right?
let me ask you honestly, do you really believe in this comment or OPs statement being reasonable?
And if so, what school did you get kicked out from?

I really wish this didn't happen. It doesn't fit in with what buzzfeed says and it makes me confused

Guns are objects, neither good nor evil.

Attached: bald-gun-girl.png (494x660, 484K)

>implying niggers killing other niggers matters

Drop a grenade of nerve gas in your bath and then tell me that objects can't be evil

yeah, but that's a ractionary measure. this shit needs to be stopped before it happens. i'm not saying "hurr durr ban all guns" because i'm not stupid. oughta have a much more involved gun buying process, involving advanced background checks, psychiatric evaluations for 1st time gun owners plus every 5 years. metal detectors in all public buildings as well. i'd gladly pay taxes for that.

Attached: F6.jpg (600x490, 76K)

Are you retarded?

Attached: 1519488885082.gif (645x773, 41K)

No I'm not from America

It's easy to argue a gun ban if you don't have any firearms.

Then you aren't important enough for your opinion to matter.

Attached: 1519679388388.jpg (720x736, 32K)

is this a marines meme?

B-b-but I neeeeeed guns so that I can overthrow the government!!!!!!!!! Me and Bobby-Joe gonna wrap ourselves in flags and defeat the entire army, because our guns DEFLECT BULLETS

Attached: 05615b34303b68423a3e4b5f8370918d7d0a1f.jpg (300x250, 24K)

i hope they make all gun illegal. i frequently rob houses and cars and i would start hitting up the real good targets in the suburbs if they dont have guns.

I'm important enough for my govt to prefer keeping me alive

Attached: 10334258_328507300664976_3177295131486048304_n.jpg (588x462, 32K)

No.

Attached: 1517778557734.png (1296x1458, 217K)

>psychiatric evaluations
The problem here is that anything could be considered a psychological problem in the future. Look at ((who)) controls the psychologist institutions. It's a slippery slope that will result in total gun control given enough time.

It was the schools police officer. Not some random guy with a gun trying to save people.

the reason of their existence however is, was and will always be to make something stop being alive.

i want to enable everyone around me to end my life within seconds if they just want so. Because obviously i could do the same... now that makes it safe.
I want everyone around me and me to have aids.
So i can finally stop worrying about it.

True, it is in the best interest for a slave master to not let their property die. Unless they can find cheaper slaves elsewhere.

Attached: 1519218648084.png (801x876, 212K)

Obviously the water would soak up the gas and it would wash down the drain. What are you trying to say?

Strawman.

People kill people so I don't want any people

if the usa had a civil war there would be upwards of 100 million people fighting and many people in the military would chose the citizens sides bring many weapons with them. not even tanks and jets can make a difference against hundreds of millions of armed citizens who are hunkered down.

Attached: Against tanks and Jets Arguement.png (872x886, 220K)

imagine wanting to getting cucked by the government like this

My mother still thinks that dubs are a sin but I know that trees are the better soldier. Zuze and Susan are the biscuit queen of the understand

Hes not a cop, he’s a county employee who provides security for the school.

this is why standard matter. I don't mean mild anxiety or depression. I mean schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, serious shit like that.

i don't really care about the debate that much but if the government wants to take my shit they'll probably do it. i'd rather turn in my guns and live then refuse and die.

Where's the gun?

Imagine thinking you're not already, and actually have a choice in the matter

*standards

Attached: 91D85E05-B79B-43CD-A513-33A75DB5095D.jpg (736x736, 80K)

bruh thats a deep fake

Strawman.

Guns kill guns so i dont want any guns?

>Guns can be used by good people to stop bad people with guns.

Fixed that for you.

Attached: 1521099815305.jpg (604x514, 57K)

But these standards can be changed. Trannies are no longer considered mentally ill socially, and I'm sure gender dysphoria will be removed from institutional instruction and literature.

Comrades, this is gun.
Laugh at shoe, get rekt

Attached: 92CFC2E8-8518-462E-BA90-0BB38F4CA417.jpg (800x1067, 321K)

In Maryland someone was shot. Meanwhile in Britain no one was shot. A man dropped a cup of tea, a day of mourning was announced

how about "stop making it easy for people to kill people?"

>gun filled Chicago

You mean the City with some of the strictest gun control laws in the country and decades of uncontested Democratic control? That Chicago? I think that score might be 4-0 actually.

According to the cdc guns in america prrevent 500 thousand crimes to 3.5 million crimes per year including rape and robbery and murder and assault and so on. the anti gunners are 100% the ones who dont care about the lives of americans. they would be happy banning guns and causing millions more victims and increased murder numbers as long they were victims of Illegal guns or victims of other weapons. numbers dont lie. the anti gunners are pushing for more victims by the millions and dont even care

Attached: 1420752373463.jpg (576x576, 104K)

Kids taking their dad's gun to murder people at school can't happen at all if daddy dearest doesn't own weaponry

500k-3.5m that is quite some margin of error mate. Also good to know that you guys admit your country is so fucked up that you require wild west vigilante forces to save you. This is why Russia doesn't invade: they're just sitting back laughing at you like the rest of us

>we need guns in case the evil government sends soldiers to take our guns away and trample on our rights
>the soldiers are heros no matter what! Support our troops! Get behind our president!

Choose one.

Attached: franklin.png (500x334, 111K)

Bullshit. The CDC isn't allowed to study gun related deaths and statistics.

But a law abiding citizen can use their gun to take down the kid that broke the law by stealing someone's weapon and shooting people.

Attached: cdf.jpg (272x272, 5K)

i hate the troops.
still want my guns
guns are beneficial to me
fuck the troops
fuck the oppresive government strongarm
LEGALIZE ALL PSYCHADELICS AND MARIJUANA
THE GOVERNMENT IS SHIT MAN

Attached: Irks me a little.png (240x240, 66K)

>The officer who fired at a student gunman at Great Mills High School in Maryland on Tuesday morning is Blaine Gaskill, a 34-year-old St. Mary’s County sheriff’s deputy with SWAT training who regularly provided security at the school.

You realize these officers are cops who just work at the school then resume normal duty after?

you see, your argument actually has value.
I was in the military for a long time and i have around 6 deployments to look back to.
some of them we're straight up combat clustered.

Now, i am not american but i served with your army and we were like brothers to each other.
I know where you people are comming from and i too like guns.

I am strictly against guns in public or anywhere outside a shooting range. I do realize that us-americans however have so much guns in their population that it would pretty unbalanced if you would take them away from the majority of good people.

The big issue here and in this whole conversation that i have never seen being adressed before as i see it is that
guns in a controlled enviroment designed for them are a good thing.
outside of that however they should not exist, ecspecially in the hands of untrained/damaged minds.

Attached: bj.jpg (475x356, 48K)

Thankfully he had a gun.

Well, you chose one. So ... Good. But lots of those redneck backwoods tards that yell about "we need guns cuz the government" are the same that are like "don't ever talk shit about the military. They are all heros" and I'm like "you do realize that if and when the government would try and take your guns they'll paint it as patriotic and it'll be unamerican to give up the guns." What will those flag waving progun military supporting faggots do then?

Kill yourself faggot

The only thing that can stop bad people's nukes is good people with nukes. So stop worrying about North Korea

Now you're getting it.

No need to worry about it. Just be prepared.

Unless you think we should nuke North Korea first.

I can't support that.

I'm also for responsible use of nuclear arms.

Attached: 1521120205887m.jpg (1024x503, 53K)

Hey won't need to if the kid can't take his dad's gun in the first place... How retarded/American are you

Is that before or after they told you faggots to just run and hide from bombers/shooters/acid attacks & sexual assaults, oh but because they don't let you have a gun, means there keeping you safe. K

So you don't mind dying as long as your murderer dies too. Gotcha.

Is it bad that the only thing I care about if we get nuked is if I'd be allowed to take the day off work? Like, if they blast Guam, or Hawaii, can I, in the mainland say it's so fucked up that I can't go to work and that'll be fine?

Not a socialist state so no they're not keeping me safe, but they are minimising risk by not having hundreds of millions of death tools out and about

> "b-b-b-b-b-b-b-but drumpft gop republicans white racists supremacists hitler kkk gun-toting bible-thumpers!!!!!"

He stopped those two kids from getting shot? He stopped the shooter, another kid, from getting shot?

If Kim Nuked Commiefornia, I would not really be upset.

Attached: 1517405318069.png (645x729, 90K)

Guess his dad never taught him responsible gun use. Either way, it wasn't the gun's fault.

There are worse things more readily available.

Everyone wags their fingers at school shootings.

What about the bombing of Bath Schools in Michigan?

Should we also ban Google because you can search for bomb recipes?

If someone wants to hurt people, they will find a way.

>He stopped more than 2 from getting shot

Fixed that for ya

Neither good or evil*

Nah.

Why live in fear?

>this triggers the NRA terrorist

Not a general fear in my life. Sorry.

Pretty sure a hammer would be a deadly tool if i hit someone hard enough with it, hell i could hit a bunch of people with a hammer and lets see them stop me as I'm hitting them with a hammer lol.

>I'm important enough for my govt to prefer keeping me alive
Shut up peasant. Free people are talking.

Attached: CHAD RAMPAGE.png (1198x420, 290K)

>ready made deathstick where you just point and shoot to activate its only function
>a particular mix of volatile chemicals that you have to concoct carefully, along with some sort of detonation device, in order to use them for a purpose other than what they are intended for
Hmmm yeah you're right these are exactly the same thing and one isn't at all easier than the other

amen

So 3 dead kids is your limit? You're cool with that? If it was 4would we then want to start trying to prevent the shooting from happening in the first place? Or would it take 5?

How many dead kids are OK with and when should we start trying to protect all kids, not just the 4th or 5th?

He can't reach Cali yet, retard. Also I WOULD be upset, but my thought process is
>we get nuked
>oh shit
>bad feels
>do people expect me to work with these bad feels?! We just got nuked!

So....would we have to go to work?

You know Chicago has gun control. So you must be wrong, gun control works.

1) that would be much easier to stop and you're retarded if you think otherwise
2) murder isn't a hammer's primary function whereas a gun's only function is to kill things

It's not about ease. It's about intent.

Like I said, if people want to hurt people, they will find a way.

You beat me to this post.

The glass is either half full or half empty; are you not okay with this good guy with a gun shooting that fucker? Did you want more casualties so you can piss and whine about “how bad guns are”?

Misleading argument. Chicago has tough gun laws, but everyone just goes to Indiana and buys the guns cuz they have almost no laws and it's really close by. So chicagos gun problem is a result of indianas shit laws.

Hahaha.

Probably.

I'd use PTO, though.

Gonna have to clean my gun if we're going to war.

Nonsense. I use my AR-15 primarily to stir cans of paint.

Ease is a massively important factor, if something is right there available to use then someone is far more likely to use it (whatever the use is) than if they have to actually do some prep

Tanks wouldn't even come into the equation. Modern wars are predominantly guerilla warfare. The deciding factor is knowing the terrain.
You cannot get your tanks anywhere if the bridges are blown. You cannot restock if the convoys are assaulted.

Moreover, an armed resistance to US military would very likely be supported and funded by russia among others.

Attached: 1487299390727.png (590x288, 63K)

Idiots act like there are exceptions to the second amendment. It doesn't say except crazy people or wife beaters. The only defense against a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. Everyone should carry a gun. Everyone. And when someone goes nuts they get shot before they can do much damage. That's how it's supposed to work.

So what you're saying is gun control doesn't work?

Attached: Gun control.jpg (480x351, 30K)

The last thing we need is a bunch of leftist idiots with guns.

>Modern wars are predominantly guerilla warfare.

False. Modern wars are usually legal battles in conference rooms and bars and brothels. Fought with bribery and black-mail and profit/loss charts.