The one argument to completely shut down gunfags is as follows: the strength/magnitude of gun control is inversely...

The one argument to completely shut down gunfags is as follows: the strength/magnitude of gun control is inversely proportional to the frequency of mass shootings.
For example, the US has frequent mass shootings and weak gun control. Other, more civilized countries with reasonable gun control have far less mass shootings. They cannot deny this fact.
In b4 the majority of gun deaths are nigger-on-nigger violence and ban cars, knives, junk food, etc.

Attached: 1506192203157.png (542x370, 126K)

Can you express as a function and make me a graph?

there is no scientific correlation between smoking cigarettes and contracting lung cancer, only speculation, non smokers develop cancer every day

lol ur mom gay and raised a fag

>there is no scientific correlation between smoking cigarettes and contracting lung cancer
Are you trolling or just retarded? Yes, people develop cancer(s) every day, but the probability of developing lung cancer specifically is greatly increased if you smoke cagrettes.

lol ur mom dumb and raised a retard

Stay mad kid

By supporting the NRA you have indirectly contributed to the murder of hundreds of thousands of people.

Lol?

Op cannot inb4
Niggers
Places with more reasonable gun control see this problem as well these days. Only with rape and acid.
Niggers, be they thw basic variety or the sand variety, are the problem. The weapons are not.

Lol classic gunfag "logic."
Yes, people will always find a way to harm other people if the desire is strong enough. I am talking about the link between the strength of gun control and the frequency of mass shootings. You cannot deny this simple mathematical relationship.

So you agree that even though less people will be shot the same amount of people will suffer death and maiming, but you'd like to get rid of the shootings anyway because... It would make you feel like you accomplished something...?

Other countries aren't America. You can't take away our gun because they are in our DNA. Gun control won't lead to less mass shootings because crazy people always get guns one way or another.

No. You're implying that there is a quota of dead/injured people that will be filled regardless of how it is done. Yes, sand niggers will do their sand nigger stuff with acid, knives and whatnot. The point is that their attacks are not as effective without guns. This thread isn't even about sand niggers though. This is about butthurt Americans being able to murder innocent people because of lax gun control.

Lol good god

Gun control isn't the issue. It's that the U.S.A. is a nation of lost, disconnected, ill-educated people who consume vast quantities of shit TV, shit food and are prescribed meds like there's no tomorrow.

The gun crime does lower in countries that have flat-out gun bans and heavy gun control.

But the murder rate stays the same.

Your argument is invalid.

Denial of the highest degree. Stay retarded kid.

>simple mathematical relationship
>doesn't post any statistics on it

Also, fun-fact you fucking dunce, in America 4 or more people killed at the same time is a mass-shooting.

>still has zero facts to back anything up
>BETTER SAY SOMETHIN GUD TO GET AT DEM MERICANS
>stay retarded
>DURR NAILED IT

So salty. Do you not understand functions? Probably not on account of the American education system.

So salty. Do you not understand functions? Probably not on account of the American education system.

25 years ago we had 200 mil guns in the US. Today we have 300 Mil guns in the hands of private citizens. The homicide rate using guns over the last 25 years has DROPPED by 50%

Please explain how guns are the problem once again.

We both know the the number of mass shootings is directly linked to how readily available guns are. Why deny this? It just makes you look childish.

No it hasn't and you know this. Sure, overall gun deaths due to nigger on nigger violence may have dropped but the problem isn't about niggers killing the niggers. The problem is with angry people getting weapons with ease due to poor control and going out and murdering people in public. This has been trending upwards since Columbine.

Kek this post is the epitome of salt.

-------------------------------------------------------
This is the Troll Line.
Everyone above it has been trolled.

You're right, but you don't even really need to discuss frequency, but rather just the number of mass shootings in general. The US has very, very lax gun control compared to other countries and the number of mass shootings is obviously directly related to this. The issue isn't even with overall gun violence (though obviously it is also a problem that scales with the strength of gun control). The issue is with how often a crazy gets guns and uses them to kill people in public, with the intention of killing as many people as possible before killing themselves. This is a direct result of shit gun control. The gun retards will of course deny this but you're 100% on the mark op. Americans can't understand this though because they don't understand basic functions.

Can someone explain how America has lax gun laws and why there are so many mass shootings? The answer is obvious but I would love to see the mental gymnastics that you go through to justify your murderous hobby.

The gunfags will go off on a tangent about sand niggers raping people and throwing acid, and then go on about bombs and knife violence while the point of how easy it is for someone to get guns with the sole purpose of murdering people in public goes so far over their heads that it enters LEO.

Roll

Attached: 1521257561195.jpg (480x463, 42K)

>majority of gun deaths are nigger-on-nigger violence
This.

Well, somebody's got to do it.

Not really relevant to the issue of being able to buy a gun due to shit gun control with the intention of murdering people before taking your own life though.

you do realize, that gun is just a tool? That the problem is social, there's got to be something wrong with you if you want to shoot up people. Just by removing guns you don't solve shit, cause you can easily make a bomb with a blueprint on the internet or somethink like that? look in europe, strick gun control, so people use bombs or a truck to drive into a crowd. The diffrence is that in europe it's the terorist who do that and in america your own citizens

Prior to the 60's there was far less gun control and no school shootings. You can't deny this fact either. Blaming video games and the internet for mass shootings has the same "legitimacy" as an argument as blaming the availability of guns.

1776 WILL RISE AGAIN IF YOU TRY TO TAKE OUR GUNS!!!