How smart is Sup Forums

How smart is Sup Forums

Attached: math.jpg (1920x1080, 74K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/irvi5_v3IMU
youtube.com/watch?v=Rb5EfPVK8XQ
fasttory.com/GFQb
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

9

9

1

trips of honour

>1

1

>Do u retard?

1

Attached: 1516740431718.png (314x295, 105K)

How small is op's dick?

>not posting your answer

(1 + 2) = 3
6 ÷ 2(3)
6 ÷ 6
= 1
There's the answer retards

youtu.be/irvi5_v3IMU

It's 9.

6/2(1+2)

Solve what's in the parenthesis.

6/2*3

Order of operations states we continue to multiplication and division. When both are present, we solve from left to right. So first we divide.

3*3

Multiply.

9

I'm fucking retarded at math and even I know this bullshit.

1

1
>trips went full retard

>multiplies
>then divides
When do you start Middle School?

this, I don't even fathom his they think its 1

It's 9.

First you do 1+2 which is 3. Then you proceed going from left to right so 6/2 is 3 and then you have not shown multiplication so you end up with 3*3 so its 9. It cant be 1 because if not stated otherwise the general default ommited sign is going to be * which is a common rule in algebra.

Also what people fail to see is that the general default rule is to proceed from left to right so they cant do multiplication first.

Parenthesis
Exponent
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction

All these fags doing math. Numbers dont even exist, get a brain morans

The answer is 6

What most people fail to remember is that it isn't multiplication THEN division. It's multiplication AND division, meaning when you have both you solve the problem from left to right.

I have discovered a truly marvelous proof that OP is a fag but the character limit is too small to contain it

Attached: Field automorphisms & Galois groups.webm (493x480, 1.95M)

Oof, I did 6÷3 ugh...

6/2*3 Tell me again why you chose to do 2*3 first because the parenthesis rule only applies if there are more numbers in it. There is a rule to proceed from left to right which somehow is everyone forgetting it exists. Also its more like parenthesis > exponents > multiplication and division > addition and subtraction

1

All these fags saying it's 1. There is no preference to multiplication before division because they are inverse operations so they are equal.

>that sure showed me

>underrated post
We'll call it user's last theorem

So what's the answer, pops?

-1/12

I am a whore

Attached: 1451855418122.png (388x424, 296K)

>two answers posted
>1
>9
>user says the answer is not 1
>whatever could he mean??1

christ this again, find x Sup Forumstards:

6 ÷ 2(x + 2) = 1

KABOOM BOMBSHELLLL

Oh dear, you are smarter than i thought you would be! So youare saying that the problem is up to interpretation of the one who is solving it? Gosh golly, pops!

>(1/3) - 2
Surely you meant 9

Imagine being so retarded that you couldn't determine which set an element belongs to and then felt compelled to claim that simple arithmetic didn't have a solution

6 * 0.5 * 3 = 9

ITT brainlets think multiplication and division are unique

The ways I see

6 / 2(1+2)

Classic Solve Parentheses First

6 / 2(3) or it could look like 6 / 2 + 4 with factoring
6 / 6 3 + 4
1 7

When you learn PEM/DA/S is only a learning tool

6 / 2(1+2) Implied multiplication of the parentheses Looks like

6 / 2 X (1+2)
6 / 2 X 3
3 x 3 or 6 / 6

If we look at the problem as a fraction
6
--------------
2(1+2)

6 6
----------- -------- same thing
2 + 4 2(3)

And the nine answer provided above

find x is what I said

Please
Excuse
My
Dear
Aunt
Sally

Attached: 1513262745309m(2).jpg (724x1024, 75K)

Attached: 20180324_143412.jpg (1080x1976, 167K)

Ok asshole do it the other way
[2(1+2)]/6
6/6
1

the answer is 2.33333333 repeating of course

>3 x 3 or 6 / 6
This was the point at which I knew you were trolling and not retarded

does your dear aunt sally have a big ass?

hole

6/2(x+1)=1
6=2(x+1)
3=x+1
2=x

wew

>implying (1/3) - 2 isn't x when 6/2(x+2)=1
"Surely you meant 9" is what I said

6 ÷ 2x[(1÷x) + (2÷x)] =
3x(1÷x) + (2÷x) =
3x(3÷x) =
3(3) =
?

-2.3333333

that wasn't the equation I gave, but it makes no difference. Now substitute the value of 'x' you found back into your original equation.

>I'm dying
How are you going to make the exact same mistake after you've just been corrected?!

retards.

the thread.

find x, and tell the class what you have found it to be

2.71828

yes.

I realized I performed the inverse of a few operations. X is actually 2 in this context. Are you sure you didn't mean 9?

(1 + 2) = 3
6 ÷ 2(3)
6 ÷ 6
= 1
Conclusion;
Jet gas can't melt concrete

6 ÷ 2 ÷ (1/3) = ?

>6 ÷ 2(x + 2) = 1

x can only equal '1' in this equation, which yields:

6 ÷ 2(1 + 2) = 1

This mans in uni

youtube.com/watch?v=Rb5EfPVK8XQ

IM PICKLE RICK!

6/2(1+2)
6/(2+4)
6/(6)
6/6
9

Boingo

Attached: 20170803_203719.jpg (1136x1074, 567K)

>6/2(x+2)=1
>3(x+2)=1
>(1/3)-2=x

>6/2(x+2)=1
>1/2(x+2)=(1/6)
>X+2=(1/3)
>X=(1/3)-2

>6/2(x+2)=9
>3(x+2)=9
>X+2=3
>X=3-2=1

Surely you meant 9 tho

>so close

Fucking dammit.....

I'm usually the one posting these, happy it took off.

Attached: mathituphomo.png (665x685, 11K)

NINEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE for the thousandth time. idiots

Law of sines, nogs

6/2(1+2)
First, we have to factor the 2 into the parenthesis because signless, implicit multiplication has to be done first. Of course, we could do it the other way around without changing the answer. We get either:
6/(2+4)
or
6/2(3)
Now we solve the parenthesis, while keeping in mind that the implicit multiplication means that the 2 is a part of the parenthesis. We get:
6/6 = 1
regardless of which way we chose.

>6/2(x+2)=1
>3(x+2)=1
>(1/3)-2=x

This is not how algebra is done

Underrated post

C = 180-31-90= 59 degrees
Sin(31)=BC/15 ; BC=sin(31)*15
Cos(31)=AB/15 ; AB=cos(31)*15

Not today b8

9

Ok

>1/6=2(x+2)
>1/3=x+2
>1/3-2=x

post it in polish notation

>1/6=2(x+2)
>1/3=x+2
>1/3-2=x

Neither is this. You've tried to cancel a division with a division.

N, n, n, n, n, n, n, n, no.
First we divide the 6 by 2, since multiplication and division are equivalent. This gives us a 3 which we then multiply with the parenthetical terms. We then take those terms and add them, giving us 9.
6/2(1+2)
3(1+2)
3+6
9

You are solving it as though it is the problem:
6/(2(1+2))
which is:
6/(2+4)
6/6
1

Don't believe me? Put it into any calculator.

Attached: fredarmisen[1].jpg (980x653, 73K)

fasttory.com/GFQb

/6=2(x+2)
Divide the two not multiply
1/12=x+2
1/12-2=x

I don't even know why ya'll are bringing variables into this, just wanted to correct your post

bro

>6/2=1/(x+2)
>2/6=x+2
>(1/3)-2=x
Pretty sure I didn't

C = 180-57-90= 33 degrees
Sin(57)=BC/75 ; BC=sin(57)*75
Cos(57)=AB/75 ; AB=cos(57)*75

6=/=(1/6)
Thanks for playing

It's 1
Order of Operations tells us:
>Resolve Parentheses
>Carry out Exponentiation (N/A)
>Multiply and Divide from left to right
>Add and Subtract from left to right
So we do:
6 ÷ 2(1 + 2)
6 ÷ 2(3)
6 ÷ 6
>B-b-but you multiplied before you divided
That's right I did retard, because I had to do that do resolve the parentheses, which comes before the multiply and divide step.

Maybe you should apply for Newton's recently vacated chair at Skegness university?

Maybe, but I'll have to teach user simple arithmetic first

Fuck OP's shitty writing amirite

6 ÷ 2(1 + 2) =
6 * ½ * 3 =
[6(1+2)]/2 =
6*0.5*3 =
6 ÷ 2 ÷ ⅓ =

Attached: fasfsf.gif (300x169, 571K)

>he doesn't know that parentheses don't exist if they don't contain operations

Is this meant to be 6/(2(1+2)) or (6/2)*(1+2)?
The way this is set up is retarded.

I am basing my math off your first equation which is
>/6=2(x+2)
1/6 divided by 2 = (1/6)*(1/2)=(1/12)
Dingus

/2=1/(x+2)
/6=x+2
>>(1/3)-2=x
oh shit, you're not trolling, but his is also wrong.

This