How come Marvel always wins?

how come Marvel always wins?
are they that much better at making movies than Warner/DC?

Well... yeah

I didnt know Batman Returns was that high

I like it, but I thought most people hated it

>rotten tomatoes
you might aswell posted your own scores, they'd be as much use to the rest of us

>superman returns better than man of steel

WB made TDR so GIRFUY OP

There's only one good movie in that whole list. Can Sup Forums guess it?

They actually understand the characters they're adapting and don't just try to throw everything into a movie.

It's amazing that they're literally doing what the mcu did backwards.

Batman and Robin

Yeah returns is actually trying to tell an interesting story not just be destruction porn.

>the same few superhero movies being made over and over
what a depressing image
especially the fox one

>how come Marvel always wins?
They did a good work on making one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises then for sure. Seriously each movie following the quirky Avengers and other superheroes as they fight their dull villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the concrete cinematography, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Marvel Studios vetoed the idea of Tarantino directing Iron Man; they made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for the comic books. The MCU might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

I assume that list was made by some user when bvs came out. It's still missing DCs greatest masterpiece though which was Jonah Hex. An updated version would be cool for future shitposting.

>He can't into Snyderkino

Useless pleb

>marvelcuck needs to feel loved
if you only like a movie because it got a certified fresh ok then

Gee I wonder!

>deadbeat dad Superman getting his shit pushed in by Kumar and lifting a kryptonite island being the most exciting set piece
>interesting story

people keep posting shit like this without realizing it only proves the bias and shilling from reviewers
>Thor, AOU, Ant-Man, IM3 certified fresh
>Guardians that high
>Guardians higher than TWS

Where's the Hulk and the Blade movies, smart dick.

>Nocturnal Animals has a 7.4
>Dr. Strange has a 7.3
What's wrong with this?

When the game is SJW Tomatoes, do you want to win?

Makes me tink

One is the average of 253 reviews while the other has 80.

At Least snyderman didn't shit over the reeves movies, returns literally ruins the only 2 good superman movies from that era

Are you trying to say that single jewish women control rotten tomatoes?

>rotten tomatoes
why not just post IMDB?

Why not post the Avg. Ratings instead of Tomatometer?

I don't understand why people care about the Tomatometer so much.

One would say that Rotten Tomatoes' system just doesn't work at all.

MIGHT AS WELL HAVE SLID THIS GEM IN YOUR LIST YOU FUCKING FAGGOT OP

29% for BvS is just ridiculous, it wasn't bad at all and better than a shitload of other movies on there.
>Thor - 77%
lol just lol

this desu

remember user, at least half of all people are idiots

You're missing one of Fassbender's finest.

the source is better

Yeah he just shit all over the whole character and mythos by making him a joyless, "why me God" faggot.

oh I see, so you never actually read comics and like to straw man movies, carry on

>are they that much better at making movies than Warner/DC?
The difference between Marvel and DC is that DC makes unwatchable 2edgy4u trash that is only good for meme material. While Marvel makes vapid normie trash with very occasional salvageable moments.

It's the difference between dragging your ass through broken beer bottles and eating shit in the hopes of finding corn. You don't want to do either, but ultimately eating shit is the least bad experience and hey, you might find some corn through the process.

Marvel took risks making capeshit with moderate budgets back before it was a sure-fire hit with Iron Man and then went from there, playing things real slow and building up to Avengers. DC did not do this and are now shitting and farting and throwing up all over the floor trying to catch up to ten years of prep in a couple years with Zach Snyder.

Marvel movies aren't high art but they are fun, stupid action movies and know their place. DC tries to be pretentious high art but utterly lacks the talent to do so and it comes across like a 16 year old drama student's facebook posts about philosophy.

Well said.

Was about to post something like this. But you said it better than I would have.

B R A V O
R
A
V
O

There was a 2nd ghost rider movie?

Of this image I would say that Marvel has a more diverse pool of heroes to make movies with.

Yeah. It's actually better than the first one if you like camp.

>single jewish women control rotten tomatoes

I'm sure most of the reviews are written by single daughters of hollywood executives, so kinda?

They had a plan. They stuck to that plan. It works when you don't have uncertainty and a vision for each film.

You'll notice the strongest time of DC was when Nolan was making the Batman films and Sony's strongest was the original Raimie Spiderman trilogy.

DC fucked up with putting their faith in Snyder when his trial movie got middling reviews.

When you think about it DC characters are pretty shitty. Most are just different versions of Superman. You have female Superman, you have water Superman, you have space Superman, etc, etc.
Also the fact that DC keeps reusing their top 2 heroes and villains over and over again. Making people completely sick of seeing them on screen.

They're good at making servicable films with cgi grand finales

Currently the others are bad at it.

How is this a problem?

Dramas are generally more controversial and thus get lower scores that blockbusters, and all three films have close to the same score. Nocturnal animals actually has the highest score, then Strange, then Hacksaw Ridge, and Hacksaw Ridge is only that low because Gibson directed it and a lot of people still hold grudges. Seriously, read the reviews, many say the film is good but they're knocking some points off because of Mel.

And the films have the number of reviews in order of most press (Dr Strange, then Hacksaw Ridge, then Nocturnal Animals) which also makes sense: things that get a lot of coverage get lots of reviews.

Pretty normal stuff, honestly, and no evidence of corruption at all. If anything, it shows the opposite: the trends you would expect to see naturally are there, meaning tampering is probably non-existent.

>all fresh WB DC movies made by competent people that know what they're doing
>all rotten WB DC movies made by incompetent people that have no idea what they're doing
>Disney Marvel movies have all been overseen by Feige
It's a mystery.

Really makes you think