You noticed how he, the moment he started playing with an actual proper basketball team, buttfucked LeDiva hard and with no lube? Face the music, LeBeta fags, the hard times have only just begun for you.
>literally the most dominant FMVP since Kobe's 2010
>literally the most efficient FMVP since Shaq Quill O'Neill
>literally dropped 35 ppg and LeHairline
How does it feel, LeCramp ricchiones?
>most dominant FMVP since Kobe's 2010
>6-24 in game 7
I obviously meant 2009, Hassan, thanks for correcting the record, nice to see Germanistan's gibz are enough for you to afford a quick google search.
nice basketball thread
zzzzzzzzz
If you replace Durant with any other all-star 3 in the league (for example, Hayward), the Warriors still probably win. Even before adding Durant they were the best team in basketball by a comfortable margin, the only teams that could really threaten them were Lebron's Cavs and (ironically) the KD/Westbrook Warriors.
Replace Lebron with any other all-star and the Cavs get swept, losing by 30 points every time. KD is an amazing player, and he's the reason why the outcome of the Finals was a foregone conclusion, but the odds already heavily favored the Warriors.
>holding Finals MVP trophy
DEBATE THIS
If Cleveland would have lost the 16 final like they should have it would've been interesting to see if Durant tries to make a move somewhere else
>replace durant with melo
>warriors lose in the 2nd round
Switch kd and LeBron and cavs never win a title
KD said he would have stayed in OKC if GSW won. You can all shit on WB for being inefficient and making stupid decisions sometimes but that was the most talented duo in the history of basketball.
>Transformed a 73 win who lost in game 7 of the finals into to a 67 win team which won the finals in 5 games,
DEBATE DIS!
Basketball is not sports and basketball players are not athletes. Take this scripted garbage entertainment to
Why is LeBron such a shitty gm? Does he enjoy getting embarrassed?
The Warriors went 73-9 with Harrison fucking Barnes, I think they would be fine.
Debate a chip over no chip? Pretty clear conclusion there.
What I wonder is what if instead of KD leaving, he stayed and they signed another free agent? Derozan, Whiteside, and Horford were all available last summer. Hayward, Griffin, and Lowry are available right now. OKC had a 3-1 lead on the Warriors without any of these guys. Add one of them and the Thunder become the best team in the West.
But I'm not sure what OKC's cap situation was like in 2016 so maybe that wasn't an option.
Horford was gonna sign if kd stayed he said. They would have definitely knocked out gsw this year if he stayed but probably lose to cavs
>If you replace Durant with any other all-star 3 in the league (for example, Hayward), the Warriors still probably win
Haha, no. Faggot.
kevin durant's style is unaesthetic as fuck, he looks like an handicapped man when he plays
>a Muslim talking about basketball
Nice argument faiz
Yes, of course they do. Did you watch the 2016 Finals? It went to 7 games and required superhuman performances by Lebron, and that was without Durant. The Warriors could have comfortably won with Hayward or some other all-star 3 in the lineup. They also could have won with a regular 3 in the lineup (although it would have been closer). Durant wasn't necessary for he Warriors to win. Durant was overkill.
with Melo - lose
with Gayward - lose
with George - lose, he's mentally weak
with Butler - yeah, you can have that one
Why are we even discussing hypothetical things that never happened and will never happen instead of - facts? Are you a libfag perhaps? And are you suggesting they'd repeat 73-9 and go 16-1 had they kept Barnes instead of Durant? Are you really that insane and buttblasted LeTrash lost?
The Warriors probably would have won without adding Durant. Their 2016 lineup was more than capable of beating the Cavs. Like I already pointed out, it took something amazing from the Cavs to beat the Warriors in 7, and it still came down to the final seconds. The Warriors were already favorites without Durant. If you replace Barnes with any all-star 3, the Warriors win easily.
>repeat 73-9
They didn't do that even with Durant. And who cares? The regular season is meaningless.
>go 16-1
Again, who cares about 16-1? Is there a 16-1 trophy? No. All that matters is the title, which the Warriors would have won without Durant.
>Warriors would lose with Melo, Hayward, or George in place of Durant
I can't tell if you're trolling or you're really this stupid, GSW was up 3-1 when they had Barnes. You think they wouldn't improve by adding Melo/Hayward/George?
>which the Warriors would have won without Durant
But they wouldn't have won it with Barnes, that's the whole point, numbnut.
>GSW was up 3-1 when they had Barnes
And they blew it. Try again, Jorge.
OKC had a much worse team than the Cavs and Durant defeated the Spurs. LeBeta is a ballhog. He would kill the chemestry in the Warriors
>the most talented duo in the history of basketball.
>most talented duo in the history of basketball
Not even close dude.
They lost a good chunck of their bench and Durant is way less ball dominant than those memechuckers
Imagine living in such a fucked up headspace that you interject the "liberal" boogeyman line in essentially every conversation you have
t. buttblasted bronsexual who wept the tears of joy when lecramp endorsed hillary
epic, my man
>most dominant FMVP
>didnt even deserve MVP and only got it because hes Durant.