>Would you not rather be free pauper than a rich slave?
well we aren't slaves as members of the EU.
>Migrants make a net contribution... to the feeling of displacement of Britons.
you're right, we should base all international political decisions on feelings and other non quantifiable factors.
>If there are unfilled nurse jobs, let them be unfilled.
good idea, let people die, that'll show those bloody continentals
>Perhaps the NHS will see sense and put more money into training native Britons, who are just as biologically capable as anyone else.
There is a lack of people willing to be trained as nurses in this country.
>The EU (or EEC, as it was) oversaw the complete destruction of shipbuilding and coal-mining in my city (you may guess where I'm from then), in preference for inferior European coal and ships.
Shipbuilding is totally non viable pretty much everywhere outside of asia now, and leaving the EU won't change that. Likewise, coal mining just simply is not viable any longer in this country. Leaving the EU doesn't solve any of the issues you've raised.
Most farm labourers are eastern European though, and likewise Europeans have a strong presence in the city, these are facts. And many farmers will tell you that they won't see any Brits even applying for these jobs. How would you explain that?
>Money doesn't fucking diagnose illness or create spaces in hospitals all by itself. All the people coming into the country aren't qualified Doctors or Surgeons.
no, but the money pays (or at least should) for the facilities and people that do those things.
>The NHS is understaffed, that is the main issue and more measly contributions from more migrants is not going to solve that problem.
If there is more revenue generated from taxation, then more money can be spent on the NHS, allowing the hiring of more staff.
>What exactly are you referring to here?
Toyota, Honda Nissan; here because we're in the EU, among others.
