What direction will they take the series in next?

What direction will they take the series in next?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=UWROBiX1eSc
twitter.com/AnonBabble

It's obvious they're gonna ignore the Paul Feig movie. Sony are dumb but not even they're dumb enough to make a sequel to that shit. Ivan Reitman will once be the king of Ghostbusters and Paul Feig will continue to rot in movie jail.

Pretty sure that they want to make a Slimer spin-off solo movie.

Also rumors of a movie taking place in the high tech future.

And a animated movie somewhere.

I love that misogyny is always blamed, and not the movie just being God-awful.

An all kids cast ghostbusters movie, called Ghosties.

An all black cast ghostbusters movie, called Ghosts in da Hood. Sequel will be called Ghosts in da Hood 2: Ghosthustlers.

>blaming misogyny for the movie's failure
It was just shit.

Will the failures of those movies be blamed on antinatalists and the KKK respectively?

Low budget Ghosties would probably be a money making hit that sells a lot of merch.

I was thinking the same thing

Talking animals that are also ghostbusters.

1. Never let Paul Feig direct again
2. Make an actual movie with a script not a 2-hour SNL sketch
3. Nostalgia bait live action movie with old ghostbusters returning in some capacity
4. Animated movie and TV series
5. Lots and lots of metchandise

>misogyny from the darkest corners of the internet destroyed the movie
Not so fast you hackfrauds youtube.com/watch?v=UWROBiX1eSc

>tried to turn spiderman into a cinematic universe to ape off the mcu
>failed
>tried to turn ghostbusters into a cinematic universe
>failed
>trying to turn 21 jumpstreet into a cinematic universe
>trying to turn iphone emoji movie into a cinematic universe
What the fuck is wrong with these people

6. Hire the It's Always Sunny cast to be the new Ghostbusters

Everyone wants the McU money

The Jump Street universe will probably be successful.

>Misogyny
But movie was for little girls

>>trying to turn iphone emoji movie into a cinematic universe
normies are so vapid and retarded, there's no way this movie won't be huge

>not Spooks in da Hood

Replacing all the Ghostbusters with abbo australians

>We are going to keep losing money, and you'll like it!

More dancing, less ghosts.

And more utterances of the word "fuck" in the extended cut. You know, for the kids.

>DUUUUUUUUUUUDE
>LET'S TAKE THE IPHONE RIGHT AND MAKE A FAKE APP AND FOR THE MOVIES SAKE JUST USE THAT APP TO CATCH GHOST!
>Let's get an Asian QT, a giant Amazonian negress with an afro, a Mexican, and so.e sort of Arab! You know for the whiny fag warriors.
>the bad guy will be hold it...DONALD TRUMP!!!
>And finally we can have some guest appearances and a lot of Anime references because writing an actual script takes hard work...

>the darkest corners of the internet
>Sup Forums
>darkest
>corner
>the

C'mon now

>Adam Chitwood
More like SHITwood!!!

Let Sony sink. Fuck them already.

ya know when i heard they were making an angry birds movie like 4-5 years ago i kept thinking "nah that shit is already old, no way will that movie make any money" and then they did make money!
now im thinking how, HOW are they gonna make a emoji movie?
and while i type this i realized i just cant give a shit.

Make the guys from the Regular Show make it since they're good with supernatural shit

do you think the person who made this is proud?
because they really shouldnt be.

as far as normies are concerned Sup Forums might as well be "the darkest corner". I mean it is a website that worships a nazi frog and steals jennifer lawrence's hommade porno pics!

>An all black cast ghostbusters movie, called Spooks

>liberal media unironically uses the term "post-truth" while labeling pepe as a symbol of racist hate in the same breath
l o v i n g

e v e r y

l a u g h

people remember that?
sheeit i got all of those pics saved on a flash drive somewhere. totally forgot about the leaks.

>take nude photo
>get mad when other people see it
I will never understand this. If you don't want to be treated like a whore don't act like one.

>yfw anus splinters.

Transexual Ghostbusters

maybe if they chose female comedians who are actually funny

Straight to DVD.

I don't even know where they're going with those terms.

"Post-truth" = everything we don't think is right someone else believes is a lie?
"Fake news" = everything that doesn't come from CNN is a lie?

Its like the liberal way is to be as condescending, sophomoric, belligerent, whiny and cliquish as possible.

I used to be liberal but now am just moderate and slightly right because they won't cut all this shit out like "post-truth". Fuck the arrogance and dogma of believing like you have 100% of the truth and the other side has 0%, if its "post" maybe its even negative truth the whole thing is just confusing.

Marv-El will be the main baddie of the next movie

How is this possible isn't sony in the shitter financially?

FAWKIN' HOMERUN, CHIPPERSON!!!

I chick in my college thought Sup Forums was the deepweb

>to fill the cast with female comedians set off a seemingly unending screed of misogyny in the darkest corners of the internets
>the darkest corners of the internets

I love when they do this. They try to paint all opposition as irrational and crazy misogynysts who are die-hard "haters" simply because the characters were female.

Never mind the fact that they were just B-to-C-list female comedians and the writing was so ham-handed that even walruses found it sloppy, nope it's the fact that those vaginas just make those weird loner misogynysts so mad!!!

And then, there's the way they paint these "misogynyst antagonizer" boogeymen as some niche group, some isolated fringe of society, some dark little corner where a CLEARLY MISGUIDED AND IRRATIONAL minority exist who ARE OBVIOUSLY TOO IGNORANT TO GET IT because they challenge the status quo.

I mean yeah, if you're talking about actual people who are real die-hard misogynysts who hate anything simply because it shows women in a positive light regardless of any other factors (like, guys who hated Alien just because Ripley was the main character) ARE a real minority. Those boogeymen the SJWs scare each other with are a seriously insignificant minority that have no impact on the world.

And that's what I find so funny. If this minority they speak of, these ignorant few who crawl out of their dark little corners are so few due to being so ignorant and misguided (because obviously the majority of society are "rational" and "intelligent" people who follow the status quo without question, right?), then why the fuck did the movie flop? If the majority of the population are "good, smart, free-thinking (lol) people who support women", then why the fuck didn't the movie at least make its money back?

The only answer is that not even SJWs could warrant spending the $15-$20 on this garbage, not even with the added bonus of supporting women in the media industry.

The movie was shit. Get over it.

>it's a let's blame misoginy to distract from how shitty the movie was episode

>The movie was shit. Get over it.

Tell that to the people writing these articles.

It's actually kind of funny.

Reddit/Tumblr/Facebook/Buzzfeed go on about the "dark corners" of the internet, like, the poor and stupid few who live in these "dark corners" are oblivious and uninformed because they are a minority who shut themselves off from the real world around them.

But then you realize that these "dark corners" of the internet they describe are literally just every website that isn't Reddit/Tumblr/Facebook/Buzzfeed, and they are actually the minority who shut themselves off from the world, stay in their hugbox, and refuse to let in any bad, evil, dissimilar views that might do something nasty like make them change their mind or consider alternative viewpoints.

They scream at people for being antagonistic and closed-minded, yet refuse to even listen to a word they say, and just want to exert their power at something they don't like. The irony is so blatant and obvious that I'm not even surprised it goes right over their heads.

>the movie failed because misogynists
they're still pushing this narrative?

Inb4 DURR POLITICS/ELECTION
I know you're talking about "small L" liberals, basically SJWs in general.

I'm pretty sure their concept of "Post-truth" is the idea that someone's stance/opinion is intentionally removed from the "truth" or "facts".
Example:
>"THING X IS GOING TO SUCK!"
>thing X turns out to be really good, and deep down they actually liked it because it was objectively great
>"W-WELL, THING X WAS ACTUALLY BAD BECAUSE OF UNRELATED AND UNTRUTHFUL REASONS Y AND Z, PLEASE TAKE MY SIDE ON THINGS SO I'M NOT PROVEN TO BE IGNORANT, WRONG, AND ALONE!"
They gave it a catchy nickname like "post-truth" because what they've done is essentially created yet another convenient tool to use and share, to convince themselves that they are inherently right and anyone who disagrees with them is not just inherently wrong, but KNOWS that they are wrong, and are just trying to spread confusion over TRUTH and FACTS for damage control.

Ironically, their notion of "post-truth" allows them to fall prey to the exact same trappings they believe "post-truthers" to be part of.

Now, whenever they are confronted with a differing opinion or contradictory FACTS and TRUTHS, they can just stick their fingers in their ears and say W-WELL I'M ACTUALLY RIGHT AND YOU'RE WRONG AND YOU'RE JUST TRYING TO SPREAD POST-TRUTH TO CONFUSE PEOPLE!

"Fake news" is just an example of these same groups believing and spreading those "post-truths" they invented. They see factual evidence refuting their claims, and instead of challenging it or considering the results of these facts, they simply stick their fingers in their ears again, this time saying "THIS IS FAKE NEWS THEY'RE SPREADING LIES TO PUSH THEIR AGENDA AND NONE OF THIS IS TRUE OR REAL!"

Basically, it's just SJWs being so indulgent in their irrational, whiny, self-important, oblivious, and ignorant mindsets that they've invented excuses to indulge in them further.

Just give the rights to Disney already

>Let Sony sink. Fuck them already.

Sony films can hemorage money all they want.

Pic related made enough money last year to offset all of the losses (both film and hardware).

>Sony exec #1: we lost $150 on ghostbusters
>Sony Exec #2: Thats ok. Just release a new Tamamo variant for the next event.
>Sony is saved

As long as Japanese men are playing FGO and collecting lewd girls and fluffy tails Sony can afford another dozen ghostbuster flops.

It's not just the films though, even their console department is selling shit at a loss.

Every fad shrivels and dies out in gookland. Sony is barely afloat as it is.

What you ranted can also be applied to Sup Forums with only a few terminology changes. Realize the fact that sjws/pol are the sides of the same coin and the best thing to do is to make them have obese hate fuck to get rid of the limpdick lack of sexual tension.

They should just make a all female Ghostbusters with an attractive cast.

...

Hey, just because I'm calling out SJWs for their bullshit doesn't mean I'm defending Sup Forums's endless frothing on the other side of the fence.

Blind devotion to any extreme is never a good thing. I may tend to side with the Sup Forums and/or Sup Forums perspective a little more, but I'm not going to go and say that they've got things 100% right either.

literally no one used these as arguments except the ironic faggots and the people driving the bullshit who deleted valid complaints like:

why redo the exact same story?
why have the characters focus on the fact they're women if you're just making the movie accessible to everyone?
why cast a male actor who is worth 10x the combined female cast as a dropkick idiot who you make fun of all movie, this didn't happen to any women in the originals?
why bring back the 3 original cast members only to mock them?
why does the cgi look bad?
why do the actors look like they don't care about acting in this film, and just yell and scream every line?
why the fuck is there a dance number?
why is the villain a cucked white male whose whole motivation is that he's lonely, and when the ghostbusters meet him they trick him by pretending to be interested in him rather than just saying he needed help?

Whole thing was fucked from day one.

>internets
mmm.

>muh soggy knee
What did (((they))) mean by this?