Why didn't he just cast a spell to destroy all the horocruxes?

why didn't he just cast a spell to destroy all the horocruxes?

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.me/11730851
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

why didn't they just use the eagles to fly the horcruxes to mordor?

>It's probably because..

why didn't you just write the series?

Why didnt he just cast himself out of one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>tfw too intelligent not to realize it's a terrible idea to make horcruxes out of objects that people can actually find instead of dropping it into the ocean or teleportation it into an anonymous cubic meter of the earths deep crust and then memory charming myself so i don't even know where they are

You could just say that Horcruxes need to have an "emotional tie" to where they are or some shit.

holy shit how has no one ever thought of or addressed this?

this user must be a genius

Is this the birth of an epic new pasta?

The Cursed Child showed that there is a Time Turner that lets you change the past. No reason for not going back in time and just killing baby Voldemort

Why haven't you voted yet?

>Sup Forums picks the best HP flick
strawpoll.me/11730851

HI Hannah aka "queen dragon lady" :^)

>new

Yeah lol, really glad I made this pasta, proud of it :)

They wouldnt have been able to make more movies....

You must be new here

I'm just now realizing this pasta is a Harold Bloom quote.

Oh boy, it's this copypasta again.

You must be new here

fucking retard thinks it was a movie. It twas a book -__-

Probably safer in the moons deep crust.

>Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg

as long as you keep posting this, I will keep correcting you. Spielberg turned it down. At the very least update your shit meme to be correct.

You're autistically nitpicking a movie that was pretty competent and enjoyable - qualities that set it apart from one of the dullest shitposts in the history of Sup Forums shitposts. Each shitpost following /lit/ NEETs and their pals from /r9k/ as they fight assorted kinographers has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the lack of film analysis the shitpost's only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of images and pasta to make fantasy unfantastical, to make witchcraft seem plebeian.

Perhaps the die was cast when Quentin vetoed the idea of shitposting on /lit/. Posting the pasta on Sup Forums, he made sure it would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for his (You)s. The shitpost might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly anti-intellectual in its refusal of critique and watching for the plot. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the shitposts are funny though
>"No!"

The writing is dreadful; the main text is terrible and the troll jpg isn't much better. As I read, I noticed that every time he shitposts, Quentin writes that "Atlas Shrugged is a God-tier form of art."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that shitpost was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several hundred thousand times. I was incredulous. The shitposter's mind is so governed by spamming and repetition that he has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of the shitpost by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of: "If these kids are shitposting at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you shitpost you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Kek

nice bait

The change to the first sentence always gets me.