>While researching for a wrap-up on the June 7 Presidential Primaries, we discovered evidence that Google may be manipulating autocomplete recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton. If true, this would mean that Google Searches aren’t objectively reflecting what the majority of Internet searches are actually looking for, possibly violating Google’s algorithm. According to a research paper cited in this video, that kind of search result manipulation has the potential to substantially influence the outcome of actual elections.
Who cares? They're a private company, they can do what they like with their product. If you don't like what they're doing, use another search engine.
Logan Evans
The fact they are private or public or alien doesn't change the fact they are jews supporting Hillary which is something people should always be aware of their scams.
Alexander Robinson
Considering they have a virtual monopoly on normie searches, it's far from "who cares", you moron.
Evan Clark
In the video the guy also says they didn't break any law but you obviously didn't watch. I'm not sure why are you complaining that someone is actually exposing jeewgle
Nathan Ortiz
Also by the end of the video they cite a study which conclusion is that autocomplete results manipulate people's decisions
This Assange is a swedish liberal wacko that didn't leak anything, he is just another jewish scam "THE LIBERATOR THE FREEDOM GUY"
Whatever he says we already know because he only says what we in the underground know for years but the media and their jewish bosses don't dare to speak
Grayson Russell
>use another search engine
>he doesn't know what scripts are
Ian Mitchell
Why is this allowed?
Adrian Ross
Are they? Private companies don't send their executives to Iran to meet with dissidents and plan subversion. They let the CIA handle that for them.
Tech companies are as much a part of the Deep State as the CIA, NSA, or any other intelligence agency.
David Jones
>its another old people don't understand technology episode The google algorithm for search suggestions is thousands of lines long and contains a lot of the research they have been doing with artificial intelligence (read some of their paper on this its actually really cool stuff). There is soo much more to what search suggestions it gives you other than the words you type in. They are based on the date, other recent popular terms, your other searches, what information you have in your cookies, etc. Conservatards must be really desperate to look like victims if they are trying to say that google hand writes suggestions that are biased
Adrian King
why wouldn't this be allowed. freedom of speech.
Dominic Watson
>cite a """"""""study"""""""" >entire research is a video of a person typing in two words into Google holy fuck lol I agree with this statement
Gavin Howard
You forgot this pic from Trump's dad who was member of the KKK.
Or is it too convenient to ignore that for you?
Jose Turner
>There is soo much more to what search suggestions it gives you other than the words you type in
That only happens in your jewish brain. What goes in the autocomplete is plain simple.
Zachary Campbell
Since when are Jews not allowed to support Clinton?
Luis Phillips
>Freedom of Speech is different than license to lie
Lying is not protected by freedom of speech
The study about suggestion bias cited in the video you retard, not the image showing in the background.
MUH LIBERALISM! MUH BLACK POWER
Matthew Thomas
Why are Canadians suck reckless faggots?
Except you Canadabro. You're apparently straight, so have some vulva to celebrate.
Noah Wood
MUH RELIGION! MUH WHITE FEELINGS!
Christian Perry
>charged with having had one too many beers >that means he's KKK
Joseph Rivera
White people and Religion > You, your family and your useless country
Jordan Richardson
cuck
Ayden Parker
...
Easton Miller
except they do exactly that.
Wyatt Cook
This is going to be bad press for Google. It's too big of a company at this point for it not to hurt it.
Ayden Wilson
Leaf > Hillbilly
Henry Lee
Why is Trump with a blackfaced woman?
Jonathan Barnes
If Hillary was canadian ... she would adopt an african baby and name the baby "Monica Lewinsky Obodango"
Jace Howard
>itsfuckingnothing.webm
Joshua Campbell
Has anyone here even read Rules for Radicals? It really is a shite book. The 13 rules are a fucking joke...
Camden Ward
>b-but you don't understand technology! You are just old to understand google algorithms
Lucas Thomas
clinton you supported the Iraq War.
You are the liberal's George W. Bush!
Austin Miller
>The 13 rules are a fucking joke >exemplification of Herbert Marcuse and Theodore Adorno's theories
Which followed ,ay result in
Jose Gray
Fuck Hillary, but this is weak.
"Indictment" and "Criminal" don't show up for ANY person searches. Look on Wiki for a list of famous indictments. None of them autocomplete.
Also, this guy has no fucking clue how a search engine works. Literally every fucking result IS GOOGLE'S OPINION. There is no "correct" answer to a search query.
Think for a sec: How will you rank pages? Alphabetically? No. By number of keywords? No, too much spam. And on and on.
Isaac Powell
I think Trump is the true shill here
Lincoln Cox
whoops crop messed up. But seriously conservatives are whiny crybabies
Hudson Johnson
>Lying is not protected by freedom of speech It literally is. You're not required to say the truth. Sometimes someone can sue you for saying false things that hurt them. Just like swinging your hands around is allowed, but if you hit someone you may be liable.
Only real limit on free speech in the US is direct incitement to violence and true threats. Posting stuff like "Tomorrow at 9.23 AM I will leave the XYZ Starbucks and shoot ABC with this gun if she doesn't back down on her immigration policy."
Jaxon Bell
>You're not required to say the truth.
If you intentionally lie and led people to believe in a lie knowing they are believing in a lie, then what happens is that the "speech" is not protected by freedom of speech and you can be sued and will most likely win if the judge is not kosher
Easton Murphy
You know germanics arent christians at all
People should stop saying germanics are christian
Juan Williams
>believe in a lie knowing they are believing in a lie
Nope. They'd have to show damages, that is, showing fraud (you lied about a product your sold or something) or libel/slander (printed or wrote something false about someone that was damaging to them).
Just going around telling lies like "The Democrats never stole anything" is totally fine.
Elijah Price
No if google advertises they offer an autocomplete search which is based on X, Y and X and you prove they manipulated the results then it's fraud and not freedom of speech
Ian Watson
They are modern protestants = liberal atheists
Cameron Thomas
This is simply and utterly false. Google can say "Autocomplete: The words most searched!" Then provide you with random results, rigged results, any result they want.
You're simply wrong if you think otherwise. You paid nothing for the product, so you'll have an exceedingly hard time convincing a judge that Google owes you damages.
John Cook
>You paid nothing for the product Heheheheheheee, good goy! Yes god goy you paid nothing. Hehehehehehehehehe!
Blake Butler
As far as the court goes, yes you paid nothing. I hate google. I hate clinton. I'd love this to be a great story and fuck them all.
The truth is there's nothing illegal here whatsoever. On top of that, it doesn't seem like they actually biased anything. Criminal and Indictment don't show up in autocomplete for anyone.
Elijah Evans
>yes you paid nothing. HHheheheheheHAHHAHAHAhahahahahehehehehehehe! You are truly our greatest ally, goy.
Carson Peterson
...
Juan Davis
>Go to Google, type "Muslims are" Yes, Google auto-complete is a pathetic attempt to brainwash.
