“Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause,” said a Google spokesperson in an email to the Washington Times.
“Claims to the contrary simply misunderstand how Autocomplete works. Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name. More generally, our autocomplete predictions are produced based on a number of factors including the popularity of search terms,” said the statement.
This video already disproved what this spokesman was fed.
Jason Smith
>Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name. they are fine with leaving "trump racist" etc in their auto complete though
Jace Ward
>Google denies manipulating search results for Hillary Clinton
i'm sure it does. pic related - try this for yourself
Ryan Martin
oy vey
Kevin Perry
>Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name.
Dylan Gonzalez
...
Owen Hughes
> Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name.
Samuel Smith
>Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction
>Jeb is a
Christian Jones
>“Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause,” said a Google spokesperson in an email to the Washington Times.
Juan Gray
distributed hate and media bias go a long way on their own. companies have been gaming search since before google existed just imagine how wonderful the clinton results would look without the loud bernie supporters pounding out articles.
Henry Thomas
...
Jackson Gomez
Holy shit
Logan Davis
...
Jacob Jenkins
>Our algorithm incorporates "several factors", namely the ones that you just debunked >We won't let it say anything bad about Hillary
Nice response Google, you really clarified the situation by saying nothing
Brandon Powell
Why the fuck would they even omit disparaging terms? If it's searched a lot, isn't there a reason for that? Barring some type of search bomb shit going on, like how miserable failure linked to George Bush's wiki for years.
Hillary Clinton could very well indeed be indicted for being a corrupt piece of shit, and Trump can't seem to avoid verbal gaffes. Both should be represented, as they are important events pertaining to those individuals. Stop whitewashing shit.
Gavin Gutierrez
Plausible deniability. The response they gave is completely predictable.
Jonathan Fisher
Jesus fucking christ
Samuel Price
...
Brayden Collins
That's pretty fucked.i fucking hate the Jews so much
Henry Harris
Tried using "Hillary Clinton tells " and it suggested "the truth", but said nothing for Trump.
Nicholas Baker
The fact that autocomplete censors what Google considers offensive is already ridiculous... You can't even type in most Red Pill things without it coming up blank and trying to feed you articles with feminist agendas.
Jonathan Morales
Just typed this in... looks like they're covering their tracks.
Adam Morris
Lies.
Jason Morgan
It is literally being changed as we speak. It's hilarious how obvious it is too. They are in full fucking panic mode. People who were doing their own testing like Sup Forums are seeing the shilled suggestions get scrubbed in front of their eyes.
Tyler Hughes
lost one of those in a tree when I was younger... it stayed up there for a while
Robert Martin
>we would never do something like discourage free speech or political opinion except they already have shown they're on board with this, already fuck over youtube channels, china censorship, etc.
Google is shit tier at this point.
Andrew Garcia
Here's a thought for you.
If they actually did that at least some right wing fag would leak it. But they don't,
So why is that. Is it because google doesn't do that or because google is completely leftist. Think carefully before you answer.
Jace Williams
the algorithm takes account of your browsing history, so if you browse and search for trump related shit alot you will get alot of trump related shit in other searches too.
Juan Perez
We gotta tweet this to the Trump people
Christopher Fisher
>If they actually did that at least some right wing fag would leak it. non sequitur
Lucas Baker
Damn, I had one of those when I was a kid. I got it stuck on my roof for a years before I finally decided to get it down.
Aiden Peterson
>If they actually did that at least some right wing fag would leak it. Lol, okay buddy
Brandon Ward
haha holy fuck. Yes they are. That one with Trump in it was one I did a few days ago
Isaac Collins
This still works at least.
Gabriel Lopez
>charlie chaplin is just 4 days older than Hitler
Very amusing.
Michael Morgan
What about this manipulation?
Gavin Cruz
I search a lot of trump related shit... OP of pic concurs with my results showing that Google is indeed covering their tracks.
Nathaniel Anderson
I'm aware of the algorithm but.. see Both were searches by me on the same desktop.
Lincoln Harris
They already explained they won't autocomplete with searches on criminal history if you use a person's full name. Try "OJ Simpson cri" or "Richard Nixon cri"
Also if you search "Hillary Clinton rac" you still get racism results.
Julian Ross
lmao, it's so obvious that they censor hillarys search. Even bing and yahoo show criminal if you enter hillary clinton cri while google does not. What a joke
Dominic Rodriguez
kicked google to curb when they started putting trends on my phone when I went opened search. I don't find (((sharyl sandberg))) inspirational and never will you fucking kikes.
All search now is shitty anyway. Switched to bing and duck duck go even though MS killed tay.
Jaxson Barnes
Try Yandex. I am unable to get an English interface tho.
Ryder Sullivan
I buried a time capsule when I was a kid. My childhood home got sold and the spot where i buried it doesn't exist any more
Julian Thompson
>san fransisco tech >right wing anything anyone right of the margin cashed out when google decided they were too white and started their own internal AA for pure diversity reasons.
"white people are" > "asians are" > "black people are" >rude "mexicans are" >rapists
Michael Perez
Only a complete fool would question which side of the political spectrum the corporate titan Google lies on by looking at a history of their homepage doodles, which are always propping up no-name "historical figures" that are always not white males, and never giving doodles to white males which were actual historic figures, unless they were complete liberal blowhards.
Nolan Cook
wtf those search results are real, wow, google is fucking rigged against trump
Nolan Carter
>Google is shilling for shillary >no we're not -t. shill (proceeds to backpedal) TRUMP BTFO, DEBUNKED, IMWITHHER, MENTALLYHILL
Joseph Evans
Did expect them saying: "Yes, we do manipulate".
Come on!
Mason Price
Except it still works
Cameron Brown
...
Levi Torres
Of course they will deny
Cameron Jackson
>donald trump is adolf hitle-- >suprised when search engine auto completes
I hate(((google))) as much as anyone but tghat example is shit
Henry Myers
Hmm, they recently adjusted the Donald Trump autocomplete so "Donald Trump racist" isn't as direct of a disparagement. They are clearly covering their tracks.
Leo Thompson
...
Robert Scott
Except that's not what I typed you daffy cunt
Kayden Anderson
based bing y r u so gud 4 porn?
Angel Jackson
I've seen this gif plenty of times, but I've never noticed the "HELP ME PLEASE" >sides have left orbit