Google denies manipulating search results for Hillary Clinton

washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/10/google-denies-burying-bad-hillary-clinton-stories/

“Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause,” said a Google spokesperson in an email to the Washington Times.

“Claims to the contrary simply misunderstand how Autocomplete works. Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name. More generally, our autocomplete predictions are produced based on a number of factors including the popularity of search terms,” said the statement.

Other urls found in this thread:

vox.com/2016/6/10/11903028/hillary-clinton-google-debunked
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

They're lying desu

This video already disproved what this spokesman was fed.

>Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name.
they are fine with leaving "trump racist" etc in their auto complete though

>Google denies manipulating search results for Hillary Clinton

i'm sure it does.
pic related - try this for yourself

oy vey

>Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name.

...

> Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name.

>Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction

>Jeb is a

>“Google Autocomplete does not favor any candidate or cause,” said a Google spokesperson in an email to the Washington Times.

distributed hate and media bias go a long way on their own. companies have been gaming search since before google existed
just imagine how wonderful the clinton results would look without the loud bernie supporters pounding out articles.

...

Holy shit

...

>Our algorithm incorporates "several factors", namely the ones that you just debunked
>We won't let it say anything bad about Hillary

Nice response Google, you really clarified the situation by saying nothing

Why the fuck would they even omit disparaging terms? If it's searched a lot, isn't there a reason for that? Barring some type of search bomb shit going on, like how miserable failure linked to George Bush's wiki for years.

Hillary Clinton could very well indeed be indicted for being a corrupt piece of shit, and Trump can't seem to avoid verbal gaffes. Both should be represented, as they are important events pertaining to those individuals. Stop whitewashing shit.

Plausible deniability. The response they gave is completely predictable.

Jesus fucking christ

...

That's pretty fucked.i fucking hate the Jews so much

Tried using "Hillary Clinton tells " and it suggested "the truth", but said nothing for Trump.

The fact that autocomplete censors what Google considers offensive is already ridiculous...
You can't even type in most Red Pill things without it coming up blank and trying to feed you articles with feminist agendas.

Just typed this in... looks like they're covering their tracks.

Lies.

It is literally being changed as we speak. It's hilarious how obvious it is too. They are in full fucking panic mode. People who were doing their own testing like Sup Forums are seeing the shilled suggestions get scrubbed in front of their eyes.

lost one of those in a tree when I was younger... it stayed up there for a while

>we would never do something like discourage free speech or political opinion
except they already have shown they're on board with this, already fuck over youtube channels, china censorship, etc.

Google is shit tier at this point.

Here's a thought for you.

If they actually did that at least some right wing fag would leak it. But they don't,

So why is that. Is it because google doesn't do that or because google is completely leftist. Think carefully before you answer.

the algorithm takes account of your browsing history, so if you browse and search for trump related shit alot you will get alot of trump related shit in other searches too.

We gotta tweet this to the Trump people

>If they actually did that at least some right wing fag would leak it.
non sequitur

Damn, I had one of those when I was a kid. I got it stuck on my roof for a years before I finally decided to get it down.

>If they actually did that at least some right wing fag would leak it.
Lol, okay buddy

haha holy fuck. Yes they are. That one with Trump in it was one I did a few days ago

This still works at least.

>charlie chaplin is just 4 days older than Hitler

Very amusing.

What about this manipulation?

I search a lot of trump related shit...
OP of pic concurs with my results showing that Google is indeed covering their tracks.

I'm aware of the algorithm but..
see
Both were searches by me on the same desktop.

They already explained they won't autocomplete with searches on criminal history if you use a person's full name. Try "OJ Simpson cri" or "Richard Nixon cri"

Also if you search "Hillary Clinton rac" you still get racism results.

lmao, it's so obvious that they censor hillarys search. Even bing and yahoo show criminal if you enter hillary clinton cri while google does not. What a joke

kicked google to curb when they started putting trends on my phone when I went opened search. I don't find (((sharyl sandberg))) inspirational and never will you fucking kikes.

All search now is shitty anyway. Switched to bing and duck duck go even though MS killed tay.

Try Yandex. I am unable to get an English interface tho.

I buried a time capsule when I was a kid. My childhood home got sold and the spot where i buried it doesn't exist any more

>san fransisco tech
>right wing anything
anyone right of the margin cashed out when google decided they were too white and started their own internal AA for pure diversity reasons.

...

vox.com/2016/6/10/11903028/hillary-clinton-google-debunked
checkmate trumpets

>they hire right wing fags
good one

...

...

Excellent meme sir. My compliments

>vox

>vox.com
shills defending the shills

whats wrong with vox?
I just found the article.

This is pretty fun actually.

"white people are"
>
"asians are"
>
"black people are"
>rude
"mexicans are"
>rapists

Only a complete fool would question which side of the political spectrum the corporate titan Google lies on by looking at a history of their homepage doodles, which are always propping up no-name "historical figures" that are always not white males, and never giving doodles to white males which were actual historic figures, unless they were complete liberal blowhards.

wtf those search results are real, wow, google is fucking rigged against trump

>Google is shilling for shillary
>no we're not -t. shill (proceeds to backpedal)
TRUMP BTFO, DEBUNKED, IMWITHHER, MENTALLYHILL

Did expect them saying: "Yes, we do manipulate".

Come on!

Except it still works

...

Of course they will deny

>donald trump is adolf hitle--
>suprised when search engine auto completes

I hate(((google))) as much as anyone but tghat example is shit

Hmm, they recently adjusted the Donald Trump autocomplete so "Donald Trump racist" isn't as direct of a disparagement.
They are clearly covering their tracks.

...

Except that's not what I typed you daffy cunt

based bing
y r u so gud 4 porn?

I've seen this gif plenty of times, but I've never noticed the "HELP ME PLEASE"
>sides have left orbit

...