Gun control works (hundreds of studies show that), the 2nd Amendment is pretty much the only obstacle in the way of reducing the gun violence
My question:
what is the point of the 2nd Amendment?
>US is already tyrannical (Patriot Act, AUMF, etc.)
>Washington himself was a tyrant (Whiskey/Shays'/Fries's Rebellions)
>Countries like Russia explicitly state that they will aid American rebels
>inb4 muh 'gun rights'
no human being is entitled to A FUCKING GUN
Other urls found in this thread:
aic.gov.au
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
baka.com.au
baka.com.au
9news.com.au
abc.net.au
theguardian.com
ssaa.org.au
abs.gov.au
reason.com
articles.chicagotribune.com
snopes.com
dailytelegraph.com.au
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
aic.gov.au
aic.gov.au
twitter.com
nice proxy.
So what are the total deaths?
Because I'd rather be shot in the heart than bashed to death with a trolley bar.
Sage
If there's violence in the country removing guns will not cease the violence, you cuck.
>no human being is entitled to A FUCKING GUN
I am.
That chart clearly shows that gun violence was already declining and the gun law proposal didn't have any effect.
That image shows that gun control didn't do shit, you moron
>Already on the decline
>I-IT WORKS I SWEAR
>Gun deaths steadily decreasing
>Continues steadily decreasing at almost the same rate after the gun law
Yeah, sort of looks like nothing happened, dipshit. Similarly our own murder rate has been dropping like a rock ever since the 80s, without gun control.
The difference is that we are still free, and Australians are not.
Supply and Demand
>Australia is in the middle of the ocean
>US is connected to countries like Mexico
>Mexican cartels would sell us guns illegally
>Source: Gunpolicy.org
Yeah nah get fucked cunt
This statistics is bullshit.
Just like in England, where guns also were banned, overall Crime rate and overall violent crime Skyrocketed after gun bans.
Not crimes by guns anymore, but tens of thousands of stabbings, knife murders etc etc.
Its a crime epidemic going on after gun ban.
Gun ban = sky rocketing total number of violent crimes.
Hey few people drink and drive, and few pedestrian die each year. And many millions die in car accidents each year, should we ban ALL cars and roads then?
the usa doesn't have a gun problem, they have a nigger problem
aic.gov.au
Why did it peak to an all time high three years after the gun law was passed?
I'd rather live free under a tyrant's rule than a slave to my fellow citizen's desires.
Thank you, Ivan. At last I truly see.
Do these include suicides?
Primary reason to own guns is so you have the option to defend yourself against the goverment and or thugs. Maybe we should ban knifes aswell since they can also be used to kill people?
Removing retards also lowers gun violence
"Gun Deaths" includes Suicide.
>gun deaths continue down at the same trend
Not even total homicides or anything, just gun deaths. And literally nothing changed.
This is what we sacrificed our freedom for?
Do you take suicides into account when making these charts?
If gun control works, why do police need them? Police lose their guns on average more.
what works in one country might not work in another not to mention the amount of fucking guns that would need to be confiscated in countries with the right to bear arms
hundreds of studies show the violent crime rate stays exactly the same. Fuck off with your "gun deaths" weasel word bullshit.
right? the government shouldnt treat the population like children BUT its been proven that you fucking people cant be trusted with guns without killing children, students, movie goers etc
Have they ever fixed the shitty lever-action with the AD110s? I finger fucked one and good God, it was stiff and felt like there were gravels in there. It was a consistent grinding so I think it's a machining quality control issue rather than particles stuck in the action.
Instantly put me off the things.
>no human being is entitled to A FUCKING GUN
we still have to pay for them, silly.
>no human being is entitled to A FUCKING GUN
Except for you of course - you feel entitled to dictate that people you don't like be unarmed while your favoured groups will of course be armed. I've never come across anyone who was genuinely in favour of banning guns - which would of course require disbanding the military and disarming police - but there are plenty of people who want to disarm their opponents while their faction (inc their state or any other favoured groups) remain armed of course.
It is an essential human right to be able to bear arms.
If it were not for weapons, Modern Civilisation would not exist.
Only certain types of Weapons that could be used for decimation should be banned or at least monitored.
> SHALL NOT INFRINGE
...
...
>I am.
Your are also entitled to a bullet you little shit.
so are there more assaults in winter or summer?
I'd say there are more in spring, due to hormones.
So the downward trend of gun deaths continued after the gun ban, but not at a particularly accelerated rate?
Great job you proxy faggot
Gun control -MIGHT- help stop mass shootings, but it does not do shit to stop homicides or general criminality
Good
It's a bit stiff out of the box, but after running 100+ through the action smooths out considerably.
but it was already decreasing you fucking idiot
And the police and military...own guns. Are you implying that they are not human? There is no reason for governments to own weapons. They invariably use them for plunder and murder.
crocodile dundee is still alive
You don't understand what those statistics are showing.
They show that gun deaths were declining BEFORE the laws were changed and that gun deaths continued to decrease at THE EXACT SAME RATE since before the ban. It continued along the same trend line.
Meanwhile, rapes, robberies, assault and home invasions rise.
It might reduce the deaths though. And accidental injuries. And women killed by their partners instead of being beaten.
No it doesn't.
And where do we have 200 gun deaths a year?
inb4 and after bunch of white trash faggots think they can defeat a "tryannical government" with a glock 9 LOL
So therefore, a good thing. Can't you see that?
1/2
Our ex prime minister john howard got on your tv last night to LIE to your nation that gun control worked down under.
I am here to give you the real facts and dispute every single one of his lies with cited sources. Your job is then to save all these facts and BTFO anyone who tries to lie that aussie gun control worked. You will prevent the tragedy that happened to us happening in your nation and perhaps even redpill a few of my own countrymen as to the lies we've been fed.
>John howard claimed we have not had a mass shooting since port arthur
We have had FOUR since.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
The hunt family murders
baka.com.au
The recent sydney seige
baka.com.au
Now time for some bonus points. Last week in victoria we've had 15 shootings, source below. We also had ANOTHER seige in sydney in the last week.
9news.com.au
abc.net.au
This is the first lie they push about our country. That the violence stopped. It did not stop, it has been brutally supressed due to gag and control orders on our media.
theguardian.com
I find it amusing that people who want to ban guns thinking it will reduce gun crime.
Especially when they point to Australia as being a "gun control success story".
Australia is having an increase in crime, and has had one since the gun ban in 1997. Gun crime HAS gone down, yet what anti-gunners will not tell you is that it was dropping BEFORE the ban.
Link: ssaa.org.au
abs.gov.au
reason.com
articles.chicagotribune.com
snopes.com
Did you know: one in ten of all guns seized by police from criminals in Australia is a DIY submachine gun?
Here are some articles showing the major failures of Australia's "tough" gun laws you won't see on TV-
I found these in less than 10 minutes:
dailytelegraph.com.au
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
thefirearmblog.com
The gun deaths rate was declining regardless of the law. The law had no effect.
As you can see here:
>Assault rose
aic.gov.au
>Sexual assault rose for 5-6 years following, before dropping off. Kidnapping also rose.
aic.gov.au
The only gun control needed is to remove gun rights from virgins and those with autism and officially diagnosed mental illness. Once you have been diagnosed. Boom govt gets all your guns while you are in the loony bin.
R9k gets denied its shooting. And normal people get to keep guns
No. It means that gun laws had no positive effect.
Doesn't matter what the point is.
It is explicitly stated in the Constitution that the people have a right to bear arms
Trying to logically argue why or why not we should have guns is utterly pointless
The constitution is just a a shitty peice of paper should be burned desu
...gun violence was already trending downwards, and it actually stopped trending downwards many years AFTER the proposal.
additional if you look at the assault rate, it jumped ~45% over 10 years afterwards. it had the exact opposite effect. suicide increased as well, though i cant remember the exact figures off the top of my head. robbery actually spiked by over 50% cumulative in the following 5 years before it finally reached prior levels, and it had no significant effect on other crimes. you're wrong
src: AIC
Scenario: A criminal breaks into a house and encounters the resident. The criminal is a 6'3" 95kg male who decides he'd have a better chance of getting away with the crime if there are no living witnesses.
We will run this scenario with three different residents:
1) A healthy 6 foot tall 80kg man who works out regularly.
2) A healthy 5'4" tall 55kg woman.
3) A 6'3" 95kg 28 year old male war veteran with a dislocated arm and broken foot.
For this first set of results, we will assume gun control is 100% effective, and the criminal is armed with a knife or baseball bat.
Scenario 1:
The resident puts up a fight, but is overpowered by the criminal who has more experience in violence and is bigger and stronger. The criminal is injured and eventually caught as a result of these injuries, but the resident is still dead.
Scenario 2:
The woman is very easily overpowered by the larger, stronger criminal. She is raped and killed by the criminal, but the DNA the criminal left inside her leads to his eventual conviction. Still no comfort to the dead resident.
Scenario 3:
The war veteran would normally have been able to easily deal with the criminal, but due to his injuries is unable to fight back effectively and is easily killed. The criminal is never caught.
For this next set of results, let's assume (more reasonably) that the criminal, being a criminal, has access to illegal guns. The residents, being law abiding citizens, do not have access to firearms.
Scenarios 1, 2, and 3:
The criminal shoots the resident dead. Whether he is caught or not is of no comfort to the resident, since they are dead.
For the final set of results, we will assume that gun control is not as strict (or non-existent).
Scenarios 1, 2, and 3:
A shootout between the criminal and the resident occurs. The resident has the advantage of knowing their home ground and is easily able to either scare the criminal off, or incapacitate or kill the criminal. The resident lives.
Fuck gun grabbers.
Having a supreme document detailing the immutable rights the citizenry has seems to be preferable over not having one.
Of course we can. We need to kill supporters of the tyrannical government. If you knew anything about guerilla warfare, you would know that you do NOT fight soldiers and police. You avoid them. You kill their wives and children while they are out fighting. You hunt down and kill liberal professors and teachers. You blow up roads and power plants. Kill government supporters, and attack their supply chains. The strategy that poorly armed rebels have used to overthrow mighty empires time after time. Make the government stretch its resources to cover potential victim groups, roads, power plants, bridges, etc, and they will be to thinly spread to effectively counter attacks by groups of insurgents. A civil war needs to be waged against the civilian supporters of the government.
now show me total murder rate instead of limiting it to guns.
Every sentient being has a biological imperative to protect itself. Some animals have sharp teeth, some have horns, others have claws, still others have venom filled stingers.
Human beings don't have any of those evolutionary adaptations. Instead we have an evolved brain. With that brain we invented tools. If a rival human wishes to do one harm and the tool they are using is a blade, then one must defend oneself with a tool as well. Personally, I would want a more powerful tool in the form of a gun.
I am proud of being a cuck
Myth: Gun control in Australia is curbing crime
Fact:
Crime has been rising since enacting a sweeping ban on private gun ownership. In
the first two years after Australian gun-owners were forced to surrender 640,381 personal
firearms, government statistics showed a dramatic increase in criminal activity.
In 2001-2002, homicides were up another 20%.
From the inception of firearm confiscation to March 27, 2000, the numbers are:
•
Firearm
-related murders were up 19%
•
Armed robberies were up 69%
•
Home invasions were up 21%
The sad part is that in the 15 years before the national gun confiscation:
•
Firearm-related homicides dropped nearly 66%
•
Firearm-related deaths fell 50%
>gun deaths
>include suicides
IT WAS A MUSLIM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
GET BLOWN OUT YOU SOGGY CHEERIO LIBKEKS
To be fair. Legal guns owners are the ones who deserve to die. While criminals just want to survive
It was unfair to let legal people own guns
Gun control doesn't work
Just take a look at Mexico, there's only one store that sells weapons and you need a shitload of paperwork and permissions to even own a shitty caliber
Meanwhile, people who doesn't give a damn about gun control(narcos and the likes) have complete military arsenals at home
>Gun control works (hundreds of studies show that)
Try citing them then
>no human being is entitled to A FUCKING GUN
We literally are in America
You'll be selling our criminals guns if gun control ever gets through.
suicides don't count as gun violence but people include them anyway. people will find a way to kill themselves, gun or no, but they for some reason are still counted inthese reports.
you are delusional you faggot, you would get steamrolled
How so??
Same way you guys sell us heroin, cocaine, and marijuana.
Oh I get it, you are talking about criminals!
I'm not one of those, pendejo.
Yeah, it does actually. You clearly know nothing about statistics. The graph shows a downward trend before 1996, so it cannot be said that the legislation enacted in that year was statistically significant.
I was using "you" to refer to your nation. Not to you individually. Mistakes were made.
Because gun control has stopped people from being shot 200m from the Kremlin, right? Or even gun violence in general?
SHALL
>"you'll be selling our criminals guns"
You should've change that "you'll" for "your criminals"
I knew what you mean since the beginning, I'm just being a dick
BE
Don't be such a dick then. Jeez.
shoo shoo
shall not be infringed
>1 post
What did he mean by this?
Hyrule is proof gun control doesn't work. If Zelda or her bodyguards were allowed to carry, Ganondorf would have been BTFO the moment he tried anything.
This russian IP shill is putting in work right now. Look for his anti-Trump threads as well.
I don't know where they get their data from in that image - but other sources have gun related crime reletivley unchanged since the buyback. The problem with said data, is that Lefties shoehorn the discussion and focus only on 'mass-shootings', to which we don't have many of. Gun crime in itself though, hasn't really changed
IIRC we only had two bad ones in the past before 96 anyway. And one after 96 but that totally doesn't count according to gun grabbers.
The rebellion is very close brother. We will show you why we have a second amendment within the next 5 years.
Thank you.
Everyone seems to forget that crime rates in Australia are pretty low and also that the Australian border is a fucking ocean so its pretty hard for criminals to smuggle guns.
It's actually quite easy. An example is they use pottery stores as a front and import them hidden inside sculptures.
We also have the most enthusiastic border guards in the world.
Why even bother smuggling when we have thousands of square kilometers of isolated bushland where you can manufacture them yourself completely undisturbed? Bikies don't fucking buy guns. They make them and sell them.
who gets guns without bullets?
Now show overall deaths by violent crime and how they were affected by the ban of guns.
So gun deaths were declining before the law and continued to do so after therefore gun laws work?
This this this this
You have to poop
You go to the bathroom and start pooping
While pooping, the government slips a paper under the door that says you are obligated to poop at the time you are pooping.
From this we can garner the government helped you poop and you wouldn't have pooped without it. You're welcome.
>Russia
>Talking about gun control
>Has a worse murder rate than the US
>4 mass shooting since
3 aren't considered mass shootings
>baka.com.au
>t-they don't count
>not enough v-victims
How very morbid of you.