Hinduism is the closest major religion to the ethnic religion of the Indo-Europeans

>Hinduism is the closest major religion to the ethnic religion of the Indo-Europeans
>the Indo-Europeans introduced it to India and used it to ingrain their superiority over the natives into every aspect of Indian culture
>Indians literally believe in a religion that tells them they're inferior to their conquerors
>they can't even stop being second class citizens by joining that religion like in Islam
Are Indians the most pathetic race in the world?

Other urls found in this thread:

ancientvedas.com/chapter/9/book/73/
ancientvedas.com/chapter/9/book/41/
academia.edu/7741340/No_Racism_in_Rigveda
sunlightcooking.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/world_beam_8100_1_687x3431.jpg
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Profs??

Yeah and now the north actual aryan parts of india became islamic and lately sikh

How can Indians worship these gods, they're ugly as fuck to be honest.

they are pretty cute desu

Is this the dumb american ignorance at work?
Only one meme arrow is somewhat true and that only maybe halfway at max.

>Hinduism is the closest major religion to the ethnic religion of the Indo-Europeans
What the fuck does this even mean? How could you possibly feel qualified to say something like this?

How could he not be?
It's the ONLY major religion which has anything to do with the original steppenigger horseburial shit.

>Hinduism
No such thing as Hinduism actually exists
There are 3 main sets of indic religions- vedic, post vedic brahminic and post brahminic cults.

Modern day "hinduism" comes under the post brahminic cults, though there are some (partially failed) movements to reform and go back to brahminic and vedic religions but they have been largely unsuccessful.

The only indic religion which was similar to the Indo-European ones died out like 1700 years ago at least.

These pictures started to be made and distributed commecrially in holy books and stuff during the time and after french revolution, with brits bringing their art into india it with angels and jesus in them, which was enhanced by printing technology. Before that only statues and carvings in temples were common, which looked nothing like these. But in temples made in modern times (meaning during and after departure of brits) the statues have these abomination like look in them, mostly due to the influence of the print works.

Hinduism has some crazy shits, a bit like Greek and Norse paganism. A bunch of gods going around spit out magic stuffs.

>>Indians literally believe in a religion that tells them they're inferior to their conquerors

THIS


- Rig Veda 1.130.8
"Indra in battles help his Aryan worshipper, he who hath hundred helps at hand in every fray, in frays that win the light of heaven. Plaguing the lawless he gave up to Manu's seed the DUSKY SKIN"

- Rig Veda 9.41.1
"Active and bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, Driving the BLACK SKIN far away."

-Rig Veda 9.73.5
"O'er Sire and Mother they have roared in unison bright with the verse of praise, burning up riteless men, Blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the SWARTHY SKIN which Indra hates."

Can you cite where you got this from?
Never read anything like this when I read it. Looks mostly like stormfront gibberish.

Prolly censored by brahmins and vedic kshatriyas later on so that their subservients don't find fishy stuff in the religious texts

"Aryan" (/ˈɛəriən,ˈɛərjən,ˈær-/)[1]or Arya is a term meaning "noble" which was used as a self-designation byIndo-Iranian people. The word was used by theIndic peopleof theVedic periodin India as an ethnic label for themselves, and to refer to the noble class as well as the geographic region known asĀryāvarta, whereIndo-Aryanculture was based.[2][3]The closely relatedIranian peoplealso used the term as an ethnic label for themselves in theAvestascriptures, and the word forms theetymologicalsource of the country nameIran.[4][5][6][7]It was believed in the 19th century that Aryan was also a self-designation used by allProto-Indo-Europeans, a theory that has now been abandoned.[8]Scholars point out that, even in ancient times, the idea of being an "Aryan" was religious, cultural and linguistic, not racial.[9][10][11]

Drawing on misinterpreted references in theRig Vedaby Western scholars in the 19th century, the term "Aryan" was adopted as aracial categorythrough the works ofArthur de Gobineau, whose ideology of race was based on an idea of blonde northern European "Aryans" who had migrated across the world and founded all major civilizations, before being degraded throughracial mixingwith local populations. Through the works ofHouston Stewart Chamberlain, Gobineau's ideas later influenced theNazi racial ideologywhich saw "Aryan peoples" as innately superior to other putative racial groups.[12]The atrocities committed in the name of this racial ideology caused the use of the term "Aryan" to be abandoned by most academics; and, in present-dayacademia, its usage has in most cases been replaced by the use of the terms "Indo-Iranian" and "Aryan" is now mostly limited to its use as the term for the "Indo-Aryan languages".[13]

t. wikipedia

lmao

" Blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the SWARTHY SKIN which Indra hates."

From

ancientvedas.com/chapter/9/book/73/

"Active and bright have they come forth, impetuous in speed like bulls, Driving the BLACK SKIN far away."

From

ancientvedas.com/chapter/9/book/41/

This was meant for you

All of the non racial claims are largely based on modern political correctness.

However it would also be incorrect to say that aryans were literally "white' Europeans, since the once "white" indo-europeans in the asian region east of Iran were tocharians. The arians would most likely have been olive skinned (like practically almost all people who live around the sunny regions of the world), or at least eventually adapted to have more melanin pigmentation to cope with the regional situations.

and they worship butter and toilets

But it cannot denied that the european scholars who studied indian mythology had huge european biases in their works which showed in their translations, like blowing words out of proportion to completely change their meaning, taking metaphors literally, like the french guy above stating Arthur de Gobineau who gave the first translations of Rig Veda. Max Muller has wrote extensively on this if you dont like indian scholars. And by no means was Max Muller "politically correct". That didnt even exist back then.

How sunny do you think the Ural mountains are?

read
and
academia.edu/7741340/No_Racism_in_Rigveda

Not as much as India or Iran
sunlightcooking.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/world_beam_8100_1_687x3431.jpg

True there were biases, hence why some literally thought that they were the descendants of the ancient aryans themselves.
As for Muller- the guy who plagiarized the work of another German scholar, clearly let Romanticization affect his view and clearly has strong (at times even anti biological) biases in his arguments. Also, his whole statement of "the blackest Hindus represent an earlier stage of Aryan speech and thought than the fairest Scandinavians"- is inaccurate as the blacker hindus are dravidians, who belong to a a completely different linguistic group than the indo-european languages (though there have been exchanges of words with actual indo european languages and dravidian ones in the last 2000 years, that doesnt negate the fact that dravidian languages are completely separate from indo european ones).

In the end, the ancient aryans were neither "white" nor like a majority of modern day Indians, they would be like the minority of modern day Indians (and a minority of Iranians) who have a large amount of vedic upper social order ancestry, simple as that.

I don't understand how people square this mystic racial higgeldy-piggeldy with the demonstrable fact that southern India is more developed than the north.