Is this worth a watch or should I just rewatch Silence of the lambs?
Is this worth a watch or should I just rewatch Silence of the lambs?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
You should watch Manhunter, nigger
Yes it's gorgeous.
K, is it related to hannibal/silence?
it's very good
personally, i hated it
just watched it yesterday. Its great, has some dumb parts. Ray Liota is riot in this.
it's OK but nothing special, dumb fun at best
hopkins is great in it, oldman is pretty good too, moore is meh
i'd go with "just rewatch Silence of the lambs", personally
that film never gets old
it's the first film featuring hannibal lecter. IIRC red dragon was pretty much a remake of manhunter.
hopkins isn't in it though, the character is played by another guy.
silence of the lambs is trash
overrated
also has an insufferably invasive score/ OST
God Hannibal isnt even fucking worth it.
Watch Silence of the Lambs, Red Dragon, and Manhunter. You gain nothing by watching Hannibal
>rewatch Silence of the lambs
Filmstruck has the commentary, which is v comfy
>You gain nothing by watching Hannibal
nothing except for solid, classy entertainment
there's a scene where clarice is just standing around in the ghetto trying to be incognito and none of the negros even notice her
You're a faggot and I don't like you.
red dragon was really dry and unexciting though
hannibal is dumb, but at least it's entertainingly dumb
>God tier
The Silence of the Lambs
>Great tier
Manhunter
>Good tier
Red Dragon
>Decent tier
Hannibal (film)
>Shit tier
Hannibal Rising
Hannibal is worth one watch but that's it.
I see. Thanks.
No.
SotL is the only great movie of the bunch with Manhunter very close.
iwasjustpretendingtoberetarded.png
Hannibal was better than Red Dragon, are you high?
My ex gf and I loved SOTL and we tried watching this one once. Holy shit, what a fucking let down. Part of why SOTL was great because it was a creepy slow burn. As soon as you start Hannibal and five minutes in there's an explosion and gunfight, you know Scott missed the point completely
Wow.
You're meant for each other. You won't find a person with such a bad taste in movies like you, user. Congratulations.
The fucking meme pig movie with a different clarice was better than Ed Norton and Ralph Fiennes?
Are you outta your fucking mind?
you and your ''''gf'''' are dumb faggots
the entire movie had one shootout at the start that functioned to put clarice's character under a lot tension, nothing more
not to mention that it was taken directly from the book
if you want some laffs watch the siskel and ebert review of silence
siskel is so contrarian during it,i think he was /ourguy/
because he disliked hannibal or that he liked silence?
buffalo bill had a 10/10 taste in music
A typical Ridley Scott film. The visuals are pretty good, but the script is nothing to write home about. Read the book instead. The ending is so much better
Mads > Anthony Hopkins
i liked how overt hopkins hannibal was but mad's feels more grounded.
what was manhunters hannibal like?
He's kinda an indirect asshole
Delightful, it's Brian Cox.
>what was manhunters hannibal like?
average
how are they different?
>Name is Hannibal
>Is a Cannibal
WOW
D E E P E S T L O R E
whoa i just got that
I never understood the hate againts it
the books ends with Hannibal hypnotising Clarice and she basically becomes his slave. They go to the opera together and live their life as a happily married couple
>risks his cozy italian life to contact Clarice
>goes to murricah for her
>gets caught by crazy billionaire because of it
>chops off his hand for her
Why did Ridley turn him into a cuck? In b4: the book. It does it even worse