What did he mean by this?

What did he mean by this?
youtu.be/BfxlgHBaxEU

Other urls found in this thread:

pages.citebite.com/n1r2l0s7w6abj
twitter.com/AnonBabble

he's an old fuck

I'm just so confused as to whose idea it was to show this kind of thing to Miyazaki, who is famous for creating deeply human and empathetic works. I mean, his animation is so much about capturing a sense of wonder and beauty, imbuing each frame with emotion (which is what catapulted him above the rest of the industry). If you've seen any of his works, there's so much thought put into each scene, as you'd see with any master filmmaker. That's why he dislikes a lot of anime, which I definitely agree with - as someone who's watched a shitton of anime, the majority of it is mediocre and commercialized. The animation itself is shallow and gives little thought to reflecting reality. I doubt he has a problem with the stuff coming from Mamoru Hosoda or Makoto Shinkai.

I could see this technology in its current form used in a commercial horror game, but even if it was developed further... yeah, this kind of demonstration would still be pretty insulting. This machine is incapable of empathy or any emotional thought. Because of that, it's not going to achieve the artistry that Miyazaki views as essential to animation. (A viewpoint often twisted into "curmudgeonly old man doesn't like tech!!" because people get defensive about him disapproving of their anime).

But overall, this just was not the appropriate audience. It's like showing a famous painter a bad painting you generated from algorithms. Damn, that was so uncomfortable to watch.

What I take away from this is that Hayao Miyazaki was unable to mentally separate the example in front of him from the potential of the software.

Using machine learning to predict the movement of a zombie was admittedly not the best starting point but if they'd applied it to a fluffy ball with cute little arms and had it going through the stages before it's walking along nicely he probably would have been able to see the value in it.

it's a reasonable idea, which was poorly presented to a person who was unable to see its potential.

They made a huge error talking about the application in horror.

When they mentioned it was using its head to move, they should have related it to the child-like intelligence that it's using trying to learn how a human would move, and that because it didn't understand pain, it couldn't know that the head isn't used like that.

And they sure as shit should've had something to show him at a later stage.

>What did he mean by this?
That you are a triggered little faggot, fuck you.

Why are you so mean? What's wrong user, wanna talk about it?

Why do the comments in this thread sound like a fucking reddit discussion?

Because you spend to much time on reddit?

Don't you ever fucking reply to me again.

Miyazaki's argumentation says more about him than about the technology or the tech guy

The Pikachu voice of the announcer says the most of all about the current state of Japanese society.

>people not rampantly shitposting for once
>dude reddit lmao xD

Yes, it does.

It shows he actually understands the value of insight into the human condition, and the full spectrum of what that encompasses - pain, suffering, love, joy, sadness, and everything in between - to inform creative decision-making. His example of having observed the remarkable willpower in the face of adversity of a disabled friend and internalised that to inform his paradigmatic choices in creating art highlights the fundamental issue of expecting an unthinking, unfeeling machine running a fairly low-level procedural algorithm to produce anything of resonant emotional value.

He's projecting his own insecurities over a non-human process. A non-human thing isn't dehumanizing by itself, if you saw a leaf being pushed by the wind and i reminded you of your disabled friend you wouldn't say it's dehumanizing.
And the fact that he becomes disgusted by the presentation acknowledges that the algorithm can produce a resonant emotional value.

>*it reminded you of

>A non-human process
>Having any place in art

Back to your spreadsheet, accounts-boy.

Get on with the 20th century, gramps

>exploitation is not only found in communism, capitalism is a system just like that. I believe a company is common property of the people that work there. But that is a socialistic idea. Nowadays, American style capitalism has become mainstream. The stock holders have voices and change managers to get more profit in the current term. In addition to that, they downsize or restructure regular employees and enlarge temporary workers and part time workers. For them, temporary workers are just disposable. On the other hand, regular employees also are completely exhausted in hard work. Such a system is quite Animal Farm like.
>Its scheme used to be common sense to the world. Now, everyone has forgotten about that. Everyone assumes he or she is in middle-class and blinded by the mechanism of exploitation.
pages.citebite.com/n1r2l0s7w6abj

>comments are literally copypasted from the reddit thread

Back you go.

>His example of having observed the remarkable willpower in the face of adversity of a disabled friend and internalised that to inform his paradigmatic choices in creating art highlights the fundamental issue of expecting an unthinking, unfeeling machine running a fairly low-level procedural algorithm to produce anything of resonant emotional value.

That has nothing to do with what he was talking about. He was literally offended because the animation made him think of disabled people. He's a retard and so are you.

>a non-human process
>literally created by humans

regardless, you take your little japanese cartoons a little too seriously friend

Fucking rekt
Miyazaki shuttin' niggaz like a pro.
I could watch vids of Miyazak lyrically murqin' daft niggaz all day.

Why is he watching some weird AI simulation?
Why is he triggered by this AI simulation?

DUDE RITTRE JAP PEE PEES RMAO
DUDE AI SIMURATE BIG BRACK DONG RMAO