Shitlibs are pushing for no ar-15's in the hands of civilians

Shitlibs are pushing for no ar-15's in the hands of civilians
Counter sign on this one:
petitions.whitehouse.gov//petition/disregard-petition-ban-ar-15

Other urls found in this thread:

fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_8_murder_victims_by_weapon_2009-2013.xls
freebeacon.com/issues/australia-sees-spike-in-gun-crime-despite-outright-ban/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>ban the AR-15!
>terrorist attack happens with an SKS
>ban the SKS!
>terrorist attack happens with an MP44
>ban the Nazi weapons!

Does an AR-15 really offer so much of an advantage over any other semi-automatic rifle with a 30 round magazine that the AR-15 specifically needs to be banned, or is this just because its been prominent in the last few shootings?

I signed the real one.

Honestly, they need to think they have overwhelming support so they pull some serious shit so we can stomp their faces in on this issue once and for all.

I'm sick of them trying to subvert the 2nd amendment piece by piece. We need them to overplay their hand and loose hard.

It's scurry.

Just an excuse to ban another gun.

>two terror attacks in two days in france with knives
>no call for a knife ban

Really makes you think...

its hilarious how clueless they are that they have to cling to one specific firearm because its whats the media always says is the worst

nvm that there are hundreds of other firearms that are literally the exact same thing in function

braindead social media age "progressives"

they support the ban on guns, because they can't admit it's the Muslims.

Notice how you never hear any libcuck say the following:
>Ban FN FALs, Ban M14s! Ban HK G3s! Ban Steyr AUGs! Ban FAMAS! Ban Tavors! Ban SCARs! Ban AKs! Ban G36! Ban Galils!

It just shows how fucking pathetic libcucks are. They know absolutely fuck-all about firearms and just latch onto "AR-15" because it has basically become a fucking buzzword at this point.

It's like when any random rifle is called an "AK-47" by some dumb fuck who thinks all rifles are exactly the same.

>terrorist attack happens with an M-14
>ban AR-15's, AKs, and handguns
t. our government in the 90's

>libshits ban ARs
>I still have my FAL

thank god for these brave liberals...now everyone can just use H&Ks...dog bless amurga

They should ban Galils, those things jam like NYC traffic.
But the push to ban a singular weapon is a litmus test to apply to all eventually.
It's not feasibly possible to make all assault weapons simply disappear.
The UK were spot welding Sten sub machine guns in back yards.
The move to ban weapons is about 140 years too late.
Anyone with basic machinist skills can make a fully automatic weapon out of metal blanks, and ammunition is plentiful.
This is a pipe dream that goes nowhere.

Easy get terrorist pressure cookers and improvised weapons in a gun free zone. Also that have to beat out the all time high shooting score.

Libtards- Make America Cuck Again

>Ban AR-15
>buy AR-10 instead

EVERYONE GET IN HERE

No it's just the cheapest and most widely available while also looking moderately not shitty. It's pretty much the only reason

but the ar-10 is only 2/3 of an ar-15

It's because it's scary looking, basically.

If you go back and look at the text of the assault weapons ban from the 1990s, you can see the liberal mind at work. They didn't ban guns based on their function. They banned guns based on their appearance.

the ar-1 is just a 22mm round with a claw hammer and a nail

I was about to make a thread on this very issue.

I'm supporting all nogunz initiatives proposed until they come and start confiscating them.

Fuck this retarded magic genie mafia shit.

>mfw they dare to unironically tread on American soil as a redcoat coward and expect not to get a brain implant in proper 1776 fashion.

Let's have this argument.
How many citizens are killed by "assault rifles" per year? Let's see.

fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_8_murder_victims_by_weapon_2009-2013.xls

Rifle Homicides:
2009 - 351
2010 - 367
2011 - 332
2012 - 298
2013 - 285

Knives or Cutting Instrument Homicides:
2009 - 1,836
2010 - 1,732
2011 - 1,716
2012 - 1,604
2013 - 1,490

Blunt Objects (Hammers and Club) Homicides:
2009 - 623
2010 - 549
2011 - 502
2012 - 522
2013 - 428

Personal Weapon (Hands, Feet) Homicides:
2009 - 817
2010 - 769
2011 - 751
2012 - 707
2013 - 687

*CLEARLY* the data shows that "assault rifles" are a serious problem for Americans, correct? By their standards, knives, hammers, and feet should be banned even more promptly?

What about CAR-15s?

Except according to these liberals, reading is hard

...

...

Someone less lazy than me should make this into an easy-to-digest infographic. Would allow you to rapidly and overwhelmingly blow Bolshie gun grabbers the fuck out.

SIGNED it and am giving to friends

In other words, 99.9% of firearms are NOT used in homicides?

#NotAllAR15s

>300 people per year are killled with rifles in the usa

wow its fucking nothing

>Counter sign on this one:
na, I agree with the libs on this one.

Faggot

The second American Enlightenment is right around the corner son, and you're a redcoat.

You have to go back.

Considering the US population is 318.9 million?

Absolutely nothing

do you know where you are?

Here

...

Its just the most common and the cheapest because it is American

Daily reminder: It wasn't an Ar15.

...

...

The thing with the AR-15 is the MASSIVE market behind the gun.

If you ban the AR-15 they will be in fact killing so many gun manufacturers and gun accessories companies in a single blow.

It is literally like killing Android.

You would still have both.

Also what's with the lag in posts. Or posts disappearing?

...

How about one for the government to subsidize civilian ownership of AR-15s?

We appear to be under spam attacks.

How can you say that gun restrictions don't work when in the 20 years since the National Firearms Agreement was introduced in Australia, we haven't had a single mass shooting and gun crime has declined?

Paris, France had tougher restrictions. Not that it made any difference.

freebeacon.com/issues/australia-sees-spike-in-gun-crime-despite-outright-ban/

Australia Sees Spike in Gun Crime Despite Outright Ban