ITT: Movies with low tomatometers but high audience scores

...

...

that was shit

ITT: Proof that critics are right and audiences are morons.

the audience disagrees you critic

ITT: Movies for fucking retards

faggot

Hard mode : higher audience score than tomatometer and the audience is right.

you go first

Man on Fire is kino.

...

...

solid find

I thought it was kinda cool.

>that critic summary
What a fucking pleb, goddamn. 10/10 movie, not debatable.

Autismkino 2016

Fuck this audience person

fuck, i guess i have some autism?, i liked it.

No, user, the protagonist has autism.

Little Nicky is a movie for retards but I can't help but love it.

It's one of my favourite shitty movies.

what the fuck did people think is so fundamentally wrong with Die Hard 3?

the plot works, there's a twist, buddy cop, decent villain that the good guys play catch-up with, multiple city locations, car chases, a boat, comedy, violence.

the fuck??

Vce Vursa is more interesting

>That critic consensus
Sounds good desu

FUCK, this just shook things up

>plebs can't understand spy kino
Understandable. Spy Kids is only accessible to those with brains of the highest caliber. Bravo, Robert!

Buddy cop movies were kind of dying by then. It was a tired formula at that point.

Yeah, the character arc of The Guy in 3 was masterfully done.

This will trigger all of Sup Forums

Kung-Reddit is shit, deal with it.

YOU WANT FRIES WITH THAT?

I'm going to badong you

But anyone who likes the movie without realizing that also has autism.

>People
Everyone I know thinks 3 is a classic, not quite as good as 1, better then 2 and all the rest.

Critics are pretentious.

now this is a truly stinking pile of shit movie

This will always piss me off. Fucking critics must have been on meth

No, critics then were made to see every low quality buddy cop movie for the previous 13 years and tired of it. In it's own bubble Die Hard 3 is great but I can totally see someone being sick of the genre by then

The first Die Hard is the only good one.