Why the fuck were the early 2000s so terribly bad for music? What happened?

Why the fuck were the early 2000s so terribly bad for music? What happened?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

They werent.

i blame 9/11

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996

...

You probably think today's music is good.

This is pretty spot on, within the context of popular music

> "today's music"
> implying there aren't any good artists anymore
> not listening to music unavailable in the pop microcosm

Yes, for killing the momentum of decent music like nu metal and giving rise to sensitive indie horsehit like the Strokes

muh Nu Metal tho

literally a modern classic

wut? the period of bad music starts in 2005 and ends in 2011

Why?

>the period of bad music starts in 2005 and never ends
agreed

What, in that period happened magical things that might never ever happen again. Its like a portal opened.

bon iver - for emma, forever ago
janelle monae - archandroid
erykah badu - new amerykah pt.1
james blake first 3 projects
graduation and 808s and heartbreak

2000s was a great decade for electronic

There wasn't anything wrong with the early 2000s, you're just not looking hard enough

Nu-metal would have died around 2005 anyways, 9/11 just sped it up.
People were getting tired of it around that time.

Korn's Untouchables in 2002 was the last decent nu-metal album.

nu metal was better than trustfund indieh muh postpunk revival, which is amongst the most derivative and dull music ever devised

>2000 is literally the year kid a and lysf came out

muh white dudes with guitars amirite?

no, it's 1999-2008

Boy In Da Corner, one of the greatest albums of all time was released in 2003.