Why doesn't soccer change the point system so the winner gets 2 points, a draw gets you nothing and a loss gets you -1?

Why doesn't soccer change the point system so the winner gets 2 points, a draw gets you nothing and a loss gets you -1?

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=oa4jGB-8si4
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

That would literally change nothing, the gaps between the points would stay the same.

This...

Shit, I meant 3 points for a win.

at least you tried

m.youtube.com/watch?v=oa4jGB-8si4

I HEAR YOUR HEART BEAT TO THE BEAT OF THE DRUMS
OH WHAT A SHAME THAT YOU CAME HERE WITH SOMEONE

New Zealanders truly are the link between apes and humans

Aussie in control of math

Would not be different from now. Plus some really bad teams would end up at negative at the end of the season.

Why are draws even a possibility. Every game should have a winner. Cuck sport

>win: 24 points
>draw: 8 points
>lose: 0 points
>suddenly every amerishart watches soccer "wow those are big numbers it's so entertaining now"

Make a goal 5 points, a post hit 2 and 1 point for punting it over the goal :#)

What about a dodecahedron as a ball?

also add timeouts

they should make 0-0 draws worth 0 points

No, it wouldn't, you retarded fuck.

no.Football is like islam. either you accept it or we chop your head off.

multiball already

soccer players really should wear Spandex or at least something that gives a proper outline of their ass and pelvic area

Potato famine in charge of math

It's literally the same thing you retard. You get 2 less points for a draw and 3 less for a loss.

>"sports fans" on an imageboard being retarded
Fucking surprise.

Listen, dumbfucks.
>start of season
>lose first 3 matches
>team is now on -3 points

A team that drew their 1st 3 games would be 6 points ahead of you. How the fuck is that the same as the current format, you retarded faggots?

No you fucking idiot. You're forgetting about away goals. Jesus you cunts are dumb.

This thread has potential.

Fewer

>a draw gets you nothing

Poteto famine in charge of reading

h-how do I know the original price?

You pasta munching queer fight me. I'll knock the Latin out of you along with your sandnigger teeth.

Easy there starving child or you're going to faint

You always fight people when you're wrong?

I always box the snot off of gay spaghetti fags. Take your healthy food and tan and go talk about your feelings, you fucking queer.

Because of you the first Italian/Spaniard I see in town this weekend is getting a fist across the jaw.

I spit on you bitches. You're like women.

every goal should count as 2 goals

>cost equals x
>what is the cost?

what a dumb question

Of course

Here's another retard, i bet you're from North Potato famine

how about goals from outside the penalty area count double

would lead to more BLOOTERS

Pussy.

And loads of ads. I mean, LOADS!

1,5$
next question

ill bash ye fookin ead in I sware on me mum

Is this a more appropriate response for your starved brain?

samefag

69 billion ugandan dollars

Wrong. It's about três e meio

i dont speak brazilian

>poo peeland

What about german?

von mir aus

>Let's make an artificial winner based on a skills competition or a stripped down version of the actual game so somebody can win

at least in American football most of the ads are avoidable

you can't even watch a soccer match without being bombarded with surreptitious advertising

of course American football probably isn't too far from sponsors on jerseys and excessive telecast overlays so in the end we'll have the worst of both worlds.

Yes you moronic fucks, it's fewer points but it literally does nothing to change the placing of the teams, it's the exact same thing if teams had a win was 25 points, a draw was 23, and a loss was 21. Point differential doesn't change.

*22 for a loss

Is that hibari?

>Australian mathematicians

>Greek economists

Hey! Yannis worked for valve!

>bombarded
>shirt logos that you can't even see and boards around the pitch

Your sports are literally interrupted by advertising.

2$ if you solve y = 1 + y/2

now work out pic related. hint: think about the gaps between primes. the proof is trivial and should take you 3 minutes.

Y=2

> y = 1 + y/2
>mathfags reading comprehension

Du weisst nichts, Hans Schnee

Mom's spaghetti.

What the sandwhich costs /= its orignal price. You can't use the same variable for both. The equation would be y = 1 + (x/2)

it's the only unique solution, tho. taking it literally and giving 1.50 is a dubious answer because then you would have infinite solutions of the form x = y + y/2

Faggot what about aggregate? You haven't factored that into your equation, Einstein.

bc blk ppl lol

my answer came seconds too late but here again: you are right indeed, but with your method you have infinite solutions

>you would have infinite solutions
wrong
if you see something with 50% off, how often do you apply it? once. same shit here.

true i got confused, but i stand by my answer. the unknown quantity obviously is the "original price". taking the $1 as the original price doesn't make sense.

Yes there are infinite solutions because there are infinite possible starting prices. That is why the correct answer is an equation showing the relationship between the initial price and the final cost.

>it says the price of the game is 1€
>but that doesnt make sense

>calling draws stupid
>calling the vietnam and korean wars "undecided"

let's rewrite and say the sandwhich costs minus one dollar equal half of the original costs. how on earth do you get from that wording a price of one dollar?

shouldn't the limit be 1?
I'm too dumb to prove the first one

>let's rewrite
>say the sandwhich costs minus one dollar equal half of the original costs
two different things

They're quite ok, but girlfriend's and Grandma's are definitely better

the limit is indeed zero since you can write that equation as

lim n to inf [1/n (p_n+1 - p_n)] = 0

the first inequality has no proof yet, but you can show it to be true by just plugging in two primes. it's called andricas conjecture if you want to read more.

>the limit is indeed zero since you can write that equation as
>lim n to inf [1/n (p_n+1 - p_n)] = 0
doesn't that imply that (p_n+1 - p_n) < n as n tends to inf? I thought it would always equal n
then again, I can't prove this last statement

...

>falling for obvious bait
I thought germany was white

Non-whites countries do not get a say on who is white

>inb4 Y R U THEN HUEHUEHEUHUEHURHUEHUE

3.50

Would unironically watch this tbf

t. Don't watch divegrass irl but I play fifa

They should change the penalty rules, so that if a striker misses their first shot they can't tap it in after.
Goalkeepers should be rewarded for saving penalties.

u gay lmao
win should be 30 points bcuz it's an oddd number
and tie should be 10 because half of a win
and loss is nothing

I'd watch if they scored more often desu

>10 is the half of 30
>ameriturd """"""""""""""""""education""""""""""""""""""

wtf you guys have the same flag??