DC can't make a proper movie out of Batman, Joker, Harley Quinn and a million villains

>DC can't make a proper movie out of Batman, Joker, Harley Quinn and a million villains
>Marvel can take their most weird-ass hero and get critics raving

what the fuck happened?

>inb4 paid reviews, asspain about quips or something something kino

Adele?

Critics rave about this movie because it is a NuMovie for NuMales and Numales self-identify with quirky know-it-all types. Critics are the epitome of Numales.

Not going to lie, Ancient One was great and for meme-y scene, the whole "Bargain" scene is literal Strangekino to the point of perfection.

Beyoncé?

this movie is assss
holy shit,

Was i supposed to be familiar with the comic book before watching?

the MC was just an unlikeable smug piece of shit

Best boss fight in comicbook movies ever - FACT.

user, I've come to bargain

Id prefer they make good movies rather than have critics raving. Critics are extremely easily to pander, specially when 90% of the critics in meta score sites are not even film critics, just internet/popular culture media reviewers that know shit about films and let their political biases into the scores.

>DC can't make a proper movie out of Batman, Joker, Harley Quinn and a million villains
Watchmen. Also, Marvel never leaves their comfort zone, every movie is pretty much the same.

If WB ever decided to make a Batman and Joker (and Harley) movie, they'd crack the billion. The fuck are they waiting for?

God-like casting.

>DC can't make a proper movie out of Batman, Joker

>Batman 1989
>Returns
>Mask of the phantasm
>Begins
>TDK
>The return of the caped crusaders

Literally what? Keep in mind that more than one of those movies features the Joker.

And if we are going by the quality benchmark of Marvel Disney, then Id put BvS and TDKR there too. Non ironically TDKR even with all its terrible flaws was a better movie than Avengers 1.

Batman was fine in BvS, it's Superman who they don't get.

Those movies prove his point though
It is more about "how do you fuck up batman?"
>Non ironically TDKR even with all its terrible flaws was a better movie than Avengers 1.
Sure TDKR but not fucking BvS or suicide squad.
Those two are legitmately fucking terrible.

Were we meant to understand that? All I got was inane rambling of a Sup Forumstard.

if they shit the bed hard enough with BvS why would you think they'd crack a billion with that.

batman and superman, apart from maybe spider-man can you think of more well known and bankable heroes.

it's pretty surprising that marvel have managed to do so well with quite a few literal who tier characters, dr strange, guardians, ant-man. did people who don't read comics know anything about these characters?

While all that is true, DC doesn't make good movies

This.

Disney knows how to make a "good" film. They'll stick to the formula and make all these "good" films, but they'll never be able to make a great film.

No comic book movie will ever be great anyway.
And if you think any of them are you are fucking manchild.

>>implying the DCEU will ever make a great film

The only people supporting the DCEU have been contrarians on Sup Forums who make elaborate graphic posters.

wrong, marvel is slowly crawling from their comic-action start to a drama-action, you can already see that in CW. meanwhile, DC doesn't leaves their comfort zone of "dark coloured movies" and when they try to put a little bit of comedy in a movie end up oding shit like suicide squad

>implying DC had anything to do with 1989's batman, what made that movie good was burton-keaton-nicholson, not DC

Like clockwork

(U)

>buzzwords make me look knowledgeable and cool!

fuck off mate

That is pretty much a given.